NETOBSERV-1241 Back and forth show the opposite

[jpinsonneau]

I'm suggesting to simply invert back and forth & one way texts.
If it's not clear enough, we should think about a check box / a switch or a radio button instead

[msherif1234]

Can u explain pros vs cons for this change ?

[jpinsonneau]

I don't think there are cons here. Just a matter of better UX.

Currently when 'back and forth' is shown, it's actually one way:

And vice versa:

[msherif1234]

/lgtm

[jpinsonneau]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jpinsonneau

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jpinsonneau]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jpinsonneau]

Merging this as it impacts other debuging / testings

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #369 (9cf5e63) into main (f2a289f) will decrease coverage by 0.53%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #369      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.83%   57.30%   -0.53%     
==========================================
  Files         166      167       +1     
  Lines        7679     7750      +71     
  Branches      918      918              
==========================================
  Hits         4441     4441              
- Misses       2971     3042      +71     
  Partials      267      267              

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	58.17% <ø> (ø)
unittests	54.91% <ø> (-1.96%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
web/src/components/filters/filters-chips.tsx	50.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes