Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v1.27][Hetzner] Fix Autoscaling for worker nodes with invalid ProviderID #6722

Conversation

apricote
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug
/area provider/hetzner

What this PR does / why we need it:

This change fixes a bug that arises when the user's cluster includes worker nodes not from Hetzner Cloud, such as a Hetzner Dedicated server or any server resource other than Hetzner. It also corrects the behavior when a server has been physically deleted from Hetzner Cloud.

Backport of #6717 to v1.27 branch.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #6716

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fixed an issue where the Hetzner provider breaks when nodes from other providers are present

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


…erID

This change fixes a bug that arises when the user's cluster includes
worker nodes not from Hetzner Cloud, such as a Hetzner Dedicated server
or any server resource other than Hetzner. It also corrects the
behavior when a server has been physically deleted from Hetzner Cloud.

Signed-off-by: Maksim Paskal <paskal.maksim@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. area/provider/hetzner Issues or PRs related to Hetzner provider labels Apr 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: apricote

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 17, 2024
@Shubham82
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit aa32387 into kubernetes:cluster-autoscaler-release-1.27 Apr 18, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/hetzner Issues or PRs related to Hetzner provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants