-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(Mathlib/Algebra/BrauerGroup/Defs): define Brauer Equivalence and Brauer Group #20968
Conversation
PR summary ba507b2bfbImport changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <junyanxu.math@gmail.com>
# TODOs | ||
1. Prove that the Brauer group is an abelian group. | ||
2. Prove that the Brauer group is a functor from the category of fields to the category of groups. | ||
3. Prove that over a field, being Brauer equivalent is the same as being Morita equivalent. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this we do need to use the notion of Morita equivalence over a base field/commutative ring, which is now in #20632: see https://mathoverflow.net/questions/344673/are-azumaya-algebras-of-trivial-brauer-class-isomorphic-to-mathcalend-mathc#comment1183423_344684
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the official PR is actually #20640, I have a WIP branch on mathlib called azumaya_wip
that's gonna be about proving azumaya algebras on fields aare indeed central simple algebras but a lot prerequists are yet to implement,
optimistically speaking that part of content is about 2-3 PRs away?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
equivalency of Azumaya
and CSA
sorry-freed! Next step is to prove Morita
iff BrauerEquivalent
over field!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm inclined to wait with this PR for a little time while mathlib learns more about Azumaya algebras. Because I imagine that most of this file will have to be rewritten anyways once you have Morita equivalence for Azumaya algebras available.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No I think my current plan is (because I have lots of materials on CSA
and BrauerGroup
awaiting PR) to PR only about fields and I'm proving over fields this is equivalent to azumaya algebra and morita equivalence if that's okay
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, let's go for it.
bors merge
Co-authored-by: Junyan Xu <junyanxu.math@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bhavik Mehta <bhavikmehta8@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
… Brauer Group (#20968) co-authored by: @jjaassoonn Co-authored-by: Whysoserioushah <109107491+Whysoserioushah@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
co-authored by: @jjaassoonn