Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1566]🚀Add QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader struct🍻 #1575

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 5, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1566

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new request header for querying consumption time spans in the messaging system.
    • Added serialization and deserialization capabilities for the new request header.
  • Tests

    • Implemented unit tests to validate the functionality of the new request header, including serialization, deserialization, and error handling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new public module, query_consume_time_span_request_header, in the rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs file. Additionally, a new file query_consume_time_span_request_header.rs defines the QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader struct, which includes three fields and supports serialization and deserialization using the serde library. The file also contains a test module with unit tests to validate the struct's functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs Added module declaration: pub mod query_consume_time_span_request_header;
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/query_consume_time_span_request_header.rs Introduced QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader struct with fields and serialization support; added unit tests.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader struct (1566)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

🐰 In the code we hop and play,
New headers join the fray!
With structs so neat,
Our tasks are complete,
In RocketMQ, we’ll lead the way! 🌟

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 880b726 and d92252b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/query_consume_time_span_request_header.rs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/query_consume_time_span_request_header.rs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 5, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.25%. Comparing base (e99f8e0) to head (d92252b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1575      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   25.21%   25.25%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         455      456       +1     
  Lines       60253    60283      +30     
==========================================
+ Hits        15194    15224      +30     
  Misses      45059    45059              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/query_consume_time_span_request_header.rs (1)

37-79: Add test case for RpcRequestHeader serialization

While the current test coverage is good, it's missing a test case for serialization/deserialization with rpc_request_header present. This would validate the flattening behavior.

Consider adding this test:

#[test]
fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_with_rpc_header() {
    let header = QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader {
        topic: CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"),
        group: CheetahString::from_static_str("test_group"),
        rpc_request_header: Some(RpcRequestHeader::default()),
    };
    let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&header).unwrap();
    let deserialized: QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(&serialized).unwrap();
    assert_eq!(header.topic, deserialized.topic);
    assert_eq!(header.group, deserialized.group);
    assert!(deserialized.rpc_request_header.is_some());
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e99f8e0 and 880b726.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/query_consume_time_span_request_header.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1)

46-46: LGTM! Module declaration is well-placed

The new module declaration follows the project's naming convention and is correctly placed in alphabetical order among other header modules.

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/query_consume_time_span_request_header.rs (1)

24-35: LGTM! Well-structured struct definition

The struct is well-defined with:

  • Appropriate derive macros for serialization and request header functionality
  • Proper field requirements using #[required] attribute
  • Correct type usage (CheetahString for strings)
  • Good use of flattening for the optional RPC header

let header: QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(data).unwrap();
assert_eq!(header.topic, CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"));
assert_eq!(header.group, CheetahString::from_static_str("test_group"));
assert!(!header.rpc_request_header.is_none());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect test assertions

The assertions for rpc_request_header are incorrect. They're asserting that the optional header is present when it should be None.

Fix the assertions in both test methods:

-assert!(!header.rpc_request_header.is_none());
+assert!(header.rpc_request_header.is_none());

Also applies to: 70-70

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader struct
4 participants