Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 update release-3 for v3.0.0 #2163

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 28, 2021
Merged

🌱 update release-3 for v3.0.0 #2163

merged 10 commits into from
Apr 28, 2021

Conversation

estroz
Copy link
Contributor

@estroz estroz commented Apr 28, 2021

This PR merges the local branch master into release-3 in preparation for v3.0.0.

/kind release

atoato88 and others added 10 commits April 26, 2021 13:44
This commit fix markdown format error in VERSIONING.md about ref to
tools-branch link.
Validation appears to have increased slightly, and some deprecated
fields were switch up.  This made it impossible to file issues in
KubeBuilder, which is... suboptimal.

This fixes that, so we can once again open the receive bugs :-)
Previous documentation erroneously misconfigured the cronjob's tutorial
to use the manager's client everywhere, which is poor practice because
using a cache client in assertions leads to flaky & slow tests.

A new PR overcorrected, and switched both assertions *and* the
reconciler to use a live client, which is also wrong, because the
reconciler needs to use a manager's client to function properly.

This corrects the documentation to indicate that reconcilers should use
managers' clients, and test assertions should use a live client, and
adds a full explanation as to why.
This makes sure that the cronjob's tutorial's tests are run in make
test, which should avoid breaking the book again.
The CI previously duplicated the contents of `make test` in a separate
script.  This just makes that script call `make test` instead.
📖 Fix advice on clients in tests, ensure that book gets tested
📖 Fix markdown format in VERSIONING.md
📖 update the docs over regards book-v3 branch
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@estroz: The label(s) kind/release cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

This PR merges the local branch master into release-3 in preparation for v3.0.0.

/kind release

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 28, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 28, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@Adirio Adirio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 28, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Adirio, estroz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 533874b into release-3 Apr 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants