Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RegisterCoalescer] Fix reuse of instruction pointers #73519

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vvuksanovic
Copy link

If a pointer gets recycled while it is already in a work list, it can cause duplicates in the work lists. In that case the same instruction may be processed twice. If it is coalesced the first time, processing it again would read deallocated memory. This is fixed by removing the first occurrence from the work lists when we detect a pointer was recycled.

Fixes #71178

If a pointer gets recycled while it is already in a work list, it can
cause duplicates in the work lists. In that case the same instruction
may be processed twice. If it is coalesced the first time, processing
it again would read deallocated memory. This is fixed by removing the
first occurrence from the work lists when we detect a pointer was
recycled.

Fixes llvm#71178
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Nov 27, 2023

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-regalloc

Author: Vladimir Vuksanovic (vvuksanovic)

Changes

If a pointer gets recycled while it is already in a work list, it can cause duplicates in the work lists. In that case the same instruction may be processed twice. If it is coalesced the first time, processing it again would read deallocated memory. This is fixed by removing the first occurrence from the work lists when we detect a pointer was recycled.

Fixes #71178


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73519.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp (+22-1)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp
index 9858482cd51b4a7..a68ebaa9b6828a4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp
@@ -1031,6 +1031,19 @@ RegisterCoalescer::removeCopyByCommutingDef(const CoalescerPair &CP,
   return { true, ShrinkB };
 }
 
+// Replace the given MachineInstr * with nullptr inside a work list. Used to
+// remove an instruction when its pointer is reused. Returns true if replaced,
+// false otherwise.
+static bool removeFromWorkList(MutableArrayRef<MachineInstr *> WorkList,
+                               MachineInstr *MI) {
+  auto It = std::find(WorkList.begin(), WorkList.end(), MI);
+  if (It != WorkList.end()) {
+    *It = nullptr;
+    return true;
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
 /// For copy B = A in BB2, if A is defined by A = B in BB0 which is a
 /// predecessor of BB2, and if B is not redefined on the way from A = B
 /// in BB0 to B = A in BB2, B = A in BB2 is partially redundant if the
@@ -1190,7 +1203,15 @@ bool RegisterCoalescer::removePartialRedundancy(const CoalescerPair &CP,
     // If the newly created Instruction has an address of an instruction that was
     // deleted before (object recycled by the allocator) it needs to be removed from
     // the deleted list.
-    ErasedInstrs.erase(NewCopyMI);
+    bool WasErased = ErasedInstrs.erase(NewCopyMI);
+    // Also remove the deleted instruction from work lists. There shouldn't be
+    // duplicate instructions there.
+    if (WasErased) {
+      // Attempt to remove from WorkList. If not found, it could be in
+      // LocalWorkList.
+      if (!removeFromWorkList(WorkList, NewCopyMI))
+        removeFromWorkList(LocalWorkList, NewCopyMI);
+    }
   } else {
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tremovePartialRedundancy: Remove the copy from "
                       << printMBBReference(MBB) << '\t' << CopyMI);

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw requested review from qcolombet and jayfoad and removed request for dtcxzyw November 27, 2023 18:16
Copy link
Contributor

@arsenm arsenm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs test.

I'm not a fan of try to remove from the worklist after the fact, and then try the second worklist. We know from the copy which list it was in, whether it was local or not.

I've also never trusted this managing pointers to instructions that have already been deleted scheme.

// duplicate instructions there.
if (WasErased) {
// Attempt to remove from WorkList. If not found, it could be in
// LocalWorkList.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the partial redundancy case, can't it only be in the global worklist?

Comment on lines 1203 to 1204
// If the newly created Instruction has an address of an instruction that was
// deleted before (object recycled by the allocator) it needs to be removed from
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really trust this system of relying on deleted instruction pointers. Is there a better way to handle this?

@DianQK
Copy link
Member

DianQK commented Feb 8, 2024

Hi, are you continuing to work at this PR? Even though I haven't seen any other activity from you, I should still ask. :)

I would want you to go ahead and finish if you can. Because I see this is your first PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clang crash: Assertion `isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"' failed.
4 participants