Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unneeded workaround for removing kubeadm DNS #10695

Merged

Conversation

VannTen
Copy link
Contributor

@VannTen VannTen commented Dec 6, 2023

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Kubeadm dns phase is already correctly skipped.
This was a workaround for kubernetes/kubeadm#1557, which was actually
not a bug ; the correct fix was #4867

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Remove unneeded workaround for removing kubeadm DNS

Kubeadm dns phase is correctly skipped.
This was a workaround for kubernetes/kubeadm#1557, which was actually
not a bug ; the correct fix was kubernetes-sigs#4867
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @VannTen. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 6, 2023
@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented Dec 7, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@floryut floryut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@VannTen Thank you 👍

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 7, 2023
@VannTen
Copy link
Contributor Author

VannTen commented Dec 7, 2023

@yankay care for reviewing as well ?

Copy link
Member

@MrFreezeex MrFreezeex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 7, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, MrFreezeex, VannTen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 85f1590 into kubernetes-sigs:master Dec 7, 2023
64 checks passed
@yankay yankay mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2023
pedro-peter pushed a commit to pedro-peter/kubespray that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…10695)

Kubeadm dns phase is correctly skipped.
This was a workaround for kubernetes/kubeadm#1557, which was actually
not a bug ; the correct fix was kubernetes-sigs#4867
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants