Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2308]🚀Add some method for SelectMappedBufferResult #2309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 17, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2308

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved resource management for mapped buffer results by adding a release method.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new release method to the SelectMappedBufferResult struct in the RocketMQ store module. This method provides a mechanism to explicitly release resources associated with the mapped_file field. By using take(), the method ensures that the mapped file can be safely released when no longer needed, improving resource management capabilities of the struct.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/base/select_result.rs Added pub fn release(&mut self) method to SelectMappedBufferResult struct

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add method to SelectMappedBufferResult [#2308]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature🚀, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • rocketmq-rust-bot
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Resource Release 🗂️

In bytes of code, a method springs to life,
Releasing mapped files, cutting through the strife
take() and release(), a dance so neat
Freeing memory, making resource management sweet!

Hop hop hooray for clean and tidy code! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 17, 2025
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 17, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-store/src/base/select_result.rs (1)

80-84: Consider implementing Drop trait for automatic cleanup.

To prevent resource leaks when instances are dropped without explicit release calls, consider implementing the Drop trait if not already implemented elsewhere.

impl Drop for SelectMappedBufferResult {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        self.release();
    }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c1e9b8 and 0093a0f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-store/src/base/select_result.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve

Comment on lines +80 to +84
pub fn release(&mut self) {
if let Some(mapped_file) = self.mapped_file.take() {
mapped_file.release()
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add comprehensive documentation for the release method.

While the implementation is correct, please add documentation comments that explain:

  • The purpose and responsibility of this method
  • Whether it's safe to call multiple times
  • The relationship with other buffer methods (get_buffer, get_bytes, etc.)
  • Whether manual calls are required or if automatic cleanup is available

Example documentation:

/// Releases the resources associated with the mapped file.
/// 
/// This method is safe to call multiple times as it ensures the mapped file
/// is only released once. After calling this method, other buffer-related 
/// methods like `get_buffer()` will panic if called.
/// 
/// Note: This method must be called explicitly to release resources, as 
/// automatic cleanup is not provided through the Drop trait.
pub fn release(&mut self) {

💡 Codebase verification

Add safety documentation for buffer methods

The verification confirms that get_buffer() and get_buffer_slice_mut() can panic if called after release(). Add documentation to these methods warning about the panic behavior. Consider using get_bytes() instead, which already safely returns Option<Bytes>.

Example locations that need documentation:

  • get_buffer() in select_result.rs
  • get_buffer_slice_mut() in select_result.rs
🔗 Analysis chain

Add safety documentation for buffer methods.

The existing buffer methods (get_buffer, get_bytes, etc.) can panic if called after release(). Consider adding documentation to these methods warning about this behavior, or return Result/Option to handle the case where the buffer has been released.

Let's verify if there are any existing usages that might be affected:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct calls to get_buffer and related methods
rg -A 2 "get_buffer|get_bytes|is_in_mem" --type rust

# Search for potential error handling of these methods
ast-grep --pattern 'match $_.get_buffer() { $$ }'

Length of output: 10350

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.21%. Comparing base (6c1e9b8) to head (0093a0f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rocketmq-store/src/base/select_result.rs 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2309      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.21%   28.21%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         504      504              
  Lines       72451    72456       +5     
==========================================
  Hits        20440    20440              
- Misses      52011    52016       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 3049e47 into main Jan 17, 2025
25 of 26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 17, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-2308 branch January 18, 2025 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add some method for SelectMappedBufferResult
3 participants