Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor Provider to require DomainFilter #3711

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

johngmyers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Refactors the Provider interface to require a concrete DomainFilter instead of just any DomainFilterInterface. The purpose of this is to allow the upcoming Webhook provider to implement GetDomainFilter by having the negotiation phase return information needed to construct a copy of the target Provider's DomainFilter.

Checklist

  • Unit tests updated
  • End user documentation updated

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 20, 2023
@Raffo
Copy link
Contributor

Raffo commented Jun 21, 2023

GetDomainFilter by having the negotiation phase return information needed to construct a copy of the target Provider's DomainFilter.

@johngmyers can you add more information on how this is supposed to work ?

@johngmyers
Copy link
Contributor Author

We'd have to implement a method of serializing DomainFilter. That could be by having it implement Marshaler and Unmarshaler or by making fields public and putting json tags on them.

The serialized form would consist of the Filters and excludes arrays, plus regex.String() and regexExclusion.String().

The negotiation call (or other call made upon startup) would pass this serialized form from webhook to external-dns. The webhook Provider would deserialize this to a DomainFilter which it would then return from GetDomainFilter.

@Raffo
Copy link
Contributor

Raffo commented Jul 20, 2023

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 20, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johngmyers, mloiseleur, Raffo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 20, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 16b28d8 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jul 20, 2023
11 checks passed
@johngmyers johngmyers deleted the domainfilter branch July 20, 2023 15:08
@johngmyers johngmyers mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2023
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants