Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1565]🍻Add GetTopicStatsInfoRequestHeader struct 💡 #1576

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 5, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1565

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new module for handling topic statistics request headers in the RocketMQ protocol.
    • Added a new struct for managing request headers related to topic consumption time spans, enhancing the protocol's functionality.
  • Tests

    • Implemented comprehensive unit tests to ensure the correctness of the new request header struct, including serialization, deserialization, and error handling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new module and a corresponding struct for handling request headers in the RocketMQ protocol. Specifically, a module named get_topic_stats_info_request_header is added to header.rs, and a new file defines the QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader struct, which includes fields for a topic and an optional request header. The struct is equipped with serialization capabilities and includes unit tests to validate its functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs Added module: pub mod get_topic_stats_info_request_header;
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/get_topic_stats_info_request_header.rs Added struct: pub struct QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader, with serialization and tests.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add GetTopicStatsInfoRequestHeader struct (#1565)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

🐇 In the code where headers grow,
A new struct for topics now flows.
With tests to ensure all is right,
RocketMQ's future is looking bright!
Let's hop along, with joy we cheer,
For each new feature that draws near! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 5, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/get_topic_stats_info_request_header.rs (1)

24-32: Add documentation for the struct and its fields

While the struct definition is technically correct, it would benefit from documentation explaining:

  • The purpose of this request header
  • The meaning and usage of each field
  • Any constraints or requirements for the fields

Add documentation using rustdoc format:

+/// Request header for getting topic statistics information.
+/// This header is used in the RocketMQ protocol to request statistical data about a specific topic.
 #[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize, Default, RequestHeaderCodec)]
 #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
 pub struct QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader {
+    /// The name of the topic to get statistics for.
     #[required]
     pub topic: CheetahString,
 
+    /// Additional topic-specific request parameters.
     #[serde(flatten)]
     pub topic_request_header: Option<TopicRequestHeader>,
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1731b70 and be5dc61.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/get_topic_stats_info_request_header.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1)

38-38: LGTM! Module declaration follows project conventions.

The new module declaration is correctly placed and follows the existing pattern of organizing protocol headers.

Comment on lines +34 to +73
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use cheetah_string::CheetahString;

use super::*;

#[test]
fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_serializes_correctly() {
let header = QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader {
topic: CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"),
topic_request_header: None,
};
let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&header).unwrap();
let expected = r#"{"topic":"test_topic"}"#;
assert_eq!(serialized, expected);
}

#[test]
fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_deserializes_correctly() {
let data = r#"{"topic":"test_topic"}"#;
let header: QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(data).unwrap();
assert_eq!(header.topic, CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"));
assert!(!header.topic_request_header.is_none());
}

#[test]
fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_handles_missing_optional_fields() {
let data = r#"{"topic":"test_topic"}"#;
let header: QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(data).unwrap();
assert_eq!(header.topic, CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"));
assert!(!header.topic_request_header.is_none());
}

#[test]
fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_handles_invalid_data() {
let data = r#"{"topic":12345}"#;
let result: Result<QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader, _> = serde_json::from_str(data);
assert!(result.is_err());
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect test assertions and improve test coverage

There are several issues in the test implementation:

  1. Lines 56 and 64 have incorrect assertions:
assert!(!header.topic_request_header.is_none());  // This asserts the field is Some, but we expect None
  1. The test cases don't fully cover the struct's functionality, missing tests for:
    • Case with topic_request_header present
    • Serialization with topic_request_header

Here's how to fix and improve the tests:

 #[test]
 fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_deserializes_correctly() {
     let data = r#"{"topic":"test_topic"}"#;
     let header: QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(data).unwrap();
     assert_eq!(header.topic, CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"));
-    assert!(!header.topic_request_header.is_none());
+    assert!(header.topic_request_header.is_none());
 }

 #[test]
 fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_handles_missing_optional_fields() {
     let data = r#"{"topic":"test_topic"}"#;
     let header: QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(data).unwrap();
     assert_eq!(header.topic, CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"));
-    assert!(!header.topic_request_header.is_none());
+    assert!(header.topic_request_header.is_none());
 }

+#[test]
+fn query_consume_time_span_request_header_with_topic_request_header() {
+    let header = QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader {
+        topic: CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"),
+        topic_request_header: Some(TopicRequestHeader::default()),
+    };
+    let serialized = serde_json::to_string(&header).unwrap();
+    let deserialized: QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader = serde_json::from_str(&serialized).unwrap();
+    assert_eq!(deserialized.topic, CheetahString::from_static_str("test_topic"));
+    assert!(deserialized.topic_request_header.is_some());
+}

Comment on lines +24 to +32
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize, Default, RequestHeaderCodec)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader {
#[required]
pub topic: CheetahString,

#[serde(flatten)]
pub topic_request_header: Option<TopicRequestHeader>,
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Struct name doesn't match PR objective

The PR and issue #1565 specify adding a GetTopicStatsInfoRequestHeader struct, but the implementation shows QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader. This appears to be implementing a different feature than what was intended.

Please rename the struct to match the intended feature:

-pub struct QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader {
+pub struct GetTopicStatsInfoRequestHeader {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize, Default, RequestHeaderCodec)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct QueryConsumeTimeSpanRequestHeader {
#[required]
pub topic: CheetahString,
#[serde(flatten)]
pub topic_request_header: Option<TopicRequestHeader>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Serialize, Deserialize, Default, RequestHeaderCodec)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct GetTopicStatsInfoRequestHeader {
#[required]
pub topic: CheetahString,
#[serde(flatten)]
pub topic_request_header: Option<TopicRequestHeader>,
}

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.28%. Comparing base (1731b70) to head (be5dc61).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1576      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   25.25%   25.28%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         456      457       +1     
  Lines       60283    60310      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits        15224    15251      +27     
  Misses      45059    45059              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add GetTopicStatsInfoRequestHeader struct
4 participants