Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove generate target from build, run and test targets #228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

a-hilaly
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses #222

This patch removes generate target from build, run and test targets.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @a-hilaly. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 16, 2023
@a-hilaly
Copy link
Contributor Author

I found that there is already a generate target. I'm not super sure if this is what we need here. Do we want to add a script to only call make generate if the APIs changed?

/assign @kannon92 @danielvegamyhre

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

I found that there is already a generate target. I'm not super sure if this is what we need here. Do we want to add a script to only call make generate if the APIs changed?

/assign @kannon92 @danielvegamyhre

Kinda. We want to verify that API changed and generate needs to be called. I think we have something in verify that does this for our manifests.

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

jobset/Makefile

Line 121 in a5f3ee3

verify: vet fmt-verify manifests generate
Is an example

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 16, 2023
@danielvegamyhre
Copy link
Contributor

@a-hilaly Thanks for doing this. Can you confirm that if you make a change to the API Go code without running make generate afterwards, that the command make verify fails? If so, I think we should be good to merge this.

@a-hilaly
Copy link
Contributor Author

@a-hilaly Thanks for doing this. Can you confirm that if you make a change to the API Go code without running make generate afterwards, that the command make verify fails? If so, I think we should be good to merge this.

I can confirm make verify fails if we don't run make generate after an api change

@a-hilaly
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kinda. We want to verify that API changed and generate needs to be called. I think we have something in verify that does this for our manifests.

I can add a new rule auto-generate that will ony execute the generation rules if verify fails.. what do you think about this?

Or maybe we can just call verify early in run, build and test targets?

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

Kinda. We want to verify that API changed and generate needs to be called. I think we have something in verify that does this for our manifests.

I can add a new rule auto-generate that will ony execute the generation rules if verify fails.. what do you think about this?

Or maybe we can just call verify early in run, build and test targets?

I don't think we need to do this. I think we are okay with requiring someone to run make generate if their verify step fails in the CI.

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

With make verify failing if one changes the API I think this solves @danielvegamyhre concern.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 20, 2023
@danielvegamyhre
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Thanks for working on this!

I don't think we need to do this. I think we are okay with requiring someone to run make generate if their verify step fails

Agreed we don't need this.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: a-hilaly, danielvegamyhre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 20, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 69ef243 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 20, 2023
@danielvegamyhre danielvegamyhre mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2023
20 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants