Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add kompose.image-pull-secret and kompose.image-pull-policy #1040

Closed

Conversation

mikesimos
Copy link

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 13, 2018
@cdrage
Copy link
Member

cdrage commented Jul 24, 2018

Tests are written, we've gotten multiple different PR's for this (#1039).

I think we should merge this in. At least until native secrets implementation is added.

What do you think @hangyan ?

@mikesimos
Copy link
Author

@cdrage my bad. Looks like I 've included #1031 commits here as well.
Should I remove them from this PR, for distinct reviews, or just close #1031? Thanks!

@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ _testmain.go
# Output of the go coverage tool, specifically when used with LiteIDE
*.out

# COveralls files
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coveralls

@cdrage
Copy link
Member

cdrage commented Jul 24, 2018

Including them here is fine @mikesimos ! I think that we should merge in these labels as they've been requested quite a bit. At least until Secrets is natively implemented, the labels is a good middle-ground. As well as coverage for version 1/2 of Docker Compose.

Just waiting for reviews from @hangyan and maybe @xianlubird

@mikesimos mikesimos changed the title Add kompose.image-pull-policy Add kompose.image-pull-secret and kompose.image-pull-policy Jul 24, 2018
@xianlubird
Copy link
Contributor

@mikesimos

  1. Maybe you should rebase these commits to one or two commits
  2. How about compose v1 and v2
  3. Until now, the PR is fine.

@mbana
Copy link

mbana commented Jul 25, 2018

Awesome. Just what I was looking for.

Any ETA on when this might get merged into master?

@hangyan
Copy link
Contributor

hangyan commented Jul 26, 2018

@mbana Secret can be added to the default ServiceAccount in the same namespace, check this out:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-service-account/#add-imagepullsecrets-to-a-service-account After this ,you do not need to specify the secret name in the deployment or pod, kubernetes will figure it out itself

@mbana
Copy link

mbana commented Aug 1, 2018

I should have been more clear. I am waiting for the kompose.image-pull-policy feature.

@hangyan
Copy link
Contributor

hangyan commented Aug 1, 2018

@mikesimos Beside cdrage's comment, others LGTM

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 30, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 29, 2018
@kiela
Copy link
Contributor

kiela commented Dec 14, 2018

@cdrage @hangyan Any chance to merge it and release as both of you said this feature can be shipped?

@cdrage
Copy link
Member

cdrage commented Dec 14, 2018

When @mikesimos updates his PR / resolves conflicts I can take a look at the code and do a review. I don't see an issue anymore adding this 👍

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants