Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-433 and NETOBSERV-373 - unify names #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2022
Merged

NETOBSERV-433 and NETOBSERV-373 - unify names #26

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2022

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Sep 7, 2022

  • Use "netobserv" instead of "network-observability" (e.g. as the default namespace)
  • Also remove or refresh some outdated doc

Other required PRs:

- Use "netobserv" instead of "network-observability" (e.g. as the
  default namespace)
- Also remove some outdated doc

### Get started
The easiest way to get started is to use the [Network Observability Operator](https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-operator) that will deploy all the components for you.
The easiest way to get started is to use the [NetObserv Operator](https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-operator) that will deploy all the components for you. It is available via [OLM](https://operatorhub.io/operator/netobserv-operator).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we also plan to rename github repos ?
https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-operator

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fear that would be too much hassle... (and same for quay)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems that github has redirect capabilities for both pages / git commands:
https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/renaming-a-repository

I agree we should not do that if it impacts too much things behind the scene but we may give a try for consistency

@jotak jotak merged commit ebe5299 into main Sep 16, 2022
@jotak jotak deleted the unify-names branch September 16, 2022 15:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants