Development: Fix architecture tests for exam deletion summary
#9458
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
tests
server
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to several classes primarily related to access control and testing. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/ExamDeletionIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
1-165: Great job on following test guidelines. Consider adding DB query tracking.The test class adheres well to most of the provided coding guidelines:
- Descriptive test naming
- Small, specific tests
- Use of JUnit 5 features
- Use of assertThat for assertions
- Likely enforcement of package rules through AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest
- Context restart minimization with @testinstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
- Use of fixed data in the setup method
To further improve the test, consider:
- Adding DB query count tracking to monitor performance, especially for the
testDeletionSummarymethod.- If not already implemented in the parent class, ensure the util service factory pattern is utilized for creating test data.
Would you like assistance in implementing DB query count tracking for the
testDeletionSummarymethod?src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/util/ExamUtilService.java (1)
Line range hint
1-1007: Compliance with coding guidelines for test files.The changes in this file comply with the relevant coding guidelines for test files, particularly:
- Avoiding direct database access: The switch to
PostTestRepositorysupports this guideline.- Mock strategy: The use of a test-specific repository aligns with the static mocks strategy.
As a utility service, some guidelines (e.g., test naming, size, assert usage) are not directly applicable to this class. However, the
ExamUtilServiceprovides methods that support the implementation of these guidelines in actual test classes.To further improve compliance with the coding guidelines, consider:
- Ensuring that methods in this utility class promote small, specific tests in the classes that use it.
- Verifying that the methods support the use of
assertThatin the actual test classes.- Checking if the utility methods allow for tracking database query counts in performance tests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/web/admin/AdminCourseResource.java (0 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/service/CourseServiceTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/ExamDeletionIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/util/ExamUtilService.java (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/web/admin/AdminCourseResource.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/service/CourseServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/ExamDeletionIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/util/ExamUtilService.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/ExamDeletionIntegrationTest.java (2)
23-23: LGTM: Import statements for test repositories added.The addition of import statements for
StudentExamTestRepositoryandBuildJobTestRepositoryaligns with the transition to test-specific repositories. This change supports the guideline to avoid direct database access in tests.Also applies to: 31-31
46-46: Excellent: Test repositories properly implemented.The change from production repositories to test-specific repositories (
StudentExamTestRepositoryandBuildJobTestRepository) is a positive step. This modification:
- Aligns with the guideline to avoid direct database access in tests.
- Supports the mock strategy of using static mocks.
- Enhances test isolation and potentially improves test performance.
These changes contribute to more reliable and maintainable tests.
Also applies to: 52-52
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/service/CourseServiceTest.java (2)
41-41: LGTM: Appropriate use of test-specific repositoryThe change from
BuildJobRepositorytoBuildJobTestRepositoryaligns with best practices for unit testing by using test-specific dependencies. This helps in isolating tests from production code and potential side effects.
Line range hint
391-399: Verify behavior of createBuildJob method with new test repositoryWhile the changes to use
BuildJobTestRepositoryare appropriate, it's crucial to ensure that thecreateBuildJobmethod behaves as expected with the new test repository. Please review this method and its usage in tests to confirm that:
- The test repository provides the same interface as the production repository.
- The behavior of
saveoperation in the test repository matches the expectations of the tests.- Any test cases relying on specific behavior of the build job repository still function correctly.
To assist in this verification, you can run the following commands:
✅ Verification successful
Verify Replacement of
buildJobRepowithBuildJobTestRepositoryThe substitution of
buildJobRepowithBuildJobTestRepositoryappears consistent across all test classes. Please ensure that:
BuildJobTestRepositoryimplements all methods used by the tests (e.g.,save,deleteAll).- The behavior of these methods matches that of the production repository to maintain test integrity.
- The
createBuildJobmethod functions correctly with the new test repository in all test cases.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the usage of createBuildJob and buildJobRepo in tests # Find all occurrences of createBuildJob method in test files echo "Occurrences of createBuildJob in tests:" rg --type java -g "src/test/**/*.java" "createBuildJob" # Find all usages of buildJobRepo in test files echo "Usages of buildJobRepo in tests:" rg --type java -g "src/test/**/*.java" "buildJobRepo"Length of output: 8605
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/exam/util/ExamUtilService.java (3)
23-23: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been correctly updated to use
PostTestRepositoryinstead ofPostRepository. This change aligns with the best practice of using test-specific repositories in test environments, which helps in isolating tests from the production database.
140-140: LGTM: Field declaration updated correctly.The field declaration has been properly updated to use
PostTestRepositoryinstead ofPostRepository. This change is consistent with the import statement modification and ensures that the test-specific repository is used throughout the class. It adheres to the best practice of using mock or test-specific repositories in test environments.
23-23: Overall changes look good and align with test best practices.The modifications in this file are consistent and well-implemented:
- The import statement has been updated to use
PostTestRepository.- The field declaration has been changed to use
PostTestRepository.These changes align with the coding guidelines for test files, particularly the practice of avoiding direct database access in tests. The use of a test-specific repository helps in isolating tests from the production database and allows for better control over test data.
The overall functionality of the
ExamUtilServiceclass remains unchanged, with only the repository type being switched to a test-specific version. This change enhances the reliability and isolation of tests using this utility service.Also applies to: 140-140
| @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ class CourseServiceTest extends AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest { | |||
| private StudentParticipationTestRepository studentParticipationRepo; | |||
|
|
|||
| @Autowired | |||
| private BuildJobRepository buildJobRepo; | |||
| private BuildJobTestRepository buildJobRepo; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Found: Test Repository Extends Production Repository
The BuildJobTestRepository still extends BuildJobRepository, which creates a dependency on the production repository within the test code. This can lead to unintended side effects and violates the principle of isolating tests from production code.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/test_repository/BuildJobTestRepository.java
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Consistent use of test repository
The field declaration change is consistent with the import modification, ensuring the use of BuildJobTestRepository throughout the test class. This maintains the integrity of using test-specific dependencies.
To ensure this change doesn't inadvertently affect existing tests, please run the following verification:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all tests using buildJobRepo still pass and that no production BuildJobRepository is used in tests.
# Test 1: Run all tests in CourseServiceTest
./gradlew test --tests "de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.core.service.CourseServiceTest"
# Test 2: Check for any remaining uses of BuildJobRepository in test files
rg --type java -g "src/test/**/*.java" "BuildJobRepository"
Length of output: 651
Checklist
Motivation
After merging #9185, some architecture tests fail. These changes fixes that.
General
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests