Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rendezvous spec #284

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 13, 2020
Merged

fix: rendezvous spec #284

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 13, 2020

Conversation

vasco-santos
Copy link
Member

This PR adds the SignedPeerRecord to the Register message.

Since this is still a Working Draft spec, there are a few things that I would like to suggest:

  • I think we should drop the PeerInfo message and just use the SignedPeerRecord
  • Should we add a limit in the size of a namespace to register?

@vasco-santos
Copy link
Member Author

Thoughts @vyzo @jacobheun ?

@vyzo
Copy link
Contributor

vyzo commented Jul 20, 2020

Yeah, let's just use signed peer records.

rendezvous/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ message Message {
optional string ns = 1;
optional PeerInfo peer = 2;
optional int64 ttl = 3; // in seconds
optional bytes signedPeerRecord = 4;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, drop PeerInfo for signedPeerRecord. Also, this spec needs to point to the SignedPeerRecord spec to clarify what bytes signedPeerRecord actually is.

Copy link
Member Author

@vasco-santos vasco-santos Jul 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, should we get the latest recommendations in and get the signed peer record PR merged? #217

rendezvous/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jacobheun jacobheun merged commit 2e175f0 into master Nov 13, 2020
@jacobheun jacobheun deleted the fix/rendezvous-spec branch November 13, 2020 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants