-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add dummy precompile hook with rust and typescript tests #478
Merged
+97
−2
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
51 changes: 51 additions & 0 deletions
51
test/suites/dev-frontier-template/test-eth-asset-address/test-eth-asset-address-creation.ts
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ | ||
import { expect, describeSuite } from "@moonwall/cli"; | ||
import { STATEMINT_LOCATION_EXAMPLE } from "../../../util/constants.ts"; | ||
import { alith } from "@moonwall/util"; | ||
|
||
describeSuite({ | ||
id: "DF0901", | ||
title: "Ethereum asset dummy precompile address creation", | ||
foundationMethods: "dev", | ||
testCases: ({ context, it }) => { | ||
it({ | ||
id: "T01", | ||
title: "dummy precompile address is created when creating the asset and removed when destroyed", | ||
test: async function () { | ||
const assetId = 5; | ||
const assetIdAddress = new Uint8Array([ | ||
255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 0, 5, | ||
]); | ||
const revertBytecode = "0x60006000fd"; | ||
const addressInHex = "0x" + Buffer.from(assetIdAddress).toString("hex"); | ||
|
||
await context.createBlock( | ||
context | ||
.polkadotJs() | ||
.tx.sudo.sudo( | ||
context | ||
.polkadotJs() | ||
.tx.foreignAssetsCreator.createForeignAsset( | ||
STATEMINT_LOCATION_EXAMPLE, | ||
assetId, | ||
alith.address, | ||
true, | ||
1 | ||
) | ||
) | ||
); | ||
|
||
// After the foreign asset creation, the address should contain revert byte code. | ||
expect(await context.web3().eth.getCode(addressInHex)).to.equal(revertBytecode); | ||
|
||
await context.createBlock( | ||
context | ||
.polkadotJs() | ||
.tx.sudo.sudo(context.polkadotJs().tx.foreignAssetsCreator.destroyForeignAsset(assetId)) | ||
); | ||
|
||
// After the foreign asset destruction, the revert bytecode from that address should be removed. | ||
expect(await context.web3().eth.getCode(addressInHex)).to.equal("0x"); | ||
}, | ||
}); | ||
}, | ||
}); |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we don't need this test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently
asset_id_to_account
takesprefix
as slice, instead of hard bound array. Then it does invokecopy_from_slice
, which can panic, if the slice's size is not exact.If the implementation changes tomorrow (i.e the expected size of the slice in the implementation), it need to be captured by the unit test (otherwise you would see panic during integration test or worse in dev environment). Which this test prevents.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's discuss this offline. I am merging this as it is not blocker as of now.