Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore!: upgraded near-dependencies to the 0.23 version #350

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

akorchyn
Copy link
Collaborator

@akorchyn akorchyn commented Jun 12, 2024

  • Updated dependencies
  • Updated near-* to 0.23 version

@akorchyn akorchyn changed the title chore: upgraded near-dependencies to the newest version chore: DO NOT MERGE: upgraded near-dependencies to the newest version Jun 17, 2024
@akorchyn akorchyn changed the title chore: DO NOT MERGE: upgraded near-dependencies to the newest version DO NOT MERGE: chore: upgraded near-dependencies to the newest version Jun 17, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to near/nearcore that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
### Description

This pull request tries to de-couple the near-vm-runner from the
dependency list of near-primitives

### Motivation
Near-vm-runner is not a proper dependency for something primitive, but
now it's a part of many near dependencies.
Also, near-vm-runner uses rustix::fs, a blocker for any release on
Windows.

* [here](near/near-cli-rs#350) you can see that
Windows built is broken.
*
[here](https://github.com/near/nearcore/compare/1.39.2...akorchyn:nearcore:patch-defaults?expand=1)
you can see an example patch so build pass

### How is it done?
Well, I have proceeded next way:
* Moved ViewApplyState to node-runtime
* Copied ProfileV3 to near-primitives and created conversion in
node-runtime

#### TODO:
* [x] Windows CI for public libraries :)
* [x] Fix tests compilation


## For reviewers
* Please take a look at a patch that I have created
[here](https://github.com/near/nearcore/compare/1.39.2...akorchyn:nearcore:patch-defaults?expand=1).
Do you think we could rollout 0.22.2 release, so I could continue
rolling out 0.22, but go with this more proper implementation for future
0.23/0.24 release?
posvyatokum pushed a commit to near/nearcore that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
This pull request tries to de-couple the near-vm-runner from the
dependency list of near-primitives

Near-vm-runner is not a proper dependency for something primitive, but
now it's a part of many near dependencies.
Also, near-vm-runner uses rustix::fs, a blocker for any release on
Windows.

* [here](near/near-cli-rs#350) you can see that
Windows built is broken.
*
[here](https://github.com/near/nearcore/compare/1.39.2...akorchyn:nearcore:patch-defaults?expand=1)
you can see an example patch so build pass

Well, I have proceeded next way:
* Moved ViewApplyState to node-runtime
* Copied ProfileV3 to near-primitives and created conversion in
node-runtime

* [x] Windows CI for public libraries :)
* [x] Fix tests compilation

* Please take a look at a patch that I have created
[here](https://github.com/near/nearcore/compare/1.39.2...akorchyn:nearcore:patch-defaults?expand=1).
Do you think we could rollout 0.22.2 release, so I could continue
rolling out 0.22, but go with this more proper implementation for future
0.23/0.24 release?
@akorchyn akorchyn changed the title DO NOT MERGE: chore: upgraded near-dependencies to the newest version DO NOT MERGE: chore!: upgraded near-dependencies to the newest version Jun 19, 2024
@akorchyn akorchyn changed the title DO NOT MERGE: chore!: upgraded near-dependencies to the newest version DO NOT MERGE: chore!: upgraded near-dependencies to the 0.23 version Jun 19, 2024
@akorchyn akorchyn changed the title DO NOT MERGE: chore!: upgraded near-dependencies to the 0.23 version chore!: upgraded near-dependencies to the 0.23 version Jun 19, 2024
@frol frol merged commit 543ebab into near:main Jun 19, 2024
9 checks passed
@frol frol mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2024
frol added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
## 🤖 New release
* `near-cli-rs`: 0.10.2 -> 0.11.0

<details><summary><i><b>Changelog</b></i></summary><p>

<blockquote>

##
[0.11.0](v0.10.2...v0.11.0)
- 2024-06-19

### Added
- Added loading indicators to wait for the view-account-summary command
([#349](#349))
- Added loading indicators to wait for the create-account
(sponsor-by-faucet-service) command
([#339](#339))

### Fixed
- Do not fail view-account-summary command if we could not retrieve
access keys list ([#344](#344))

### Other
- [**breaking**] upgraded near-dependencies to the 0.23 version
([#350](#350))
- Provide instructions that help to resolve a problem with missing
keychain ([#347](#347))
</blockquote>


</p></details>

---
This PR was generated with
[release-plz](https://github.com/MarcoIeni/release-plz/).
marcelo-gonzalez pushed a commit to near/nearcore that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
### Description

This pull request tries to de-couple the near-vm-runner from the
dependency list of near-primitives

### Motivation
Near-vm-runner is not a proper dependency for something primitive, but
now it's a part of many near dependencies.
Also, near-vm-runner uses rustix::fs, a blocker for any release on
Windows.

* [here](near/near-cli-rs#350) you can see that
Windows built is broken.
*
[here](https://github.com/near/nearcore/compare/1.39.2...akorchyn:nearcore:patch-defaults?expand=1)
you can see an example patch so build pass

### How is it done?
Well, I have proceeded next way:
* Moved ViewApplyState to node-runtime
* Copied ProfileV3 to near-primitives and created conversion in
node-runtime

#### TODO:
* [x] Windows CI for public libraries :)
* [x] Fix tests compilation


## For reviewers
* Please take a look at a patch that I have created
[here](https://github.com/near/nearcore/compare/1.39.2...akorchyn:nearcore:patch-defaults?expand=1).
Do you think we could rollout 0.22.2 release, so I could continue
rolling out 0.22, but go with this more proper implementation for future
0.23/0.24 release?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants