PG16: Fix timeout value used in XLogWaitForReplayOf #544
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The previous value assumed usec precision, while the timeout used is in milliseconds, causing replica backends to wait for many hours for WAL replay without the expected progress reports in logs. This fixes the issue.
MMeent
changed the title
hlinnaka
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2024
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to neondatabase/neon
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2024
The previous value assumed usec precision, while the timeout used is in milliseconds, causing replica backends to wait for (potentially) many hours for WAL replay without the expected progress reports in logs. This fixes the issue. Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> ## Problem neondatabase/postgres#279 (comment) The timeout value was configured with the assumption the indicated value would be microseconds, where it's actually milliseconds. That causes the backend to wait for much longer (2h46m40s) before it emits the "I'm waiting for recovery" message. While we do have wait events configured on this, it's not great to have stuck backends without clear logs, so this fixes the timeout value in all our PostgreSQL branches. ## PG PRs * PG14: neondatabase/postgres#542 * PG15: neondatabase/postgres#543 * PG16: neondatabase/postgres#544 * PG17: neondatabase/postgres#545
awarus
pushed a commit
to neondatabase/neon
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2024
The previous value assumed usec precision, while the timeout used is in milliseconds, causing replica backends to wait for (potentially) many hours for WAL replay without the expected progress reports in logs. This fixes the issue. Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> ## Problem neondatabase/postgres#279 (comment) The timeout value was configured with the assumption the indicated value would be microseconds, where it's actually milliseconds. That causes the backend to wait for much longer (2h46m40s) before it emits the "I'm waiting for recovery" message. While we do have wait events configured on this, it's not great to have stuck backends without clear logs, so this fixes the timeout value in all our PostgreSQL branches. ## PG PRs * PG14: neondatabase/postgres#542 * PG15: neondatabase/postgres#543 * PG16: neondatabase/postgres#544 * PG17: neondatabase/postgres#545
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous value assumed usec precision, while the timeout used is in milliseconds, causing replica backends to wait for many hours for WAL replay without the expected progress reports in logs.
This fixes the issue.
Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin exclusion@gmail.com
neondatabase/neon#9937