Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚠️ Remove global metrics registration in init, add registration func #2240

Conversation

austince
Copy link

This PR removes setting the workqueue global metrics provider in an init method and instead provides a way for consumers of this lib to set it themselves. Otherwise, there is no way to allow consumers to use a different metrics provider.

Also proposed allowing per-queue metrics providers, which would in effect also solve this problem, but the jury's out on it: kubernetes/kubernetes#114242

Closes #2238

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Mar 14, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: austince
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vincepri for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 14, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @austince!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 14, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @austince. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 14, 2023
@austince austince force-pushed the feat-remove-global-metrics-provider branch from 8d3d971 to 1741df4 Compare March 14, 2023 20:46
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Mar 14, 2023
Signed-off-by: austin ce <austin.cawley@gmail.com>
@austince austince force-pushed the feat-remove-global-metrics-provider branch from 1741df4 to ca0bf05 Compare March 14, 2023 20:47
@austince austince changed the title :warning: Remove global metrics registration in init, add registration func ⚠️ Remove global metrics registration in init, add registration func Mar 14, 2023
@austince
Copy link
Author

cc @alvaroaleman


workqueue.SetProvider(workqueueMetricsProvider{})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As mentioned in the k/k pr, we wont merge this. This breaks the majority use-case (workqueue metrics just work without doing anything) in order to support a minority use-case (set custom provider).

/hold

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this not what you were suggesting here? kubernetes/kubernetes#114242 (comment)

This is marked as a breaking change, and allows consumers to set it. Unsure what the path forward is if it is neither of the options I've proposed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, my suggestion was to change the upstream workqueue to not use a sync.Once so what is set by controller-runtime can be overridden later if desired.

Copy link
Author

@austince austince Mar 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, I'll send a PR for that -- seems to paper over the fact that this library is mutating global state and the "metrics just work without doing anything" use case could be addressed somewhere else (like kubebuilder, which sets up a main), but if this gets it in 🤷🏼

I'll leave this open in the meantime if others want to weigh in.

Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer Mar 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think changing kubebuilder does not really mitigate the situation. I don't have a good overview over the ecosystem but the controllers that I'm aware of don't regularly regenerate their main file with kubebuilder.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okie, I'll close this then -- I've also got a PR for what Alvaro suggested here, if you guys want to drive that approach: kubernetes/kubernetes#116616

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 14, 2023
@austince austince closed this Mar 15, 2023
@austince austince deleted the feat-remove-global-metrics-provider branch March 15, 2023 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Don't set global workqueue MetricsProvider
4 participants