Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Use uncached client and partial metadata for secret and configmaps #4023

Merged

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Member

These changes allow the current stable Cluster API release to reduce its
memory footprint by a large margin.

Currently, we have multiple controllers that are either watching (like
ClusterResourceSet) or querying (get/list) corev1.Secret and
corev1.ConfigMap resources.

When these kinds go through the case, all of the objects in the cluster
end up being cached, not just the ones we're interested in.

In production environments, there might be a large number of ConfigMap
or Secret resources that we end up caching and watching for little gain.

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano vincepri@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #3892

/milestone v0.4.0
/assign @CecileRobertMichon @detiber

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 15, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 15, 2020
@vincepri vincepri changed the title Use uncached client and partial metadata for secret and configmaps ✨ Use uncached client and partial metadata for secret and configmaps Dec 15, 2020
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only two small nits from my side

controllers/remote/cluster_cache.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/framework/convenience.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
These changes allow the current stable Cluster API release to reduce its
memory footprint by a large margin.

Currently, we have multiple controllers that are either watching (like
ClusterResourceSet) or querying (get/list) corev1.Secret and
corev1.ConfigMap resources.

When these kinds go through the case, all of the objects in the cluster
end up being cached, not just the ones we're interested in.

In production environments, there might be a large number of ConfigMap
or Secret resources that we end up caching and watching for little gain.

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <vincepri@vmware.com>
@vincepri
Copy link
Member Author

vincepri commented Jan 4, 2021

This should be good to go

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@vincepri: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main 1ac7896 link /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@vincepri
Copy link
Member Author

vincepri commented Jan 4, 2021

@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Jan 4, 2021

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 4, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CecileRobertMichon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use new a live client where we don't need caching
5 participants