Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1274 add missing labels to defaults #408

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2023

Conversation

jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Following #380 this PR adds new labels to default.
This is usefull for standalone dev.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau added no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator labels Oct 5, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (62bdb9d) 56.69% compared to head (60a7d6f) 57.45%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #408      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.69%   57.45%   +0.76%     
==========================================
  Files          29      168     +139     
  Lines        2025     7947    +5922     
  Branches        0      970     +970     
==========================================
+ Hits         1148     4566    +3418     
- Misses        761     3100    +2339     
- Partials      116      281     +165     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 58.43% <ø> (?)
unittests 54.71% <ø> (-1.98%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
cmd/plugin-backend.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 138 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Oct 10, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 99f7472 into netobserv:main Oct 11, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants