PM: in-kernel: `MPTCP_INFO`: document and support `mptcpi_subflows` for the server side #330

matttbe · 2022-12-20T13:44:31Z

Linked to #327, mptcpi_subflows is not clear: it counts the number of additional subflows a client using the in-kernel PM has established (or are being established).

We can probably document that it counts the additional subflows (still confusing). It is too late to return +1 I suppose. Or we need a new field.
The userspace PM (see #329) and the server side for the in-kernel PM should probably be supported as well.

If we end up only documenting the current behaviour and increment the counter for the server side, I suppose this can be considered as a bug fix. If a new field is added or a +1 is done, that's different I think

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Increase pm subflows counter when userspace pm creates a new subflow, and decrease the counter when it closes a subflow. Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#329 Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#330 Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>

This patch adds the mptcp_info fields test cases. Add a new function chk_mptcp_info() to check the given field number. Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#330 Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>

This patch adds the mptcp_info fields test cases, using '-D' option to trigger it. Add a new function chk_mptcp_info() to check the given number of the given mptcp_info field. Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#330 Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>

This patch adds the mptcp_info fields tests in endpoint_tests(). Add a new function chk_mptcp_info() to check the given number of the given mptcp_info field. Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#330 Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>

This patch adds the mptcp_info fields tests in endpoint_tests(). Add a new function chk_mptcp_info() to check the given number of the given mptcp_info field. Closes: #330 Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>

This patch adds the mptcp_info fields tests in endpoint_tests(). Add a new function chk_mptcp_info() to check the given number of the given mptcp_info field. Link: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#330 Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Enable the cpu v4 tests for LoongArch. Currently, we don't have BPF trampoline in LoongArch JIT, so the fentry test `test_ptr_struct_arg` still failed, will followup. Test result attached below: # ./test_progs -t verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap #316/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK #316/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK #316/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK #316/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK #316/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK #316/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK #316 verifier_bswap:OK #330/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK #330/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK #330 verifier_gotol:OK #338/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK #338/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK #338/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK #338/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK #338/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK #338/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK #338/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK #338/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK #338/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK #338/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK #338/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK #338 verifier_ldsx:OK #349/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK #349/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK #349/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK #349/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK #349/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK #349/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK #349/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK #349/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK #349/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK #349/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK #349/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK #349/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK #349/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK #349/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK #349/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK #349/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK #349/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK #349/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK #349/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK #349/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK #349/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK #349/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK #349/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK #349/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK #349 verifier_movsx:OK #361/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #361/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #361/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #361/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #361/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #361/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #361/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK #361/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #361/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK #361/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #361/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #361/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #361/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #361/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #361/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #361/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #361/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK #361/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #361/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK #361/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #361/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #361/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #361/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #361/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #361/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #361/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #361/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #361/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #361/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #361/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #361/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #361/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #361/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #361/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #361/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #361/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #361/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #361/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #361/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #361/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #361/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #361/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #361/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #361/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #361/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #361/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #361/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #361/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #361/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #361/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #361/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK #361/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #361/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK #361/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #361/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #361/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #361/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #361/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #361/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #361/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #361/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #361/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #361/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #361/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #361/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #361/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #361/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK #361/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #361/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK #361/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #361/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK #361/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #361/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK #361/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #361/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK #361/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #361/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK #361/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #361 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 5/163 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL #116/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK #116/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK #116 ldsx_insn:FAIL All error logs: test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__open 0 nsec test_map_val_and_probed_memory:PASS:test_ldsx_insn__load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: prog 'test_ptr_struct_arg': failed to auto-attach: -524 test_map_val_and_probed_memory:FAIL:test_ldsx_insn__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) #116/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:FAIL #116 ldsx_insn:FAIL Summary: 0/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations. Translating the below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the fairness of r/w semaphores). CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 1 lock(&kvm->slots_lock); 2 lock(&vcpu->mutex); 3 lock(&kvm->srcu); 4 lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); 5 lock(kvm_lock); 6 lock(&kvm->slots_lock); 7 lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); 8 sync(&kvm->srcu); Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(): cpuhp_cpufreq_online() | -> cpufreq_online() | -> cpufreq_gov_performance_limits() | -> __cpufreq_driver_target() | -> __target_index() | -> cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() | -> cpufreq_notify_transition() | -> ... __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier() But, actually triggering such deadlocks is beyond rare due to the combination of dependencies and timings involved. E.g. the cpufreq notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant TSC, mucking with the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very uncommon, and doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to generate contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual. The most robust solution to the general cpu_hotplug_lock issue is likely to switch vm_list to be an RCU-protected list, e.g. so that x86's cpufreq notifier doesn't to take kvm_lock. For now, settle for fixing the most blatant deadlock, as switching to an RCU-protected list is a much more involved change, but add a comment in locking.rst to call out that care needs to be taken when walking holding kvm_lock and walking vm_list. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S O ------------------------------------------------------ tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock: ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0 static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30 kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm] kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm] kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm] vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel] __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0 synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30 kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm] kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm] __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30 lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260 __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm] param_attr_store+0x93/0x100 module_attr_store+0x22/0x40 sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x28d/0x380 ksys_write+0x70/0xe0 __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60 do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com> Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> Tested-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-ID: <20240830043600.127750-2-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

matttbe added the enhancement label Dec 20, 2022

matttbe mentioned this issue Jan 9, 2023

PM: userspace: update MPTCP_INFO fields #329

Closed

geliangtang self-assigned this Jan 9, 2023

matttbe changed the title ~~MPTCP_INFO: document and support mptcpi_subflows for the server side~~ MPTCP_INFO: document and support mptcpi_subflows for the server side with the in-kernel PM Feb 8, 2023

matttbe added the pm path-manager label Feb 8, 2023

matttbe changed the title ~~MPTCP_INFO: document and support mptcpi_subflows for the server side with the in-kernel PM~~ PM: in-kernel: MPTCP_INFO: document and support mptcpi_subflows for the server side Feb 8, 2023

matttbe closed this as completed in f8c10bb Mar 9, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

PM: in-kernel: `MPTCP_INFO`: document and support `mptcpi_subflows` for the server side #330

PM: in-kernel: `MPTCP_INFO`: document and support `mptcpi_subflows` for the server side #330

matttbe commented Dec 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

PM: in-kernel: MPTCP_INFO: document and support mptcpi_subflows for the server side #330

PM: in-kernel: MPTCP_INFO: document and support mptcpi_subflows for the server side #330

Comments

matttbe commented Dec 20, 2022 • edited Loading

PM: in-kernel: `MPTCP_INFO`: document and support `mptcpi_subflows` for the server side #330

PM: in-kernel: `MPTCP_INFO`: document and support `mptcpi_subflows` for the server side #330

matttbe commented Dec 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading