-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Webhook server uses its configured host if set #322
🐛 Webhook server uses its configured host if set #322
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
I just signed the CLA |
And no other addresses. This avoids firewall nagging on macOS. We were already configuring the webhook server to listen on the loopback interface only, but this isn't working due to a bug in controller-runtime. Fixed by kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#322.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
comments inline (never use strings.Join
or fmt.Sprintf
to format addresses)
pkg/webhook/server.go
Outdated
serveFn := func() { | ||
s.httpServer = &http.Server{ | ||
Addr: fmt.Sprintf(":%v", s.Port), | ||
Addr: fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d", host, s.Port), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This breaks on IPv6. Use net.JoinHostPort
instead.
d4d56c2
to
6f73314
Compare
Cheers, ready for another review now |
(and thanks for the speedy response!) |
needs rebase, otherwise looks good 👍 |
6f73314
to
02ffab4
Compare
Rebased. I've updated the top message to re-state what this PR does, because since I made it, upstream has removed the webhook server_test file, and removed the configurability of the host. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: craigfurman The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Update: Since this PR was originally made, the ability to configure the webhook server host was removed from master. Rather than fixing a bug, this PR now introduces a new minor, non-breaking feature.
I would still like to see this merged if possible, as it's handy for integration testing using the webhook server on developer machines that are (perhaps a little overzealously) configured with a firewall to loudly complain if new server processes begin listening on non-loopback interfaces.
The webhook server can be configured with a host to bind to, defaulting to all IPs (empty string) if not set. This was not actually used.