Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for https between kube-loxilb and loxilb-lb #34

Closed
UltraInstinct14 opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Support for https between kube-loxilb and loxilb-lb #34

UltraInstinct14 opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@UltraInstinct14
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@UltraInstinct14 UltraInstinct14 added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 25, 2023
@TakhNat
Copy link

TakhNat commented Mar 7, 2024

I am also in need of this. Any updates ??

@UltraInstinct14
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The PR #186 has been merged. @TakhNat Can you please double check. Now the loxiURL need to be provided as https or http as needed.

@sososo0 I would suggest adding a CICD test-case to validate your changes ? Probably the test could be modified for the same !!

@sososo0
Copy link
Contributor

sososo0 commented Oct 13, 2024

@UltraInstinct14 Thank you for the suggestion! I will review how I can add the CICD test case.

UltraInstinct14 added a commit to loxilb-io/loxilb that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2024
loxilb-io/kube-loxilb#34 Initial patch to facilitate https by default
UltraInstinct14 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2024
gh-34 refresh ssl certs if new rootCA mount is detected
UltraInstinct14 added a commit to loxilb-io/loxilb that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2024
loxilb-io/kube-loxilb#34 Converted ingress cicd to use kube-loxilb https loxiurl
@TrekkieCoder
Copy link
Collaborator

This has been verified and guide to use this has also been updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants