Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(editor): Add support for nodes with multiple main inputs in new canvas (no-changelog) #10659

Merged

Conversation

alexgrozav
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

image

Related Linear tickets, Github issues, and Community forum posts

https://linear.app/n8n/issue/N8N-7694/multiple-node-inputs-case-is-not-handled

Review / Merge checklist

  • PR title and summary are descriptive. (conventions)
  • Docs updated or follow-up ticket created.
  • Tests included.
  • PR Labeled with release/backport (if the PR is an urgent fix that needs to be backported)

@alexgrozav alexgrozav self-assigned this Sep 4, 2024
@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added n8n team Authored by the n8n team ui Enhancement in /editor-ui or /design-system labels Sep 4, 2024
Copy link

cypress bot commented Sep 4, 2024

n8n    Run #6738

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #6738  •  git commit 4fcb6930d0: 🌳 🖥️ browsers:node18.12.0-chrome107 🤖 alexgrozav 🗃️ e2e/*
Project n8n
Branch Review n8n-7694-multiple-node-inputs-case-is-not-handled
Run status status check passed Passed #6738
Run duration 04m 47s
Commit git commit 4fcb6930d0: 🌳 🖥️ browsers:node18.12.0-chrome107 🤖 alexgrozav 🗃️ e2e/*
Committer Alex Grozav
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 423
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

✅ All Cypress E2E specs passed

@alexgrozav alexgrozav merged commit a5a92ec into master Sep 5, 2024
32 checks passed
@alexgrozav alexgrozav deleted the n8n-7694-multiple-node-inputs-case-is-not-handled branch September 5, 2024 05:03
MiloradFilipovic added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
* master:
  refactor(RabbitMQ Trigger Node): Improve type-safety, add tests, and fix issues with manual triggers (#10663)
  feat(editor): Add support for nodes with multiple main inputs in new canvas (no-changelog) (#10659)
  fix(editor): Set minimum zoom to 0 to allow fitting very large workflows in new canvas (no-changelog) (#10666)
  feat(editor): Change selection to be default canvas behaviour (no-changelog) (#10668)
  feat: More hints to nodes  (#10565)
  fix(editor): Fix opening executions tab from a new, unsaved workflow (#10652)
  fix(AI Agent Node): Fix tools agent when using memory and Anthropic models (#10513)
  feat(editor): Make highlighted data pane floating (#10638)
  fix(editor): Fix workflow loading after switching to executions view in new canvas (no-changelog) (#10655)
  refactor(benchmark): Separate cloud env provisioning from running benchmarks (#10657)
  feat(core): Implement wrapping of regular nodes as AI Tools (#10641)
  refactor(editor): Remove Trial logic in personalization modal and port to script setup (#10649)
  fix(core): Declutter webhook insertion errors (#10650)
  feat: Reintroduce collaboration feature (#10602)
  feat(benchmark): Add scenario for expressions with Set node (#10647)
  feat(benchmark): Add benchmark scenario for binary files (#10648)
  build: Add `reset` script (#10627)
  feat(editor): Overhaul node insert position computation in new canvas (no-changelog) (#10637)
@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Sep 5, 2024

Got released with n8n@1.58.0

riascho pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
n8n team Authored by the n8n team Released ui Enhancement in /editor-ui or /design-system
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants