Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RegisterCoalescer] Fix reuse of instruction pointers #73519

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 22 additions & 1 deletion llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1031,6 +1031,19 @@ RegisterCoalescer::removeCopyByCommutingDef(const CoalescerPair &CP,
return { true, ShrinkB };
}

// Replace the given MachineInstr * with nullptr inside a work list. Used to
// remove an instruction when its pointer is reused. Returns true if replaced,
// false otherwise.
static bool removeFromWorkList(MutableArrayRef<MachineInstr *> WorkList,
MachineInstr *MI) {
auto It = std::find(WorkList.begin(), WorkList.end(), MI);
if (It != WorkList.end()) {
*It = nullptr;
return true;
}
return false;
}

/// For copy B = A in BB2, if A is defined by A = B in BB0 which is a
/// predecessor of BB2, and if B is not redefined on the way from A = B
/// in BB0 to B = A in BB2, B = A in BB2 is partially redundant if the
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1190,7 +1203,15 @@ bool RegisterCoalescer::removePartialRedundancy(const CoalescerPair &CP,
// If the newly created Instruction has an address of an instruction that was
// deleted before (object recycled by the allocator) it needs to be removed from
Comment on lines 1203 to 1204
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really trust this system of relying on deleted instruction pointers. Is there a better way to handle this?

// the deleted list.
ErasedInstrs.erase(NewCopyMI);
bool WasErased = ErasedInstrs.erase(NewCopyMI);
// Also remove the deleted instruction from work lists. There shouldn't be
// duplicate instructions there.
if (WasErased) {
// Attempt to remove from WorkList. If not found, it could be in
// LocalWorkList.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the partial redundancy case, can't it only be in the global worklist?

if (!removeFromWorkList(WorkList, NewCopyMI))
removeFromWorkList(LocalWorkList, NewCopyMI);
}
} else {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tremovePartialRedundancy: Remove the copy from "
<< printMBBReference(MBB) << '\t' << CopyMI);
Expand Down