Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1567]🔥Add DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader struct🍻 #1574

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 5, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1567

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new request header for deleting subscription groups in the RocketMQ protocol.
    • Added a data structure to manage the deletion request, including necessary fields and serialization support.
  • Tests

    • Implemented unit tests to validate the functionality and data handling of the new request header.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new module and struct for handling deletion requests of subscription groups within the RocketMQ protocol. Specifically, a module named delete_subscription_group_request_header is added, which includes the DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader struct. This struct contains fields for the group name, a clean offset flag, and an optional RPC request header, along with serialization attributes and unit tests to ensure functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs Added module declaration: pub mod delete_subscription_group_request_header;
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/delete_subscription_group_request_header.rs Introduced DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader struct with fields and unit tests for serialization and validation.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader struct (#[1567])

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

In the realm of code where headers play,
A new struct blooms, brightening the day.
With fields for the group and offsets to clean,
Deletion requests now reign supreme!
So hop along, let’s code and cheer,
For RocketMQ's future is looking clear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.21%. Comparing base (392252b) to head (1b627e9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1574      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   25.17%   25.21%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         454      455       +1     
  Lines       60217    60253      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits        15158    15194      +36     
  Misses      45059    45059              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/delete_subscription_group_request_header.rs (1)

24-34: Add documentation and consider input validation

While the struct implementation is correct, consider the following improvements:

  1. Add documentation for the struct explaining its purpose and usage
  2. Add documentation for the clean_offset field explaining its behavior
  3. Consider adding validation to ensure group_name is non-empty

Example documentation and validation:

 #[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize, Default, RequestHeaderCodec)]
 #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
+/// Represents a request header for deleting a subscription group
+/// Used in the broker's admin operations to remove subscription groups
 pub struct DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader {
     #[required]
+    /// The name of the subscription group to delete
     pub group_name: CheetahString,
 
+    /// When true, cleans up all offsets associated with the subscription group
     pub clean_offset: bool,
 
     #[serde(flatten)]
+    /// Optional RPC request header containing common RPC fields
     pub rpc_request_header: Option<RpcRequestHeader>,
 }
+
+impl DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader {
+    /// Validates the header fields
+    pub fn validate(&self) -> Result<(), String> {
+        if self.group_name.is_empty() {
+            return Err("group_name cannot be empty".to_string());
+        }
+        Ok(())
+    }
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 392252b and 1b627e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/delete_subscription_group_request_header.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1)

23-23: LGTM!

The new module declaration follows the established pattern and is correctly placed in alphabetical order.

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/delete_subscription_group_request_header.rs (1)

1-22: LGTM!

The license header and imports are properly organized and include all necessary dependencies.

Comment on lines +36 to +84
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use cheetah_string::CheetahString;

use super::*;

#[test]
fn delete_subscription_group_request_header_serializes_correctly() {
let header = DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader {
group_name: CheetahString::from_static_str("test_group"),
clean_offset: true,
rpc_request_header: None,
};
let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&header).unwrap();
let expected = r#"{"groupName":"test_group","cleanOffset":true}"#;
assert_eq!(serialized, expected);
}

#[test]
fn delete_subscription_group_request_header_deserializes_correctly() {
let data = r#"{"groupName":"test_group","cleanOffset":true}"#;
let header: DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(data).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
header.group_name,
CheetahString::from_static_str("test_group")
);
assert!(header.clean_offset);
assert!(!header.rpc_request_header.is_none());
}

#[test]
fn delete_subscription_group_request_header_handles_missing_optional_fields() {
let data = r#"{"groupName":"test_group","cleanOffset":false}"#;
let header: DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(data).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
header.group_name,
CheetahString::from_static_str("test_group")
);
assert!(!header.clean_offset);
assert!(!header.rpc_request_header.is_none());
}

#[test]
fn delete_subscription_group_request_header_handles_invalid_data() {
let data = r#"{"groupName":12345}"#;
let result: Result<DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader, _> = serde_json::from_str(data);
assert!(result.is_err());
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix test assertions and add missing test cases

There are several issues in the test implementation:

  1. The assertions for rpc_request_header.is_none() on lines 63 and 75 are incorrect:
-        assert!(!header.rpc_request_header.is_none());
+        assert!(header.rpc_request_header.is_none());
  1. Missing test cases:
    • Test with RpcRequestHeader present
    • Test validation (if validation is added)

Here's an example of the missing test case:

#[test]
fn delete_subscription_group_request_header_with_rpc_header() {
    let header = DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader {
        group_name: CheetahString::from_static_str("test_group"),
        clean_offset: true,
        rpc_request_header: Some(RpcRequestHeader::default()),
    };
    let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&header).unwrap();
    let deserialized: DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(&serialized).unwrap();
    assert!(deserialized.rpc_request_header.is_some());
}

Comment on lines +24 to +34
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize, Default, RequestHeaderCodec)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader {
#[required]
pub group_name: CheetahString,

pub clean_offset: bool,

#[serde(flatten)]
pub rpc_request_header: Option<RpcRequestHeader>,
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Implementation needs completion for proper integration

The verification reveals that while the DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader struct is properly defined with serialization support and unit tests, its integration is incomplete:

  • The request code RequestCode::DeleteSubscriptionGroup is properly defined (code 207)
  • Admin interfaces (MQAdminExt, MQAdminExtAsync) declare the delete_subscription_group method
  • However, the implementations in DefaultMQAdminExt and DefaultMQAdminExtImpl are marked as todo!()
  • No request processor implementation was found for handling the DeleteSubscriptionGroup requests
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify usage in broker admin operations

Let's verify if this struct is properly integrated with the broker's admin operations for deleting subscription groups.


Let me gather more information about the integration between the request header and the admin operations.


Let me check one final aspect - the actual command processing implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential usage of DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader
echo "Searching for DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader usage..."
rg "DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader" -A 5

# Search for potential broker admin endpoints that might need to use this header
echo "Searching for subscription group deletion endpoints..."
rg "delete.*subscription.*group" -i

Length of output: 5789


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of delete_subscription_group in admin modules
echo "Checking admin implementation..."
rg "delete_subscription_group" -A 10 rocketmq-tools/src/admin/

# Check if RequestCode::DeleteSubscriptionGroup is used with this header
echo "Checking request code usage..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "RequestCode::DeleteSubscriptionGroup"

Length of output: 4569


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the processor implementation that handles DeleteSubscriptionGroup requests
echo "Searching for DeleteSubscriptionGroup request processor..."
rg -B 3 -A 10 "RequestCode::DeleteSubscriptionGroup.*=>" 

# Check for any command processor implementations
echo "Searching for command processor implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'match $_.code() {
  $$$
  RequestCode::DeleteSubscriptionGroup => $$$,
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 398

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit e99f8e0 into main Dec 5, 2024
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 5, 2024
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-1567 branch December 6, 2024 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add DeleteSubscriptionGroupRequestHeader struct
4 participants