[ISSUE #1484]♻️Refactor create MQBrokerErr replace with client_broker_err! macro🔥 #1486
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the introduction of a new error handling mechanism in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-1312: Well-executed error handling refactoring.The refactoring to use the
client_broker_err!macro across the codebase is a good architectural improvement because it:
- Centralizes error creation logic in a macro, making future error handling changes easier
- Reduces boilerplate code while maintaining all necessary error information
- Enforces consistent error handling patterns across the codebase
- Makes the code more maintainable and less prone to inconsistencies
Consider documenting the
client_broker_err!macro usage in the codebase's error handling guidelines to ensure consistent adoption in future code additions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs(11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs (1)
87-87: LGTM: New import for error handling macro.
The addition of the client_broker_err macro import aligns with the PR objective to refactor error handling.
| client_broker_err!( | ||
| response.code(), | ||
| response.remark().map_or("".to_string(), |s| s.to_string()), | ||
| addr.to_string() | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent error handling pattern found - some instances still use direct constructor
The verification revealed that there are still 4 instances in mq_client_api_impl.rs where MQBrokerErr is being created directly instead of using the client_broker_err! macro. These instances should be refactored for consistency:
- Line ~200:
MQBrokerErr::new_with_brokerin SendStatus match block - Line ~300:
MQBrokerErr::new_with_brokerin another match block - Line ~400:
MQBrokerErr::new_with_brokerin response code check - Line ~500:
MQBrokerErr::new_with_brokerin LockBatchResponseBody decode error handling
🔗 Analysis chain
Consistent refactoring of error handling using the new macro.
The replacement of direct MQBrokerErr creation with the client_broker_err! macro has been consistently applied across all error handling cases. This refactoring:
- Simplifies error creation
- Reduces code duplication
- Maintains consistent error handling patterns
- Preserves the same error information (code, remark, broker address)
Let's verify that all instances of MQBrokerErr creation have been replaced:
Also applies to: 779-783, 870-874, 970-974, 1037-1041, 1068-1072, 1108-1112, 1151-1155, 1158-1162, 1222-1226, 1308-1312
Let me check the remaining instances of direct MQBrokerErr creation in the implementation file to verify if they should be using the macro.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining direct MQBrokerErr creation that might have been missed
# Search for any remaining direct MQBrokerErr::new calls
rg "MQBrokerErr::new"
# Search for any remaining direct MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker calls
rg "MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker"
Length of output: 1604
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the context around the remaining direct MQBrokerErr usages in the implementation
rg -B 3 -A 3 "MQBrokerErr::new_with_broker" rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs
Length of output: 1486
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1486 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 22.32% 22.32%
=======================================
Files 450 450
Lines 58244 58238 -6
=======================================
Hits 13004 13004
+ Misses 45240 45234 -6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1484
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit