Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix version stamping in build script #496

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

ahmetb
Copy link
Member

@ahmetb ahmetb commented Feb 6, 2020

Fixes #...
Related issue: #...

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 6, 2020
@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Feb 6, 2020

ARGH the unit test was taking dependency on broken behavior 🤦‍♂

@corneliusweig do you think I should remove GitTag and GitCommit from the test case doing the diff test? I think we can't find out those values during testing.

@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Feb 6, 2020

cc: @tony-yang it seems like we're doing cmp.Diff here which is map equality, though it would probably be better to just make sure if the specified set of keys/values exist in the output (instead of exact match)

@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Feb 6, 2020

/hold
until #497; then rebase.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 6, 2020
Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <ahmetb@google.com>
@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Feb 6, 2020

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 6, 2020
@corneliusweig
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for finding this bug.
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahmetb, corneliusweig

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [ahmetb,corneliusweig]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 0c83dce into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 6, 2020
@tony-yang
Copy link
Contributor

cc: @tony-yang it seems like we're doing cmp.Diff here which is map equality, though it would probably be better to just make sure if the specified set of keys/values exist in the output (instead of exact match)

Fair point. Thanks Ahmet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants