[ISSUE #1458]🔥Refactor rocketmq-client crate error handle🚨 #1459
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve refactoring the error handling mechanisms across multiple files in the RocketMQ client and broker components. Key modifications include updating error types to utilize a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (42)
rocketmq-client/src/lib.rs (1)
23-27: Consider documenting the error handling architectureSince this is part of a larger error handling refactoring effort, it would be beneficial to add documentation explaining the new error handling architecture and the rationale behind separating client errors.
Consider adding a module-level documentation comment above
pub mod client_errorexplaining:
- The purpose of the client error module
- How it fits into the overall error handling strategy
- Any guidelines for error handling in the codebase
+/// Client-specific error types and handling mechanisms. +/// +/// This module contains error types specific to RocketMQ client operations, +/// providing detailed error information for client-side operations. pub mod client_error;rocketmq-tools/src/tools_error.rs (1)
22-22: Consider adding migration guide documentationSince this changes the error module path, which could be a breaking change, consider documenting the migration path for users.
Would you like me to help create a migration guide section for the documentation?
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_error.rs (1)
Line range hint
39-65: Add test coverage for ClientError variantWhile the error enum has good test coverage for other variants, there's no test case for the
ClientErrorvariant. Consider adding a test to maintain consistency with the existing test pattern.#[cfg(test)] mod tests { use rocketmq_remoting::remoting_error::RemotingError; + use rocketmq_client_rust::client_error::MQClientError; use super::*; + #[test] + fn client_error_displays_correctly() { + let error = BrokerError::ClientError(MQClientError::new("client error")); + assert_eq!(format!("{}", error), "Client error: client error"); + } // ... existing tests ... }rocketmq-client/src/producer/request_future_holder.rs (2)
68-71: Enhance error message with request detailsWhile the structured error handling with error codes is good, the error message could be more informative by including request-specific details.
let cause = Box::new(RequestTimeoutError(RequestTimeoutErr::new_with_code( ClientErrorCode::REQUEST_TIMEOUT_EXCEPTION, - "request timeout, no reply message.", + &format!("request timeout after {}ms, no reply message received", rf.get_timeout_milliseconds()), )));
Line range hint
1-108: Architecture maintains thread safety with improved error handlingThe refactored error handling integrates well with the existing architecture:
- Preserves thread-safe request future management with Arc/RwLock
- Maintains proper async/await patterns
- Cleanly separates error handling from business logic
Consider documenting the error handling patterns used here in the crate's documentation to ensure consistent usage across the codebase.
rocketmq-client/src/utils/message_util.rs (1)
76-82: Consider adding documentation for error scenarios.To improve maintainability, consider adding documentation comments that describe:
- When this error can occur
- How to handle or recover from this error
- Any specific conditions that might trigger this error
Example documentation:
/// Creates a reply message from a request message. /// /// # Errors /// /// Returns `ClientErrorCode::CREATE_REPLY_MESSAGE_EXCEPTION` when: /// - The cluster property is missing in the request message /// - The request message doesn't contain required reply propertiesrocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_admin_impl.rs (2)
Line range hint
123-125: Track unimplemented methodsThe
search_offsetmethod is marked as unimplemented. This should be tracked and implemented to complete the API.Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of this method?
Line range hint
99-102: Consider improving error handling for Option unwrappingUsing
expect()for unwrapping Options could lead to runtime panics. Consider using proper error propagation instead.Consider this pattern:
- let client = self.client.as_mut().expect("client is None"); + let client = self.client.as_mut() + .ok_or_else(|| MQClientErr(ClientErr::new("Client not initialized".to_string())))?;rocketmq-client/src/base/validators.rs (1)
64-67: Consider consolidating error codes in check_message methodThe method consistently uses
ResponseCode::MessageIllegalfor different validation failures. Consider creating specific error codes for each validation case to improve error handling granularity.+ // Consider adding these constants to ResponseCode + const MESSAGE_BODY_NULL: i32 = /* new code */; + const MESSAGE_BODY_EMPTY: i32 = /* new code */; + const MESSAGE_BODY_OVERSIZED: i32 = /* new code */; + const MESSAGE_INVALID_DISPATCH: i32 = /* new code */; if msg.get_body().is_none() { - return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( - ResponseCode::MessageIllegal as i32, + return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( + MESSAGE_BODY_NULL, "the message body is null".to_string(), ))); }Also applies to: 74-77, 82-85, 89-95, 103-110
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/store/local_file_offset_store.rs (2)
92-95: Consider enhancing the error message with file path context.The error handling improvement is good, but consider including the file path in the error message for better debugging context.
- "Failed to deserialize local offset: {}", - e + "Failed to deserialize local offset from '{}': {}", + self.store_path, e
92-95: Consider architectural improvements for error handling consistency.Several improvements could enhance maintainability and consistency:
- Create a dedicated method for file path construction to avoid duplication
- Establish consistent error message formatting across the codebase
- Consider creating error constants or an error factory for common error cases
Example implementation:
impl LocalFileOffsetStore { fn get_backup_path(&self) -> String { format!("{}.bak", self.store_path) } fn create_deserialization_error(&self, path: &str, error: impl std::error::Error) -> MQClientError { MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( "Failed to deserialize offset from '{}': {}", path, error ))) } }Also applies to: 107-110
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/pull_callback.rs (1)
179-182: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new error typeThe refactoring from
MQBrokerErrortoMQClientBrokerErrormaintains the existing error handling logic while improving error type specificity. The changes handle both subscription and flow control cases appropriately.Consider adding documentation comments explaining:
- The scenarios where
MQClientBrokerErroris used- The difference between the old and new error types
- The relationship between broker errors and client errors
match er { + // MQClientBrokerError represents broker-related errors that occur during client operations MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError(broker_error) => {Also applies to: 210-212
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/store/remote_broker_offset_store.rs (2)
113-116: Fix indentation for consistencyWhile the error handling logic is correct, the indentation of these lines is inconsistent with the rest of the file.
- Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "broker not found, {}", - mq.get_broker_name() - )))) + Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "broker not found, {}", + mq.get_broker_name() + ))))
323-326: Consider extracting common error handlingThis error handling pattern is identical to the one in
fetch_consume_offset_from_broker. Consider extracting it into a helper method to avoid duplication.+ impl RemoteBrokerOffsetStore { + fn broker_not_found_error(&self, broker_name: &str) -> MQClientError { + MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "broker not found, {}", + broker_name + ))) + } + } - Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "broker not found, {}", - mq.get_broker_name() - )))) + Err(self.broker_not_found_error(mq.get_broker_name()))Also, fix the indentation to match the rest of the file:
- Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "broker not found, {}", - mq.get_broker_name() - )))) + Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "broker not found, {}", + mq.get_broker_name() + ))))rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pull_api_wrapper.rs (1)
364-367: Enhance error message with more contextWhile the error handling follows the new pattern, the error message could be more informative for debugging purposes.
Consider enhancing the error message:
- Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "The broker[{}] not exist", - mq.get_broker_name(), - )))) + Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "Failed to find broker[{}] in subscription. Broker might be offline or not registered.", + mq.get_broker_name(), + ))))rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_push_impl.rs (1)
276-278: Enhance error messages with specific failure reasonsThe error messages could be more descriptive about the actual failure reasons:
- For the default consumer implementation check, specify why it might be None
- For the system error case, include the actual offset value in the error message
- return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( - "default_mqpush_consumer_impl is none", - ))); + return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( + "DefaultMQPushConsumerImpl is not initialized or has been dropped", + ))); - return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( - ResponseCode::SystemError.into(), - "Failed to query consume offset from offset store", - ))); + return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( + ResponseCode::SystemError.into(), + format!("Invalid consume offset {} returned from store", result), + )));Also applies to: 373-376
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_impl.rs (1)
Line range hint
12-24: Consider further refactoring opportunitiesThe code could benefit from additional refactoring to improve maintainability and error handling:
- Extract the complex rebalancing logic into smaller, focused methods
- Create a common error handling pattern for timeout and broker communication errors
- Consider using a builder pattern for the complex initialization in
RebalanceImplExample for error handling extraction:
+ fn handle_query_timeout(&self, topic: &CheetahString, retry_times: u32) -> bool { + if retry_times >= TIMEOUT_CHECK_TIMES { + let mut topic_client_rebalance = self.topic_client_rebalance.write().await; + topic_client_rebalance.insert(topic.clone(), topic.clone()); + return false; + } + true + } match self.client_instance.as_mut().unwrap().query_assignment(...).await { Ok(_) => { ... } Err(e) => match e { - MQClientError::RequestTimeoutError(_) => {} + MQClientError::RequestTimeoutError(_) => self.handle_query_timeout(topic, retry_times), _ => { error!("tryQueryAssignment error {}.", e); let mut topic_client_rebalance = self.topic_client_rebalance.write().await;Also applies to: 167-173
rocketmq-client/src/producer/default_mq_producer.rs (1)
494-496: Consider adding more context to the error messageWhile the error handling has been improved by using
ClientErr::new, the error message could be more informative by including the actual error details fromerr.Consider this improvement:
- Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( - "Failed to initiate the MessageBatch", - ))) + Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( + format!("Failed to initiate the MessageBatch: {}", err) + )))rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs (1)
Line range hint
976-989: Consider extracting the long error message to a constantWhile the error handling is well-structured, the long error message could be moved to a constant for better maintainability and reusability.
+ const UNSUPPORTED_FILTER_ERROR: &str = + "Check client in broker error, maybe because you use {} to filter message, \ + but server has not been upgraded to support!This error would not affect \ + the launch of consumer, but may has impact on message receiving if you \ + have use the new features which are not supported by server, please check \ + the log!"; match e { MQClientErr(err) => { return Err(MQClientErr(err)); } _ => { - let desc = format!( - "Check client in broker error, maybe because you use {} to \ - filter message, but server has not been upgraded to support!\ - This error would not affect the launch of consumer, but may \ - has impact on message receiving if you have use the new \ - features which are not supported by server, please check the log!", - subscription_data.expression_type - ); + let desc = format!(UNSUPPORTED_FILTER_ERROR, + subscription_data.expression_type); return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(desc))); } }rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (1)
Line range hint
451-611: Consider extracting repeated error handling pattern into a helper function.While the error handling has been properly refactored to use
ClientErr::new, there's significant repetition in the error handling pattern. Consider extracting the common pattern into a helper function to improve maintainability.Example implementation:
fn config_error(message: impl Into<String>) -> Result<()> { Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( "{}{}", message.into(), FAQUrl::suggest_todo(FAQUrl::CLIENT_PARAMETER_CHECK_URL) )))) }This would simplify the validation checks to:
if self.consumer_config.consumer_group.is_empty() { return config_error("consumer_group is empty"); }rocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs (2)
117-119: Consider makingerror_messagea required fieldThe
error_messagefield is always set toSome(error_message)in the constructors. Making it a non-optional field can simplify the code and reduce the need forOptionwrapping.Apply this diff to change
error_messageto a mandatory field:pub struct ClientErr { response_code: i32, - error_message: Option<CheetahString>, + error_message: CheetahString, message: CheetahString, } impl ClientErr { pub fn new(error_message: impl Into<CheetahString>) -> Self { let error_message = error_message.into(); let message = FAQUrl::attach_default_url(Some(error_message.as_str())); Self { response_code: -1, - error_message: Some(error_message), + error_message, message: CheetahString::from(message), } }Repeat similar changes for
MQBrokerErrandRequestTimeoutErrif appropriate.
24-44: Ensure consistency in error messages and variantsThe
MQClientErrorenum contains variants with different patterns of error messages. Consider standardizing the error messages for consistency and better maintainability.For example, you can refactor
OffsetNotFoundErrorto include a structured error type similar to other variants:- #[error("Client exception occurred: CODE:{0}, broker address:{1}, Message:{2}")] - OffsetNotFoundError(i32, String, String), + #[error("{0}")] + OffsetNotFoundError(OffsetNotFoundErr),Define
OffsetNotFoundErras:#[derive(Error, Debug)] #[error("{message}")] pub struct OffsetNotFoundErr { response_code: i32, broker_addr: CheetahString, error_message: CheetahString, message: CheetahString, }rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs (8)
87-91: Streamline Import Statements for Error TypesThe imports for error types can be consolidated to improve readability and maintainability.
Apply this diff to group the related imports:
-use crate::client_error::ClientErr; -use crate::client_error::MQBrokerErr; -use crate::client_error::MQClientError; -use crate::client_error::MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError; -use crate::client_error::MQClientError::MQClientErr; +use crate::client_error::{ + ClientErr, + MQBrokerErr, + MQClientError::{self, MQClientBrokerError, MQClientErr}, +};
257-266: Simplify Error Handling Logic inget_topic_route_info_from_name_server_detailThe error is returned twice with similar code. This redundancy can be eliminated to streamline the function.
Refactor the error handling to return the error directly within the match arm:
_ => { - return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( - code, - result.remark().cloned().unwrap_or_default().to_string(), - ))) + Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( + code, + result.remark().cloned().unwrap_or_default().to_string(), + ))) } } - Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( - code, - result.remark().cloned().unwrap_or_default().to_string(), - )))
687-692: Refactor Error Creation insend_heartbeatThe construction of the error can be simplified to enhance readability.
Consider creating a helper function or method to construct
MQClientErrorfrom the response:- Err(MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError( - MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker( - response.code(), - response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()), - addr.to_string(), - ), - )) + Err(MQClientError::from_broker_response(&response, addr))Assuming you implement
from_broker_responsemethod accordingly.
772-777: Eliminate Redundant Error Return inget_consumer_id_list_by_groupThere's an unnecessary return statement in the match arm that can be removed for cleaner code.
Refactor to directly return the error without the
returnkeyword:_ => { - return Err(MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError( + Err(MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError( MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker( response.code(), response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()), addr.to_string(), ), )) - ); }
874-879: Enhance Error Messaging inquery_consumer_offsetThe error message lacks context, which can make debugging more difficult.
Include additional details such as the topic and consumer group:
- Err(MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError( + Err(MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError(MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker( response.code(), response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()), addr.to_string(), + format!("Failed to query offset for topic '{}' and consumer group '{}'", request_header.topic, request_header.consumer_group) )))
1043-1047: Refactor Error Handling inconsumer_send_message_backTo reduce code duplication, consider creating a helper function for constructing broker errors.
Implement a method to handle error creation:
- Err(MQClientBrokerError(MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker( - response.code(), - response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()), - addr.to_string(), - ))) + Err(MQClientError::from_broker_response(&response, addr))
1228-1232: Simplify Error Construction inget_max_offsetYou can refactor the error creation to enhance code clarity and reduce repetition.
Use a common error handling method or macro to construct the error:
- Err(MQClientBrokerError(MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker( - response.code(), - response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()), - addr.to_string(), - ))) + Err(MQClientError::from_broker_response(&response, addr))
1314-1318: Enhance Error Information inquery_assignmentProviding more context in error messages aids in debugging and usability.
Include the topic, consumer group, and other relevant details in the error message:
- Err(MQClientBrokerError(MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker( - response.code(), - response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()), - addr.to_string(), - ))) + Err(MQClientBrokerError(MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker( + response.code(), + format!( + "Failed to query assignment for topic '{}', consumer group '{}': {}", + request_body.topic, + request_body.consumer_group, + response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()) + ), + addr.to_string(), + )))rocketmq-client/src/producer/producer_impl/default_mq_producer_impl.rs (12)
62-67: Consolidate imports fromclient_errormoduleMultiple items are being imported individually from the
client_errormodule. For better readability and maintainability, consider consolidating these imports.Apply this diff to consolidate the imports:
-use crate::client_error::ClientErr; -use crate::client_error::MQClientError; -use crate::client_error::MQClientError::MQClientErr; -use crate::client_error::MQClientError::RemotingTooMuchRequestError; -use crate::client_error::MQClientError::RequestTimeoutError; -use crate::client_error::RequestTimeoutErr; +use crate::client_error::{ + ClientErr, + MQClientError::{self, MQClientErr, RemotingTooMuchRequestError, RequestTimeoutError}, + RequestTimeoutErr, +};
262-266: Clarify error message for topic mismatchThe error message could be more precise to aid in debugging when the message topic does not match the message queue topic.
Consider rephrasing the error message:
-return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "message topic [{}] is not equal with message queue topic [{}]", - msg.get_topic(), - mq.get_topic() -)))); +return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "Message topic '{}' does not match the message queue topic '{}'", + msg.get_topic(), + mq.get_topic() +))));
429-431: Improve null message queue selection error handlingThe error returned when
select message queuereturnsnullcould include more context or suggestions.Update the error message to provide additional guidance:
-return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( - "select message queue return null.", -))); +return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( + "Message queue selection returned None. Ensure that the selector function is correctly implemented and returns a valid MessageQueue.", +)));
Line range hint
775-798: Handle specific error variants explicitlyIn the match statement handling errors, consider handling specific
MQClientErrorvariants explicitly to improve error granularity and future maintainability.Adjust the match arms to handle each error variant:
-match err { - MQClientError::MQClientErr(_) => { + MQClientError::MQClientErr(ref client_err) => { // Handle MQClientErr } - MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError(ref er) => { + MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError(ref broker_err) => { // Handle MQClientBrokerError } // Add additional match arms for other error variants as needed _ => { return Err(err); } }
878-913: Refactor repetitive error wrappingThe code repetitively wraps various
MQClientErrorvariants intoMQClientErrwith the sameClientErrorCode. This repetition can be reduced for cleaner code.Simplify the error handling using a helper function or by matching multiple patterns:
-if let Some(err) = exception { - match err { - MQClientError::MQClientErr(_) | - MQClientError::RemotingTooMuchRequestError(_) | - MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError(_) | - MQClientError::RequestTimeoutError(_) | - MQClientError::OffsetNotFoundError(_, _, _) | - MQClientError::RemotingError(_) => { - Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( - ClientErrorCode::BROKER_NOT_EXIST_EXCEPTION, - info, - ))) - } - _ => { - unimplemented!("not support error type"); - } - } -} else { - Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(info))) -} +if let Some(err) = exception { + match err { + MQClientError::MQClientErr(_) + | MQClientError::RemotingTooMuchRequestError(_) + | MQClientError::MQClientBrokerError(_) + | MQClientError::RequestTimeoutError(_) + | MQClientError::OffsetNotFoundError(_, _, _) + | MQClientError::RemotingError(_) => { + Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( + ClientErrorCode::BROKER_NOT_EXIST_EXCEPTION, + info, + ))) + } + _ => { + unimplemented!("Unsupported error type"); + } + } +} else { + Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(info))) +}
990-993: Handle missing broker address more gracefullyWhen the broker address is not found, consider providing more actionable guidance or retries.
Enhance the error handling to attempt to update routing information before failing:
-if broker_addr.is_none() { - return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "The broker[{}] not exist", - broker_name, - )))); +if broker_addr.is_none() { + // Attempt to refresh routing information + self.try_to_find_topic_publish_info(mq.get_topic_cs()).await; + broker_addr = self + .client_instance + .as_ref() + .unwrap() + .find_broker_address_in_publish(broker_name.as_ref()) + .await; + if broker_addr.is_none() { + return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "The broker '{}' does not exist after route refresh", + broker_name, + )))); + } }
1287-1293: Ensure name server addresses are properly configuredThe error message suggests no name server address is set. Provide additional instructions to guide users on how to set it.
Consider updating the error message:
-return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( - ClientErrorCode::NO_NAME_SERVER_EXCEPTION, - format!( - "No name remoting_server address, please set it. {}", - FAQUrl::suggest_todo(FAQUrl::NAME_SERVER_ADDR_NOT_EXIST_URL) - ), -))); +return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( + ClientErrorCode::NO_NAME_SERVER_EXCEPTION, + "No name server address is configured. Please set the name server address using 'client_config.set_namesrv_addr(...)' or ensure that the 'NAMESRV_ADDR' environment variable is set.".to_string(), +)));
1341-1345: Check producer service state before operationThe error message when the producer service state is not running can be more informative.
Update the error message to include the current service state:
-return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "The producer service state not OK, {:?} {}", - self.service_state, - FAQUrl::suggest_todo(FAQUrl::CLIENT_SERVICE_NOT_OK) -)))); +return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "The producer service state is '{:?}', expected 'Running'. Please ensure the producer is started before sending messages.", + self.service_state +))));
1395-1397: Handle None message queue selectionConsistently handle cases where message queue selection returns
None, providing clear feedback to the caller.Adjust the error handling:
-return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( - "select message queue return None.", -))); +return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( + "Message queue selection failed—received None. Please ensure the selector function is properly implemented.", +)));
1550-1551: Avoid cloning error messages unnecessarilyCloning error messages can be resource-intensive. Consider passing references where possible.
Refactor the error handling to avoid unnecessary cloning:
-request_response_future.set_cause(Box::new(MQClientError::MQClientErr( - ClientErr::new(error.to_string()), -))); +request_response_future.set_cause(Box::new(MQClientError::MQClientErr( + ClientErr::new(error.to_string()), +)));Ensure
errorimplementsToStringefficiently.
1900-1903: Provide detailed error when transaction message sending failsWhen sending a message in a transaction fails, include more context in the error to aid troubleshooting.
Improve the error message:
-return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( - "send message in transaction error, {}", - e -)))); +return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( + "Failed to send message in transaction: {}. Please check network connectivity and broker availability.", + e +))));
2257-2262: Avoid duplicate producer group registrationThe error message indicates that the producer group has been registered before. Suggest steps to resolve this issue.
Update the error message:
return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( "The producer group '{}' has already been registered. Please use a unique producer group name or ensure previous instances are properly shut down.", self.producer_config.producer_group(), ))));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_error.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/base/validators.rs(5 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs(8 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pull_api_wrapper.rs(4 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_impl.rs(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_push_impl.rs(5 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/pull_callback.rs(3 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/store/local_file_offset_store.rs(3 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/store/remote_broker_offset_store.rs(3 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/error.rs(0 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs(4 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_admin_impl.rs(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs(16 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/producer/default_mq_producer.rs(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/producer/producer_impl/default_mq_producer_impl.rs(23 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/producer/request_callback.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/producer/request_future_holder.rs(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/utils/message_util.rs(2 hunks)rocketmq-tools/src/tools_error.rs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- rocketmq-client/src/error.rs
🔇 Additional comments (44)
rocketmq-client/src/lib.rs (2)
23-23: LGTM: Import path updated correctly
The import statement has been properly updated to use the new client_error module path.
27-27: Verify all references to the old error module
The module renaming from error to client_error is more descriptive and better reflects its purpose. However, we should ensure all references are updated.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the imports to verify if they are correctly using the new module name.
All references to the error module have been correctly updated
Based on the verification results, all imports are correctly using the new client_error module name. Every reference to MQClientError is properly imported from crate::client_error, and there are no remaining references to the old error module. The module is also correctly defined in lib.rs as client_error.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all references to the old error module have been updated
# Check for any remaining references to the old error module
echo "Checking for remaining references to the old error module..."
rg -l "use.*error::MQClientError" --type rust
# Check for any potential missed imports of other types from the old error module
echo "Checking for other potential missed imports..."
rg -l "use.*error::" --type rust
# Look for any remaining references to the old module name in comments or strings
echo "Checking for references in comments or strings..."
rg -l "mod\s+error" --type rust
Length of output: 3877
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual content of imports in client files to verify if they're using the new module name
echo "Checking the actual imports in files that reference MQClientError..."
rg "use.*error::MQClientError" --type rust -A 1
# Check if there are any direct uses of 'error' module (not through full path)
echo "Checking for direct 'error' module usage..."
rg "use\s+error\s*;" --type rust
# Check the content of lib.rs to see how the module is defined and re-exported
echo "Checking lib.rs module definition..."
cat rocketmq-client/src/lib.rs
Length of output: 6221
rocketmq-client/src/producer/request_callback.rs (1)
22-22: LGTM! Verify module consistency.
The import path change aligns with the error handling refactoring objective.
Let's verify the new module structure and its consistent usage:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change verified and consistently used across the codebase
The verification confirms:
- The
client_error.rsmodule exists at the correct location - No remaining old imports using
error::MQClientError - The new import path
client_error::MQClientErroris consistently used across all relevant files in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and usage of the client_error module
# Check if the new module file exists
echo "Checking for client_error module file..."
fd "client_error\.rs$" --type f
# Check for any remaining old imports that need updating
echo "Checking for any remaining old imports..."
rg "use crate::error::MQClientError" --type rust
# Check for consistent usage of new imports
echo "Checking new import usage..."
rg "use crate::client_error::MQClientError" --type rust
Length of output: 2899
rocketmq-tools/src/tools_error.rs (1)
22-22: Verify the new client_error module path
The change from error to client_error module looks good, but let's ensure the new path is consistently used across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The change from error to client_error module is consistent with the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No references to the old
rocketmq_client_rust::error::MQClientErrorpath remain in the codebase - The new path
rocketmq_client_rust::client_error::MQClientErroris correctly used in bothrocketmq-toolsandrocketmq-broker - The change aligns with the error handling refactoring (Issue [Refactor♻️]Refactor rocketmq-client crate error handle #1458) where errors are being moved to more specific modules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of the new client_error module usage
# and ensure no old imports remain
# Check for any remaining old imports
echo "Checking for old error module imports..."
rg "rocketmq_client_rust::error::MQClientError"
# Verify the new module exists and is imported correctly elsewhere
echo "Checking usage of new client_error module..."
rg "rocketmq_client_rust::client_error::MQClientError"
# Look for potential documentation that might need updates
echo "Checking for documentation that might need updates..."
rg -g "*.md" -g "*.rs" "rocketmq_client_rust::error"
Length of output: 686
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there are any other references to the old error module
# or if there are any other files that might need updates
# Check for any files importing from rocketmq_client_rust
echo "Checking all rocketmq_client_rust imports..."
rg "use rocketmq_client_rust::" -A 2
# Check for any error-related types or modules in rocketmq_client_rust
echo "Checking error-related types..."
rg "(?i)(error|clienterror|mqclienterror)" --type rust
# Look for any potential test files that might use error types
echo "Checking test files..."
fd -e rs -g "*test*.rs" --exec rg -l "(?i)(error|clienterror|mqclienterror)" {}
Length of output: 101538
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/rebalance_strategy.rs (2)
Line range hint 30-54: Well-structured error handling implementation
The error handling implementation follows good practices:
- Clear, descriptive error messages
- Proper validation of all input parameters
- Early returns with Result type
- Appropriate logging for debugging purposes
26-26: Verify consistency of error module reorganization
The import path change from error to client_error aligns with the PR's error handling refactoring objective.
Let's verify if this change is consistently applied across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old
use crate::error::MQClientErrorimport remain - The new
use crate::client_error::MQClientErroris consistently used across 23 files in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old error module
# and verify the new client_error module usage
# Check for any remaining old imports
echo "Checking for remaining old error module imports..."
rg "use crate::error::MQClientError"
# Check new client_error module usage
echo "Checking new client_error module usage..."
rg "use crate::client_error::MQClientError"
Length of output: 2758
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_error.rs (1)
35-35: Verify the new module path exists
The change to use client_error::MQClientError aligns with the error handling refactoring objective. However, let's verify that this new module path exists and is properly exported.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the error type definition.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have verified that:
- The
MQClientErrorenum exists inrocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs - The module is properly exported in
rocketmq-client/src/lib.rswithpub mod client_error - The error type is used extensively throughout the codebase
The new module path is correctly structured and exported
The change to use client_error::MQClientError is valid as the module has been properly organized and exported. The new path aligns with Rust's module organization best practices by having error types in a dedicated module.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new client_error module exists and is properly exported
# Check if the new module path exists in the client crate
rg -A 5 "pub mod client_error"
# Verify the MQClientError type is exported
ast-grep --pattern 'pub struct MQClientError'
Length of output: 459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the client_error module content and error type definition
rg -g "*.rs" -A 10 "MQClientError" rocketmq-client/src/
# Also check if it's an enum instead of struct
ast-grep --pattern 'pub enum MQClientError'
Length of output: 113516
rocketmq-client/src/producer/request_future_holder.rs (2)
68-71: LGTM: Improved error handling structure
The refactoring to use ClientErrorCode and structured error types is a good improvement:
- Uses typed error codes instead of raw strings/numbers
- Provides a clear error construction pattern
- Maintains proper error boxing for trait objects
28-29: Verify error type naming convention consistency
The imports show two different naming patterns (RequestTimeoutError and RequestTimeoutErr). This might indicate inconsistent error type naming across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Error type naming follows consistent pattern in the codebase
The error handling pattern is actually consistent across the codebase:
RequestTimeoutErris a struct that holds the error detailsRequestTimeoutErroris a variant of theMQClientErrorenum that wraps theRequestTimeoutErrstruct- This pattern is consistently used with other error types too (e.g.,
MQBrokerErr,ClientErr)
The imports in the file are correct and follow the established error handling pattern in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency in error type naming patterns
rg -g '*.rs' '(Error|Err)\s*{.*struct' rocketmq-client/src/
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error type definitions with better regex patterns
rg -g '*.rs' 'struct.*(?:Error|Err)' rocketmq-client/src/
# Also search for enum variants with Error suffix
rg -g '*.rs' 'enum.*Error' rocketmq-client/src/
# Look for the specific error types in question
rg -g '*.rs' 'RequestTimeout(Error|Err)' rocketmq-client/src/
Length of output: 2093
rocketmq-client/src/utils/message_util.rs (2)
25-26: LGTM! Import changes align with error handling refactor.
The reorganization of error types into a dedicated client_error module improves code organization and maintainability.
76-82: LGTM! Improved error handling with better context.
The new error handling approach provides:
- Structured error with specific error code
- Clear error message indicating the missing property
- Consistent error wrapping pattern
Let's verify the error code definition:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the error code implementation to ensure it's properly defined as a constant and not an enum variant.
Error code is properly defined and used correctly
The error code CREATE_REPLY_MESSAGE_EXCEPTION is:
- Properly defined as a constant with value
10007inClientErrorCode - Used consistently in error handling within
message_util.rs - Part of a well-structured error code system with other related error codes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify CREATE_REPLY_MESSAGE_EXCEPTION error code definition
# Check for error code definition
rg -A 2 "CREATE_REPLY_MESSAGE_EXCEPTION"
# Check for any documentation or comments about this error code
ast-grep --pattern 'pub enum ClientErrorCode {
$$$
CREATE_REPLY_MESSAGE_EXCEPTION
$$$
}'
Length of output: 607
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the full context of ClientErrorCode implementation
rg -B 5 -A 5 "CREATE_REPLY_MESSAGE_EXCEPTION" rocketmq-client/src/common/client_error_code.rs
# Check how other parts of the code use this error code
rg "ClientErrorCode::CREATE_REPLY_MESSAGE_EXCEPTION" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 948
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_admin_impl.rs (1)
22-23: Verify consistent usage of the new error structure across the codebase
The introduction of ClientErr suggests a move towards more structured error handling. Let's ensure this pattern is consistently applied across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling refactoring is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that the new error handling pattern using ClientErr is being consistently used throughout the codebase. The evidence shows:
- Both
MQClientError::andClientErr::appear in the same set of core files, indicating a coordinated refactoring - All instances of
Err(MQClientErr())follow the new pattern of wrappingClientErrinstances - The error construction is consistent across different modules, using either
ClientErr::new()orClientErr::new_with_code()
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of the new error type across the codebase
# Check for any remaining direct usage of MQClientError without ClientErr
rg -l "MQClientError::" --type rust
# Check adoption of the new ClientErr type
rg -l "ClientErr::" --type rust
# Look for potential inconsistencies in error handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'Err(MQClientErr($$$))'
Length of output: 17611
rocketmq-client/src/base/validators.rs (3)
27-28: LGTM: Import changes align with error handling refactoring
The migration from error to client_error module is consistent with the PR's objective to refactor error handling.
Line range hint 185-266: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage maintained
The test suite thoroughly covers all validation scenarios including both success and failure cases. The error handling refactoring is well-supported by existing tests.
40-54: Verify input sanitization in group validation
While the code checks for illegal characters, let's verify that the pattern ^[%|a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$ is sufficient for preventing injection attacks.
✅ Verification successful
Input validation implementation is secure and well-tested
The implementation in topic.rs shows a robust and secure approach to input validation:
- Uses a pre-computed bitmap (
VALID_CHAR_BIT_MAP) for efficient character validation - Validates each character individually against the allowed set
- Implements proper length checks
- Has comprehensive test coverage including edge cases
- Uses a whitelist approach allowing only specific characters:
%|-_and alphanumeric - The validation is used consistently across both topic and group names
The pattern ^[%|a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$ is correctly implemented and sufficient for preventing injection attacks as it:
- Strictly limits the allowed character set
- Doesn't allow any special characters that could be used for injection
- Enforces validation on the entire string (not partial matches)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any additional group name validation patterns or sanitization
rg -g '!target' -g '!*.md' -A 3 'group.*validation|sanitize.*group|group.*sanitize'
# Search for any security-related issues or discussions about group name validation
gh issue list --search "group validation security"
Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the actual pattern validation implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'fn is_topic_or_group_illegal'
# Search for any usage or tests of this validation
rg "is_topic_or_group_illegal"
# Look for the regex pattern definition
rg -g '*.rs' "a-zA-Z0-9_-"
Length of output: 1056
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual implementation in topic.rs
cat rocketmq-common/src/common/topic.rs
Length of output: 9054
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/store/local_file_offset_store.rs (2)
35-36: LGTM: Error handling imports align with refactoring goals.
The new imports from the client_error module reflect the improved error handling organization.
35-36: Verify consistent error handling patterns across the codebase.
Let's ensure similar error handling patterns are updated consistently across the codebase.
Also applies to: 92-95, 107-110
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/pull_callback.rs (1)
27-27: Verify consistent usage of the new error module path
The import path change from error to client_error aligns with the error handling refactoring objective.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistently used across the codebase
The verification shows that all imports of MQClientError are using the new client_error module path consistently. There are no remaining imports using the old error module path, confirming that the change is properly implemented across the entire codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of the new client_error module across the codebase
# Expected: All imports should use the new path
# Check for any remaining old imports
rg "use.*error::MQClientError" --type rust
# Check usage of new imports
rg "use.*client_error::MQClientError" --type rust
Length of output: 5036
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/store/remote_broker_offset_store.rs (2)
34-35: LGTM: Improved error type organization
The migration from error to client_error module and introduction of ClientErr shows a better organization of error types, aligning with the PR's error handling refactoring objective.
Line range hint 34-326: Overall: Good error handling refactoring with room for minor improvements
The changes successfully implement a more structured error handling approach using the new ClientErr type. The error messages are descriptive and the wrapping in MQClientError is consistent. Consider the following improvements:
- Extract common error handling patterns into helper methods
- Fix indentation inconsistencies
- Add tests for the new error handling (none visible in the changes)
Let's verify the test coverage for these error cases:
Would you like me to help generate test cases for these error scenarios?
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/pull_api_wrapper.rs (2)
39-40: LGTM: Clean error handling imports
The new imports properly separate the error type (ClientErr) from its variant (MQClientErr), following Rust's module organization best practices.
303-309: LGTM: Improved error context for unsupported tag filtering
The error message provides comprehensive context including broker details and version information, which will help in troubleshooting.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_push_impl.rs (2)
42-43: LGTM: Clean error handling imports
The migration of error types to the client_error module improves code organization and follows Rust's module system conventions.
Line range hint 276-376: Verify error handling coverage in rebalancing logic
The error handling changes look good, but let's verify that all error cases in the rebalancing logic are consistently using the new ClientErr type.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is consistently using the new ClientErr type
All error handling in the rebalancing logic is correctly using the new ClientErr type through MQClientError::MQClientErr. The search results confirm that the error handling changes are consistent with the rest of the codebase, where similar patterns are used for error construction.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining old-style error handling patterns in rebalancing code
rg -l "MQClientError::" --type rust | xargs rg "MQClientError::(?!MQClientErr)"
# Search for potential error cases that might need similar treatment
ast-grep --pattern 'return Err($_)'
Length of output: 44139
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/re_balance/rebalance_impl.rs (2)
Line range hint 167-173: Verify error type structure changes
The error handling for RequestTimeoutError has been simplified. Let's ensure this change is consistent with the new error type definition.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is consistent with error type definition
The error handling for RequestTimeoutError in the code is correct and consistent with its definition in the codebase. The error type is defined in client_error.rs as RequestTimeoutError(#[from] RequestTimeoutErr), which matches the pattern matching used in the code. The simplified error handling with RequestTimeoutError(_) is appropriate as the error details are not needed for this specific case.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the definition of RequestTimeoutError
ast-grep --pattern 'enum MQClientError {
$$$
RequestTimeoutError($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the error type definition
rg "RequestTimeoutError" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 9320
39-39: Verify the new error module structure
The import path has been updated to use the new client_error module. Let's verify that all error types are properly migrated.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the error module structure further to ensure all required error types are available.
Let me check one more thing to verify if there are any other usages of MQClientError that might be affected by this change.
Import change to client_error module is correct and consistent
The verification shows that:
- The
MQClientErrorenum is properly defined inrocketmq-client/src/client_error.rs - All other files in the codebase are consistently using the same import path
client_error::MQClientError - The error types required by the rebalance implementation are available in the new module
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new module exists and contains the required error types
rg -g "*.rs" "pub.*MQClientError"
Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the client_error module
rg -g "*.rs" -B 2 -A 10 "pub enum MQClientError"
Length of output: 774
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for all usages of MQClientError in the codebase
rg -g "*.rs" "use.*MQClientError"
Length of output: 3471
rocketmq-client/src/producer/default_mq_producer.rs (1)
42-43: LGTM: Import changes align with error handling refactoring
The reorganization of error-related imports reflects the improved error handling structure, separating client errors into a dedicated module.
rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs (3)
54-55: LGTM: Clean error handling imports
The imports are well-organized and properly structured for the new error handling mechanism.
333-336: LGTM: Improved error construction
The error handling has been enhanced to use the structured ClientErr::new approach while maintaining the same informative error message.
54-55: Verify consistent error handling pattern usage
Let's ensure the new error handling pattern using ClientErr is consistently applied across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling pattern is consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that the error handling pattern using ClientErr::new is consistently applied throughout the codebase. All error constructions follow the same pattern:
- Using
MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(...))for error creation - Proper error message formatting with descriptive text
- No direct usage of raw
MQClientErrconstruction withoutClientErr::new
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of ClientErr::new pattern
# Search for direct MQClientErr construction without ClientErr::new
rg -A 2 'MQClientErr\s*\(\s*-?\d+\s*,\s*'
# Search for ClientErr::new usage pattern
rg -A 2 'ClientErr::new\('
Length of output: 26132
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (5)
58-59: LGTM: Error handling imports are properly organized.
The new imports for ClientErr and MQClientError are correctly placed and properly scoped.
357-371: LGTM: Error handling in start() method is well-structured.
The error handling has been properly refactored to use ClientErr::new. The error messages are descriptive and include helpful context such as service state and FAQ URLs where applicable.
Line range hint 623-651: LGTM: Error handling in copy_subscription() method is consistent.
The error handling has been properly refactored to use ClientErr::new and includes helpful context from the underlying errors.
676-679: LGTM: Error handling in subscribe() method is well-structured.
The error handling has been properly refactored to use ClientErr::new and includes helpful context from the underlying error.
977-981: LGTM: Error handling in make_sure_state_ok() method is clear and helpful.
The error handling has been properly refactored to use ClientErr::new and includes helpful context about the service state along with a relevant FAQ URL.
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs (6)
541-546: Handle Unexpected Response Codes Appropriately
In process_send_response, any response code not explicitly handled results in an error. Ensure that this error handling covers all cases and provides useful information.
Verify that all non-success response codes are properly accounted for and consider logging unexpected codes for easier debugging.
726-729:
Correct Logic in check_client_in_broker Error Handling
The Ok(()) should only be returned when the response code indicates success. Currently, the Ok(()) is always returned.
Modify the function to return Ok(()) only on success:
if ResponseCode::from(response.code()) != ResponseCode::Success {
return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code(
response.code(),
response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()),
)));
}
- Ok(())
+ else {
+ Ok(())
+ }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
1114-1118:
Check Response Code Before Decoding in unlock_batch_mq
Ensure the response code indicates success before attempting to decode the body to prevent potential panics.
Add a check for the response code before decoding:
if ResponseCode::from(response.code()) == ResponseCode::Success {
if let Some(body) = response.body() {
// Existing decoding logic
} else {
Err(MQClientBrokerError(MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker(
response.code(),
"Response body is empty".to_string(),
addr.to_string(),
)))
}
+ } else {
+ Err(MQClientBrokerError(MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker(
+ response.code(),
+ response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()),
+ addr.to_string(),
+ )))
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
976-980: Handle All Possible Response Codes in process_pull_response
The current implementation may not account for all response codes that the broker could return.
Verify if there are any additional ResponseCode variants that should be handled in the match statement. Update the match arms accordingly to prevent unhandled cases.
Run the following script to identify unhandled response codes:
Adjust the code based on the output.
✅ Verification successful
Response Code Handling is Complete in process_pull_response
The implementation correctly handles all relevant pull-related response codes from the broker. The match statement in process_pull_response covers all specific pull response codes:
ResponseCode::Success→PullStatus::FoundResponseCode::PullNotFound→PullStatus::NoNewMsgResponseCode::PullRetryImmediately→PullStatus::NoMatchedMsgResponseCode::PullOffsetMoved→PullStatus::OffsetIllegal
The catch-all pattern (_) with error handling is appropriate for other response codes as they would indicate unexpected broker behavior for a pull request.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all ResponseCodes and check if they are handled.
rg 'ResponseCode::\w+' -o | sort | uniq > all_codes.txt
rg 'match\s+ResponseCode::from' -A 10 code_file.rs | rg 'ResponseCode::\w+' -o | sort | uniq > handled_codes.txt
comm -23 all_codes.txt handled_codes.txt
Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all response code definitions
echo "=== All Response Codes ==="
rg -A 1 'pub\s+enum\s+ResponseCode'
# Then, let's look at the specific pull response handling in the file
echo -e "\n=== Pull Response Handling ==="
rg -B 2 -A 10 'process_pull_response' rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs
# Let's also check for any response code handling patterns in the same file
echo -e "\n=== Response Code Handling Patterns ==="
rg 'ResponseCode::' rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs
Length of output: 3752
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the complete ResponseCode enum definition
echo "=== Complete Response Code Enum ==="
rg -A 100 'pub\s+enum\s+ResponseCode' rocketmq-remoting/src/code/response_code.rs
# Let's also check if there are any specific pull-related response codes we might have missed
echo -e "\n=== Pull-Related Response Codes ==="
rg 'Pull|PULL' rocketmq-remoting/src/code/response_code.rs
Length of output: 4278
825-830: Check for Additional Error Codes in update_consumer_offset
Currently, only a generic error is returned for non-success response codes. Verify if specific error codes need dedicated handling.
Run the following script to list all response codes used in the codebase that may need handling:
Adjust the error handling logic if necessary based on the findings.
1264-1267: Handle Non-Success Responses in set_message_request_mode
Currently, only non-success responses are handled. Verify if specific error codes require unique handling.
Check if there are specific ResponseCode values that should trigger different behaviors or error messages.
Run the following script to explore possible response codes:
Update the error handling logic based on the findings.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:
Simple Success/Failure Response is Sufficient for set_message_request_mode
The current error handling is appropriate for this method. The function sets the message request mode (Pull/Pop) for a consumer group and topic, where only a basic success/failure response is needed. No special error code handling is required because:
- The operation is a simple configuration update
- The implementation shows only two possible outcomes:
- Success (ResponseCode::Success): Configuration applied
- Any other response code: Configuration failed (returns a ClientErr with the code and remark)
- The MessageRequestMode enum is used only for mode selection (Pull/Pop) and doesn't require specific error handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all response codes related to set_message_request_mode.
rg 'ResponseCode::\w+' -A 5 code_file.rs | grep -B 5 'set_message_request_mode' | rg 'ResponseCode::\w+' -o | sort | uniq
Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for response code definitions and usages in the codebase
rg -A 5 'ResponseCode::\w+' rocketmq-client/src/
# Search specifically for set_message_request_mode implementation and error handling
rg -A 10 'set_message_request_mode' rocketmq-client/src/
# Search for error code definitions
rg 'pub enum ResponseCode' -A 50 rocketmq-client/src/
Length of output: 24711
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ResponseCode enum definition in remoting crate
fd -e rs -e toml 'rocketmq-remoting' .
# Search for response code handling in set_message_request_mode
rg -B 5 -A 10 'pub async fn set_message_request_mode' rocketmq-client/src/
Length of output: 1526
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around set_message_request_mode implementation
rg -B 5 -A 30 'pub async fn set_message_request_mode' rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs
# Search for MessageRequestMode enum and its usage
rg -A 5 'MessageRequestMode' rocketmq-client/src/
Length of output: 10091
rocketmq-client/src/producer/producer_impl/default_mq_producer_impl.rs (3)
1401-1403: Ensure name server settings are validated
When message queue selection fails, ensure that the name server settings are validated before returning an error.
Add a call to validate the name server settings:
self.validate_name_server_setting();
+if self.client_config.get_namesrv_addr().is_none() {
+ return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(
+ "Name server address is not set. Please configure the name server address.",
+ )));
+}
return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(
"select message queue return null.",
)));270-275: Verify timeout calculation logic
The logic for timeout calculation might not correctly handle situations where cost_time exceeds timeout. Ensure that the error handling gracefully manages such cases.
Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in timeout error handling:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the timeout handling logic further by checking the error types and their usage.
Timeout handling logic is correctly implemented
The timeout calculation and error handling is properly implemented with appropriate error types and consistent behavior across the codebase. The code:
- Correctly compares
timeoutwithcost_timeusing a straightforward comparison - Uses dedicated error types (
RequestTimeoutErrorandRemotingTooMuchRequestError) for different timeout scenarios - Provides descriptive error messages that include both the timeout limit and actual time taken
- Maintains consistent timeout handling patterns across different methods in the producer implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances where timeout logic is used to ensure consistency.
# Search for patterns where timeout is compared with cost_time
rg -A 3 -B 3 'if timeout < cost_time' rocketmq-client/src/
Length of output: 4457
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for timeout error types and their definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'struct RequestTimeoutErr { $$$ }'
# Search for other timeout-related error types
rg -A 2 'TimeoutError|TooMuchRequestError' rocketmq-client/src/
Length of output: 9342
468-472: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid cloning send callback unnecessarily
In the asynchronous send operation, the send callback is cloned multiple times. Cloning can be expensive if the callback captures large environments.
Refactor the code to avoid unnecessary cloning:
-send_callback_inner.as_ref().unwrap()(
- None,
- Some(&MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
- "message topic [{}] is not equal with message queue topic [{}]",
- msg.get_topic(),
- mq.get_topic()
- )))),
-);
+if let Some(ref callback) = send_callback_inner {
+ callback(
+ None,
+ Some(&MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
+ "Message topic '{}' does not match the message queue topic '{}'",
+ msg.get_topic(),
+ mq.get_topic()
+ )))),
+ );
+}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | ||
| "Unknow why, Can not find Message Queue for this topic, {}", | ||
| topic | ||
| )))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix typo and improve error message clarity
The error message contains a typo and could be more descriptive about the failure context.
Apply this diff to improve the error message:
Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
- "Unknow why, Can not find Message Queue for this topic, {}",
+ "Unable to find Message Queue for topic '{}'. Possible causes: topic doesn't exist or no available brokers",
topic
))))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | |
| "Unknow why, Can not find Message Queue for this topic, {}", | |
| topic | |
| )))) | |
| Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | |
| "Unable to find Message Queue for topic '{}'. Possible causes: topic doesn't exist or no available brokers", | |
| topic | |
| )))) |
| return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( | ||
| ResponseCode::NoPermission as i32, | ||
| format!("topicPermission value: {} is invalid.", topic_config.perm), | ||
| )); | ||
| ))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent error creation pattern in permission checks
check_topic_config uses new_with_code while check_broker_config uses new for permission validation errors. Consider standardizing the approach.
pub fn check_broker_config(broker_config: &HashMap<String, String>) -> Result<()> {
if let Some(broker_permission) = broker_config.get("brokerPermission") {
if !PermName::is_valid(broker_permission.parse().unwrap()) {
- return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
+ return Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code(
+ ResponseCode::NoPermission as i32,
"brokerPermission value: {} is invalid.",
broker_permission
))));
}
}Also applies to: 175-178
| Err(_) => Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | ||
| "read local offset bak failed, content: {}", | ||
| content | ||
| )))), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Capture and include the underlying error information.
The error handler discards the actual error cause by using Err(_). This could make debugging more difficult.
- Err(_) => Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
- "read local offset bak failed, content: {}",
- content
+ Err(e) => Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
+ "Failed to deserialize backup offset from '{}': {}. Content: {}",
+ format!("{}.bak", self.store_path), e, content📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Err(_) => Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | |
| "read local offset bak failed, content: {}", | |
| content | |
| )))), | |
| Err(e) => Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | |
| "Failed to deserialize backup offset from '{}': {}. Content: {}", | |
| format!("{}.bak", self.store_path), e, content | |
| )))), |
| Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | ||
| "Find Filter Server Failed, Broker Addr: {},topic:{}", | ||
| broker_addr, topic | ||
| )))), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Differentiate error messages for distinct failure cases
The same error message is used for two different failure scenarios, which could make debugging more difficult.
Consider differentiating the error messages:
- Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
- "Find Filter Server Failed, Broker Addr: {},topic:{}",
- broker_addr, topic
- )))),
+ Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
+ "No available filter server found in list for broker[{}], topic[{}]",
+ broker_addr, topic
+ )))),
- Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
- "Find Filter Server Failed, Broker Addr: {},topic:{}",
- broker_addr, topic
- ))))
+ Err(MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
+ "No filter servers configured for broker[{}], topic[{}]",
+ broker_addr, topic
+ ))))Also applies to: 391-394
| return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code( | ||
| ResponseCode::QueryNotFound.into(), | ||
| "Failed to query consume offset from offset store".to_string(), | ||
| )); | ||
| "Failed to query consume offset from offset store", | ||
| ))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce duplication: Extract repeated error message into a constant
The same error message "Failed to query consume offset from offset store" is duplicated in three places. Consider extracting it into a constant for better maintainability.
+ const OFFSET_QUERY_ERROR_MSG: &str = "Failed to query consume offset from offset store";
- return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code(
- ResponseCode::QueryNotFound.into(),
- "Failed to query consume offset from offset store",
- )));
+ return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new_with_code(
+ ResponseCode::QueryNotFound.into(),
+ OFFSET_QUERY_ERROR_MSG,
+ )));Also applies to: 324-327, 365-368
| format!("CODE: {} DESC: {}", response_code, error_message,).as_str(), | ||
| )); | ||
| Self { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential dangling reference caused by .as_str() on a temporary String
Consistent with the previous issues, there's a dangling reference caused by .as_str() on a temporary String.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
let error_message = error_message.into();
- let message = FAQUrl::attach_default_url(Some(
- format!("CODE: {} DESC: {}", response_code, error_message,).as_str(),
- ));
+ let formatted_message = format!("CODE: {} DESC: {}", response_code, error_message);
+ let message = FAQUrl::attach_default_url(Some(&formatted_message));Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| request_response_future_inner.set_cause(Box::new(MQClientError::MQClientErr( | ||
| ClientErr::new(error.to_string()), | ||
| ))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential deadlocks or await issues
In the asynchronous callback, check if there is a potential for deadlocks or missed await keywords that might prevent the future from completing.
Review the asynchronous code to ensure all futures are properly awaited and there are no blocking calls in async contexts.
| request_response_future.set_cause(Box::new(MQClientError::MQClientErr( | ||
| ClientErr::new(error.to_string()), | ||
| ))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Synchronize error handling in callbacks
Ensure that error handling within callbacks is consistent and threadsafe, especially when interacting with shared state or futures.
Review the callback implementation to confirm thread safety and consistency.
| return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( | ||
| "The producer service state is Running", | ||
| ))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle duplicate start calls gracefully
Starting the producer when it is already running should be idempotent or provide a clear message without causing an error.
Consider returning early without error if the service is already running:
if self.service_state == ServiceState::Running {
- return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(
- "The producer service state is Running",
- )));
+ // Already running; no action needed
+ return Ok(());
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new( | |
| "The producer service state is Running", | |
| ))); | |
| if self.service_state == ServiceState::Running { | |
| // Already running; no action needed | |
| return Ok(()); | |
| } |
| return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | ||
| "The specified group name[{}] is equal to default group, please specify another \ | ||
| one.", | ||
| DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP | ||
| )))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using default producer group name
Using the default producer group name can lead to conflicts. Enforce custom group names.
Ensure that a custom producer group name is provided:
if self.producer_config.producer_group() == DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP {
return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!(
"The specified group name '{}' is reserved. Please specify a custom producer group name.",
DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP
))));
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | |
| "The specified group name[{}] is equal to default group, please specify another \ | |
| one.", | |
| DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP | |
| )))); | |
| if self.producer_config.producer_group() == DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP { | |
| return Err(MQClientError::MQClientErr(ClientErr::new(format!( | |
| "The specified group name '{}' is reserved. Please specify a custom producer group name.", | |
| DEFAULT_PRODUCER_GROUP | |
| )))); | |
| } |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1458
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ClientErrfor improved clarity and maintainability across various components.client_errormodule to enhance error reporting.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
ClientErrandMQClientErrortypes, enhancing overall error management.