Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make TestKrewVersion a substring check #497

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

ahmetb
Copy link
Member

@ahmetb ahmetb commented Feb 6, 2020

Instead of full map comparison, relax it to be "map has all these keys with
the values that contain these strings".

This way, we can test krew version stamping (as it's not deterministic at
testing-time) as well as add more 'krew version' values without needing to
strictly match test.

Related issue: #496

Instead of full map comparison, relax it to be "map has all these keys with
the values that contain these strings".

This way, we can test krew version stamping (as it's not deterministic at
testing-time) as well as add more 'krew version' values without needing to
strictly match test.

Signed-off-by: Ahmet Alp Balkan <ahmetb@google.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 6, 2020
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #497 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #497   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage      57%    57%           
=====================================
  Files          21     21           
  Lines         956    956           
=====================================
  Hits          545    545           
  Misses        357    357           
  Partials       54     54

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 867ad1e...075e72d. Read the comment docs.

@corneliusweig
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I think the substring checking is good enough here. Thanks!
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahmetb, corneliusweig

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [ahmetb,corneliusweig]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1f4b8b3 into kubernetes-sigs:master Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants