New CLI options, custom tags range and tests. #31

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:22:44Z

Summary

This PR mainly introduces a way of querying commits for a custom tags range (at the moment only commits after the last available tag are taken into consideration) and to group them by tag.

Description

There are quite some changes in the diff (Changelog.js), most of them are just about formatting and code improvements though. I'll point out in the diff the places to look at, regarding the actual changes.
Those changes also should not break anything, as far as I can tell the old behaviour is still preserved.

CLI options
To be able to query the commits for a custom range of tags, there are 2 options that we can use:

--tag-from <tag> # default is the latest available tag
--tag-to <tag>

# --tag-to should be a tag after --tag-from

Slightly different approach by using "positional arguments"

It's kind of a workaround because `yargs` supports that only for _commands_ and because if we want them to be `..` it's considered as 1 argument (because of the `..`) and we need to do some parsing anyway.

$ lerna-changelog <fromTag>..<toTag>

diff --git cli.js cli.js
index 841e66a..ae2d5c0 100755
--- cli.js
+++ cli.js
@@ -1,39 +1,57 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
-
 var chalk = require("chalk");
 var Changelog = require(".").Changelog;
 var ConfigurationError = require(".").ConfigurationError;

 var argv = require("yargs")
-  .usage("Usage: lerna-changelog [options]")
-  .options({
-    "tag-from": {
-      type: "string",
-      desc: "A git tag that determines the lower bound of the range of commits (defaults to last available)"
-    },
-    "tag-to": {
-      type: "string",
-      desc: "A git tag that determines the upper bound of the range of commits"
-    }
-  })
+  .usage("Usage: lerna-changelog <fromTag>..<toTag>")
   .example(
     "lerna-changelog",
     "create a changelog for the changes after the latest available tag"
   )
   .example(
-    "lerna-changelog --tag-from 0.1.0 --tag-to 0.3.0",
+    "lerna-changelog 0.1.0",
+    "create a changelog for the changes after the given tag"
+  )
+  .example(
+    "lerna-changelog 0.1.0..0.3.0",
     "create a changelog for the changes in all tags within the given range"
   )
   .version()
   .help()
   .argv;

+var fromTag;
+var toTag;
+var args = argv._;
+if (args.length > 1) {
+  console.error(
+    chalk.red("Invalid arguments, must be in format `<fromTag>..<toTag>`")
+  );
+  process.exit(1);
+} else if (args.length === 1) {
+  var indexOfSeparator = args[0].indexOf("..");
+  if (indexOfSeparator === 0) {
+    console.error(
+      chalk.red("The lower bound tag is required `<fromTag>..<toTag>`")
+    );
+    process.exit(1);
+  } else if (indexOfSeparator === -1) {
+    fromTag = args[0];
+  } else {
+    var parts = args[0].split("..");
+    fromTag = parts[0];
+    toTag = parts[1];
+  }
+}
+
+var options = { fromTag: fromTag, toTag: toTag };
 try {
-  console.log((new Changelog(argv)).createMarkdown());
+  console.log(new Changelog(options).createMarkdown());
 } catch (e) {
   if (e instanceof ConfigurationError) {
     console.log(chalk.red(e.message));
   } else {
-    throw (e);
+    throw e;
   }
 }

Lerna.json options
A new option ignoreCommitters can be used in lerna.json to ignore matching committers. This is particularly useful for commiters such as greenkeeper or any kind of bot accounts.
Changelog entries grouped by tag
As briefly discussed in Be able to specify a commit range (default to last tag like before) #25, having a list of commits possibly spread across multiple tags should result in multiple changelog entries for each tag.

Empty tags (with no commits) will be discarded

## Unreleased (2017-01-15)

#### :rocket: New Feature
* `pkg-1`, `pkg-2`
  * This is the commit title for the issue (#4). ([@test-user](https://github.com/test-user))
  * This is the commit title for the issue (#3). ([@test-user](https://github.com/test-user))

#### Committers: 1
- Test User ([test-user](https://github.com/test-user))


## v0.2.0 (2017-01-01)

#### :rocket: New Feature
* `pkg-1`,
  * This is the commit title for the issue (#2). ([@test-user](https://github.com/test-user))
  * This is the commit title for the issue (#1). ([@test-user](https://github.com/test-user))

#### Committers: 1
- Test User ([test-user](https://github.com/test-user))

Tests
Some basic tests have been added, including mocked modules.

TODO

setup travis build
document how changelog is generated (closes Explain how changelog is generated on Readme #30)
make npm aware of executables (move cli.js into bin folder)
--summary option to print information about processed commits (if commits got discarded, etc)

This PR mainly introduces a way of querying commits for a custom tags range (at the moment only commits after the last available tag are taken into consideration). Now you can specify a custom range by passing --tagFrom and/or --tagTo options (--tagTo should be a tag after --tagFrom). Additionally, as also mentioned in lerna#25, if multiple tags are present within the custom commits range, they will be grouped together a changelog entry for each tag will be created. Basic tests are also present now. Closes lerna#17,lerna#19,lerna#25

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:23:47Z

package.json

@@ -7,9 +7,10 @@
    "lerna-changelog": "cli.js"
  },
  "scripts": {
-    "build": "babel src -d lib",
+    "build": "npm run clean && babel src --out-dir lib --ignore src/__mocks__/GithubAPI.js,src/__mocks__/Changelog.js",


I'm not sure if there is a better way of doing this...

We can just ignore in npmignore/files? (I normally but all tests in a test folder not like jest so not sure)

The problem is if I keep those mocked folders is that they will be present in /lib as well as /src and when jest runs it outputs some logs. Unfortunately I couldn't find a way of configuring this with jest, if you know of a better solution I'm all ears.

jest-haste-map: duplicate manual mock found: Module name: GithubAPI Duplicate Mock path: /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/src/__mocks__/GithubAPI.js This warning is caused by two manual mock files with the same file name. Jest will use the mock file found in: /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/src/__mocks__/GithubAPI.js Please delete one of the following two files: /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/lib/__mocks__/GithubAPI.js /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/src/__mocks__/GithubAPI.js jest-haste-map: duplicate manual mock found: Module name: Changelog Duplicate Mock path: /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/src/__mocks__/Changelog.js This warning is caused by two manual mock files with the same file name. Jest will use the mock file found in: /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/src/__mocks__/Changelog.js Please delete one of the following two files: /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/lib/__mocks__/Changelog.js /Users/emmenko/dev/src/lerna-changelog/src/__mocks__/Changelog.js

now I wonder how our jest + babel projects are doing it then? @cpojer if have ideas

We don't publish Jest's mocks to npm. They are internal to Jest, I suggest you do the same.

I also found this thread from you @cpojer where you mention

Manual mocking is really messed up and doesn't work well.

Do you still recommend to use them or to "wait until they're fixed"?

Besides the publishing part, what about compiled sources from babel? Should we manually ignore those or is there a better way of doing it?
Thanks for the help!

I recommend using them within one project but I do not recommend publishing them to npm.

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:24:29Z

src/Changelog.js

 import ConfigurationError from "./ConfigurationError";

+const UNRELEASED_TAG = "___unreleased___";


This is used for grouping unreleased commits

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:24:45Z

src/Changelog.js

+
+    // CLI options
+    this.tagFrom = options.tagFrom;
+    this.tagTo = options.tagTo;


Those are the new CLI options

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:25:11Z

src/Changelog.js

-
+    // Get all info about commits in a certain tags range
+    const commitsInfo = this.getCommitsInfo();
+    const commitsByTag = this.getCommitsByTag(commitsInfo);


This is the new function to group commits by tag

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:25:41Z

src/Changelog.js

+                "))";
+            });
+          });
+        });


Nothing changed much here, just formatting

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:26:27Z

src/Changelog.js

+        }
+        return acc;
+      }, {})
+    );


Same as before, just extracted into a separate function

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:28:16Z

src/Changelog.js

+    const commits = execSync(
+      // Prints "<short-hash>;<ref-name>;<summary>;<date>"
+      // This format is used in `getCommitsInfo` for easily analize the commit.
+      'git log --oneline --pretty="%h;%D;%s;%cd" --date=short ' + tagsRange


This is the most important part. Besides passing a custom range, the output is formatted with a specific pattern. This is necessary in order to analyse the commit.

<short-hash>;<ref-name>;<summary>;<date>

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:28:48Z

src/Changelog.js

+          c => c === login || login.indexOf(c) > -1
+        )
+      );
+      if (login && shouldKeepCommiter && !committers[login]) {


This part includes the other option ignoreCommitters.

emmenko · 2017-01-15T23:29:28Z

src/Changelog.js

+        tag = _refs[1].replace(/tag:\s(.*?)$/, "$1").trim();
+      }
+      const message = parts[2];
+      const date = parts[3];


This part has been refactored to parse the different commit info, especially the tag name

hzoo · 2017-01-16T14:49:20Z

.eslintrc

@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
    "indent": ["error", 2]
  },
  "env": {
+    "es6": true,
+    "jest": true,


for the eslint config we should just use https://github.com/babel/eslint-config-babel. I would do this in a new pr after this is merged so its easier to review

hzoo · 2017-01-16T14:50:14Z

awesome stuff, there's a lot here so may take a while to review

hzoo · 2017-01-16T15:29:39Z

cc @fson if curious/helpful?

emmenko · 2017-01-16T17:25:17Z

awesome stuff, there's a lot here so may take a while to review

Yeah take your time, I also left some TODOs in the PR description for extra stuff that can be addressed as well. I'm open to suggestions and improvements anyway on the take of this PR, so feel free to give all the feedback you have before we can proceed further ;)
And I'm happy to discuss / clarify anything you would like to.
Thanks

…ests

hzoo · 2017-01-17T17:06:22Z

README.md

@@ -71,6 +71,20 @@ You'll need a GitHub API [personal access token](https://github.com/settings/tok
 - `repo`: Your "org/repo" on GitHub
 - `cacheDir` [optional]: A place to stash GitHub API responses to avoid throttling
 - `labels`: GitHub issue/PR labels mapped to changelog section headers
+- `ignoreCommitters` [optional]: list of commiters to ignore (exact or partial match)


Ah yeah I guess this could be useful for bots like greenkeeper?

Yep, exactly ;) We could also mention it in the CLI help

hzoo · 2017-01-17T17:06:49Z

README.md

+
+
+  Options:
+    --tagFrom <tag>  define a custom tag to determine the lower bound of the range of commits (default: last available git tag)


Not a big deal but is --tag-from or --tagFrom more common for cli?

In my experience, --kebab-case (dashed) is more common for long flags. Most arg parsers will map them to the camelCase version automatically.

Good point, I'll change that 👍

hzoo · 2017-01-17T17:08:26Z

cli.js

@@ -1,13 +1,26 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node

 var chalk = require("chalk");
-var lib = require(".");
+var argv = require("yargs").argv;


We don't have to but looks like we use meow in lerna already https://github.com/lerna/lerna/blob/master/bin/lerna.js#L6

I actually wanted to refactor lerna's (well, at the time, asini's) usage of meow into yargs, it's got so many neat bells and whistles (with better help out of the box).

hzoo · 2017-01-17T17:08:49Z

package.json

    "clean": "rimraf lib",
-    "test": "eslint index.js cli.js src/",
+    "lint": "eslint index.js cli.js src/",


I don't think you need the / for src

hzoo · 2017-01-17T17:14:55Z

src/Changelog.js

        response.commitSHA = sha;
        response.mergeMessage = message;
-        return response;
+        Object.assign(commitInfo, response);


This reminds me that if we have have tests we should setup travis with node 0.10 since we haven't dropped it yet. Then we can drop < node 4 in a major.

The travis build is one of the TODOs yes. Which versions do you want to test? I guess:

0.10

0.12

4

6

Yeah that sounds good.

I figured we can do a release with this and then after do a major bump to remove it

Btw, do you want to automate the release process (e.g. semantic-release) or still keep it manual (npm publish)? At least I would consider having a script to bump the version, tag it and publish it.
But I'm not sure how you guys are used to work and prefer to do this sorts of stuff, so yeah just asking... :)

I haven't used semantic release and most projects like Babel I would want to do a batch of commits rather than a new release per PR. But I guess for something smaller we could like this. I don't know?

No worries, I don't have much of a preference either. I would probably keep it consistent with what lerna is using.
Anyway, not really in the scope of this PR :)

hzoo · 2017-01-17T17:23:12Z

test/__snapshots__/Changelog.spec.js.snap

+#### :rocket: New Feature
+* \`pkg-1\`, \`pkg-2\`
+  * [#1](https://github.com/lerna/lerna-changelog/pull/1) This is the commit title for the issue (#1). ([@test-user](https://github.com/test-user))
+  * [#1](https://github.com/lerna/lerna-changelog/pull/1) This is the commit title for the issue (#1). ([@test-user](https://github.com/test-user))


why does this have 2 of the same commit?

Yeah, actually it's correct to have 2 commit entries here. The problem is that the mock returns the same value, thus you see the same message. But I want to refactor a bit more the way we're mocking stuff, making it easier to setup the tests.
I'll push some changes soon.

Cool! Would be awesome to have a test for 2 tags (New feature/bugfix or something) and see the formatting

basically just the places where the formatting might be different

hzoo · 2017-01-17T17:23:52Z

test/__snapshots__/Changelog.spec.js.snap

+
+#### Committers: 0
+"
+`;


If the tag is empty should it not print (same if no committers?)

Good point, I'll look into it 👍

Done f321146

evocateur · 2017-01-17T17:38:02Z

cli.js


-var Changelog = lib.Changelog;
-var ConfigurationError = lib.ConfigurationError;
+if (argv.help) {


If you are going to use yargs, seems like you could do some minimal configuration and get this --help output for free (as well as help subcommand).

var argv = require("yargs") .usage("$0 [options]") .options({ "tag-from": { type: "string", desc: "A git tag that determines the lower bound of the range of commits (defaults to last available)" }, "tag-to": { type: "string", desc: "A git tag that determines the upper bound of the range of commits" } }) .help() .argv;

Given the powers of yargs, you might even consider the tagFrom and tagTo to be positional arguments rather than flags, given that it really only makes sense to specify them in the order one might expect when specifying the range in git (${fromTag}..${toTag}).

Ah that's perfect! For some reasons I didn't go through the entire readme they have. I'll change that, thanks!

It is a ridiculously long README, that is true. :)

Done ecb8520

The positional arguments as far as I can see can only be used for a command which in our case is not necessary.

@evocateur so I tried the "positional arguments approach". It's kind of a workaround because yargs supports that only for commands and because if we want them to be <fromTag>..<toTag> it's considered as 1 argument (because of the ..) and we need to do some parsing anyway.

Those will be the changes. I'll keep them stashed locally until we decide whether to go with that or not.

diff --git cli.js cli.js index 841e66a..ae2d5c0 100755 --- cli.js +++ cli.js @@ -1,39 +1,57 @@ #!/usr/bin/env node - var chalk = require("chalk"); var Changelog = require(".").Changelog; var ConfigurationError = require(".").ConfigurationError; var argv = require("yargs") - .usage("Usage: lerna-changelog [options]") - .options({ - "tag-from": { - type: "string", - desc: "A git tag that determines the lower bound of the range of commits (defaults to last available)" - }, - "tag-to": { - type: "string", - desc: "A git tag that determines the upper bound of the range of commits" - } - }) + .usage("Usage: lerna-changelog <fromTag>..<toTag>") .example( "lerna-changelog", "create a changelog for the changes after the latest available tag" ) .example( - "lerna-changelog --tag-from 0.1.0 --tag-to 0.3.0", + "lerna-changelog 0.1.0", + "create a changelog for the changes after the given tag" + ) + .example( + "lerna-changelog 0.1.0..0.3.0", "create a changelog for the changes in all tags within the given range" ) .version() .help() .argv; +var fromTag; +var toTag; +var args = argv._; +if (args.length > 1) { + console.error( + chalk.red("Invalid arguments, must be in format `<fromTag>..<toTag>`") + ); + process.exit(1); +} else if (args.length === 1) { + var indexOfSeparator = args[0].indexOf(".."); + if (indexOfSeparator === 0) { + console.error( + chalk.red("The lower bound tag is required `<fromTag>..<toTag>`") + ); + process.exit(1); + } else if (indexOfSeparator === -1) { + fromTag = args[0]; + } else { + var parts = args[0].split(".."); + fromTag = parts[0]; + toTag = parts[1]; + } +} + +var options = { fromTag: fromTag, toTag: toTag }; try { - console.log((new Changelog(argv)).createMarkdown()); + console.log(new Changelog(options).createMarkdown()); } catch (e) { if (e instanceof ConfigurationError) { console.log(chalk.red(e.message)); } else { - throw (e); + throw e; } }

hzoo · 2017-01-17T22:58:04Z

This is awesome btw - although it's kind of feels like a rewrite all the code I had was pretty messy. It's difficult to really review but since there's tests that's all that matters in a sense 😄 . After all just a changelog generator

hzoo · 2017-01-20T15:06:43Z

Very cool 👍

emmenko · 2017-01-24T14:57:21Z

@hzoo @gigabo @evocateur sorry guys, I know we are all busy with more important stuff, just wondering if you got a chance to have another look at this. Thanks ;)

hzoo · 2017-01-24T15:44:21Z

I think it's good we can continue to make new prs to make it better. Difficult to review otherwise.

hzoo · 2017-01-24T15:45:01Z

test/functional/__snapshots__/markdown-full.spec.js.snap

+#### Committers: 1
+- Han Solo ([han-solo](https://github.com/han-solo))
+
+


Non-blocking: wondering why there's 2 new lines here (unless we want that)

I thought it's a bit better to distinguish between tags / releases. If you think it's not important I can put only 1 break like back.

hzoo · 2017-01-24T15:45:31Z

test/functional/__snapshots__/markdown-full.spec.js.snap

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+exports[`createMarkdown outputs correct changelog 1`] = `
+"


Is the " here intentional + the escaped quotes below or is that just part of the snapshot?

Yeah, it's part of the snapshot.

describe('hello', () => { it('world', () => { expect('hello\nworld').toMatchSnapshot() }) }) exports[`foo bar 1`] = ` "hello world" `;

evocateur · 2017-01-24T19:46:48Z

package.json

@@ -7,9 +7,10 @@
    "lerna-changelog": "cli.js"
  },
  "scripts": {
-    "build": "babel src -d lib",
+    "build": "npm run clean && babel src --out-dir lib --ignore src/__mocks__/GithubAPI.js,src/__mocks__/Changelog.js,src/__mocks__/ApiDataCache.js,src/__mocks__/execSync.js",


Wouldn't --ignore src/__mocks__ be sufficient here?

True, thanks 😄

hzoo · 2017-01-26T15:35:03Z

test/functional/__snapshots__/markdown-full.spec.js.snap

+## Unreleased (2099-01-01)
+
+#### :rocket: New Feature
+* \`the-force-awakens\`, \`rogue-one\`


I don't think we want it to be outputting \` in the changelog if that's possible?

It's just what the snapshot output looks like, the normal output doesn't have the escapes.

hzoo · 2017-01-26T15:35:34Z

lgtm just wondering about the escaped quotes in the changelog output

hzoo · 2017-01-26T16:54:33Z

From master on Babel

## Unreleased (2017-01-26)

🐛 Bug Fix

babel-generator
- #5193 Fix missing parens when function expressions is tag. (@existentialism)

📝 Documentation

babel-plugin-transform-flow-strip-types
- #5212 Remove REPL link transform-flow-strip-types doc. (@xtuc)
babel-plugin-transform-regenerator
- #5202 Fix transform-regenerator README. (@xtuc)
babel-plugin-transform-es2015-arrow-functions
- #5200 Fix transform-es2015-arrow-functions code blocks on the website. (@xtuc)
- #5194 Fix transform-es2015-arrow-functions README. (@xtuc)

🏠 Internal

Other
- #5182 Run coverage only once. (@existentialism)
- #5165 Add Node 7 to CI. (@chicoxyzzy)

Committers: 4

Brian Ng (existentialism)
Henry Zhu (hzoo)
Sergey Rubanov (chicoxyzzy)
Sven SAULEAU (xtuc)

…mits

emmenko · 2017-01-29T10:19:34Z

One last thing that I forgot guys (see 0408bcb): in case there are multiple tags referenced by the same commit, we should group each one of them separately (each one will have the same list of commits).
In my opinion this is the expected behaviour, it makes it also easier to copy-paste the log for each tag in their respective github release page.

Example:

$ git log --oneline --pretty="%h;%D;%s;%cd" --date=short v0.1.0..
a0000004;tag: a-new-hope@4.0.0, tag: empire-strikes-back@5.0.0, tag: return-of-the-jedi@6.0.0;chore(release): releasing component;1977-05-25
a0000003;;Merge pull request #1 from star-wars;1977-05-25
a0000002;tag: v0.1.0;chore(release): releasing component;1966-01-01
a0000001;;fix: some random fix which will be ignored;1966-01-01

Alternatively such multiple tags are listed in the same group of commits, but I find it kind of wrong.

emmenko · 2017-01-29T13:10:29Z

On the other hand, if I merge different kind of PRs referring to different packages (with different changes), then do a release round, lerna will publish all different packages and their related tags. If we generate the changelog at this point in time, we'll result having this "huge" group of tags containing all sorts of commits, mostly unrelated to each other, which is kind of confusing.

Oh man, I'm getting really confused myself now with how exactly the publishing / tagging should work for the different packages 😵

Any idea how we should approach this?
I guess this is a problem more related to packages using independent versioning and tags named after the packages themselves.

hzoo · 2017-01-29T13:12:36Z

I guess this is a problem more related to packages using independent versioning and tags named after the packages themselves.

Yes! I think for both modes we'd want to bundle up the changelog per release rather than by tag. So need to differentiate between multiple tag releases at once in independent mode vs just trying to print out previous versions (which shouldn't happen that often really)

emmenko · 2017-01-29T17:19:13Z

Can you give some examples how you would expect this to be?

hzoo · 2017-01-29T21:48:27Z

Thinking about cra (https://github.com/facebookincubator/create-react-app/releases) - the way lerna works currently is that it makes a tag for each pkg. I mean maybe you want a separate heading for each release/pkg but I don't know. I'm ok with this for now? We can just make it a major version and do some patches

btw please join our slack if you haven't already! https://slack.lernajs.io/

hzoo · 2017-01-29T22:05:41Z

We can always push out some patches

Feel free to make issues for the things we didn't get to

hzoo · 2017-01-29T22:31:01Z

@emmenko trying to figure out how to run lerna-changelog on itself given this PR 😛

hzoo · 2017-01-29T22:31:38Z

Thanks so much for this awesome work btw! (Wanted to get a release out but it made sense to try out a changelog on this repo since ironically it doesn't have one itself)

emmenko · 2017-01-29T23:54:31Z

Glad I could help somehow! Hope to figure out soon this release/tag thingy. 🤔

hzoo · 2017-03-03T15:13:16Z

@emmenko can you make issues for the things you missed before?

emmenko · 2017-03-14T11:20:08Z

@hzoo most of the stuff has been already done (eslint, travis, etc). Should be fine then, if I think of something else I'll open an issue

emmenko commented Jan 15, 2017

View reviewed changes

src/Changelog.js

"))";

});

});

});

Copy link

Contributor Author

emmenko Jan 15, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing changed much here, just formatting

emmenko commented Jan 15, 2017

View reviewed changes

src/Changelog.js

}

return acc;

}, {})

);

Copy link

Contributor Author

emmenko Jan 15, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as before, just extracted into a separate function

emmenko commented Jan 15, 2017

View reviewed changes

emmenko added 2 commits January 16, 2017 00:52

test(changelog): use jest snapshot for testing generated markdown

9b5c550

fix(mocks): remove unused variable

6531ecb

hzoo reviewed Jan 16, 2017

View reviewed changes

hzoo requested a review from gigabo January 16, 2017 15:29

fix(changelog): keep unreleased date fixed to properly use snapshot t…

eb6c290

…ests

hzoo reviewed Jan 17, 2017

View reviewed changes

evocateur reviewed Jan 17, 2017

View reviewed changes

emmenko added 3 commits January 17, 2017 23:00

refactor(cli): properly use yargs features to properly describe the cli

ecb8520

fix(changelog): discard tag if there are no available commits in it

f321146

docs(readme): adjust cli help output

cb3e835

emmenko mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2017

Generate changelog for published packages commercetools/nodejs#44

Merged

hzoo reviewed Jan 24, 2017

View reviewed changes

chore(package.json): exclude missing mockfiles from being transpiled

b00790d

evocateur reviewed Jan 24, 2017

View reviewed changes

chore(package.json): simplify babel script

d7f698c

hzoo reviewed Jan 26, 2017

View reviewed changes

hzoo approved these changes Jan 26, 2017

View reviewed changes

refactor(changelog): support grouping tags referenced by the same com…

0408bcb

…mits

hzoo merged commit 8b98dd0 into lerna:master Jan 29, 2017

emmenko deleted the historical-logs-multi-tags branch January 29, 2017 22:16

hzoo assigned hzoo and unassigned hzoo Jan 29, 2017

hzoo added the enhancement label Jan 29, 2017

		import ConfigurationError from "./ConfigurationError";

		const UNRELEASED_TAG = "___unreleased___";



		Options:
		--tagFrom <tag> define a custom tag to determine the lower bound of the range of commits (default: last available git tag)

		#### Committers: 1
		- Han Solo ([han-solo](https://github.com/han-solo))

		@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
		exports[`createMarkdown outputs correct changelog 1`] = `
		"

New CLI options, custom tags range and tests. #31

New CLI options, custom tags range and tests. #31

Conversation

emmenko commented Jan 15, 2017 • edited Loading

Summary

Description

TODO

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

emmenko Jan 16, 2017 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

hzoo commented Jan 16, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 16, 2017

emmenko commented Jan 16, 2017 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

hzoo commented Jan 17, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 20, 2017

emmenko commented Jan 24, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 24, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

hzoo Jan 24, 2017 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

hzoo commented Jan 26, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 26, 2017

🐛 Bug Fix

📝 Documentation

🏠 Internal

Committers: 4

emmenko commented Jan 29, 2017

emmenko commented Jan 29, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 29, 2017

emmenko commented Jan 29, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 29, 2017 • edited Loading

hzoo commented Jan 29, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 29, 2017

hzoo commented Jan 29, 2017

emmenko commented Jan 15, 2017 •

edited

Loading

emmenko Jan 16, 2017 •

edited

Loading

emmenko commented Jan 16, 2017 •

edited

Loading

hzoo Jan 24, 2017 •

edited

Loading

hzoo commented Jan 29, 2017 •

edited

Loading