-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #397, Remove old unit test example, add README.md, further macro cleanup #405
Merged
astrogeco
merged 3 commits into
nasa:integration-candidate
from
CDKnightNASA:fix-397-ut_assert_macros
Apr 15, 2020
Merged
Fix #397, Remove old unit test example, add README.md, further macro cleanup #405
astrogeco
merged 3 commits into
nasa:integration-candidate
from
CDKnightNASA:fix-397-ut_assert_macros
Apr 15, 2020
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
CDKnightNASA
added
enhancement
CCB:Ready
Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
unit-test
Tickets related to the OSAL unit testing (functional and/or coverage)
labels
Apr 3, 2020
This was referenced Apr 3, 2020
skliper
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2020
jphickey
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like it.
Integration Candidate 2020-03-25
astrogeco
changed the title
fix #397 - removed old example, add README.md, further macro cleanup
Fix #397, removed old example, add README.md, further macro cleanup
Apr 7, 2020
astrogeco
changed the title
Fix #397, removed old example, add README.md, further macro cleanup
Fix #397, Remove old unit test example, add README.md, further macro cleanup
Apr 7, 2020
CCB 20200408 - APPROVED |
astrogeco
added
CCB - 20200408
CCB:Approved
Indicates code review and approval by community CCB
and removed
CCB:Ready
Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
labels
Apr 8, 2020
Integration Candidate 2020-04-01
@CDKnightNASA there's some conflicts here, can you resolve them? |
CDKnightNASA
force-pushed
the
fix-397-ut_assert_macros
branch
from
April 15, 2020 00:49
b1d3e13
to
3456b84
Compare
astrogeco
removed
enhancement
unit-test
Tickets related to the OSAL unit testing (functional and/or coverage)
labels
Sep 22, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the contribution
Removes outdated unit test examples, adds macros for concise and clear unit tests, converted binsem unit tests to new macros.
Fix #397
Testing performed
Built unit tests and executed.
Expected behavior changes
Same behavior, concise code.
System(s) tested on
Debian 9.
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Christopher.D.Knight@nasa.gov