NETOBSERV-1190: change DNS to use latency instead of TS

[msherif1234]

This PR need to be merged once

• NETOBSERV-1062: Add TCP drop and DNS tracking to netobserv operator #331
• NETOBSERV-1190: update dns tracker to calc latency instead of TS netobserv-ebpf-agent#149
• NETOBSERV-1190: update DNS tracking to report latency instead of TS flowlogs-pipeline#455
  are merged

[openshift-ci-robot]

@msherif1234: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1190 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

This PR need to be merged once

• NETOBSERV-1062: Add TCP drop and DNS tracking to netobserv operator #331
• NETOBSERV-1190: update dns tracker to calc latency instead of TS netobserv-ebpf-agent#149
• NETOBSERV-1190: update DNS tracking to report latency instead of TS flowlogs-pipeline#455
  are merged

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[msherif1234]

/ok-to-test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #395 (509b659) into main (a4a3c26) will decrease coverage by 0.85%.
The diff coverage is 51.79%.

❗ Current head 509b659 differs from pull request most recent head 97cd9d0. Consider uploading reports for the commit 97cd9d0 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #395      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.52%   53.67%   -0.85%     
==========================================
  Files          44       44              
  Lines        5423     5559     +136     
==========================================
+ Hits         2957     2984      +27     
- Misses       2259     2360     +101     
- Partials      207      215       +8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	53.67% <51.79%> (-0.85%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/v1alpha1/flowcollector_webhook.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/v1alpha1/zz_generated.conversion.go	0.26% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
api/v1beta1/flowcollector_types.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ntrollers/ebpf/internal/permissions/permissions.go	44.18% <0.00%> (-2.44%)	⬇️
controllers/consoleplugin/consoleplugin_objects.go	95.42% <33.33%> (-1.64%)	⬇️
pkg/helper/flowcollector.go	66.66% <40.00%> (-3.47%)	⬇️
controllers/flowlogspipeline/flp_common_objects.go	81.76% <53.48%> (-4.83%)	⬇️
controllers/ebpf/agent_controller.go	70.70% <58.77%> (-10.36%)	⬇️
api/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go	53.77% <100.00%> (+1.05%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[github-actions]

New images:

• quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:70e53a0
• quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-70e53a0
• quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-70e53a0

They will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build:

# Direct deployment, from operator repo
IMAGE=quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:70e53a0 make deploy

# Or using operator-sdk
operator-sdk run bundle quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-70e53a0

Or as a Catalog Source:

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: CatalogSource
metadata:
  name: netobserv-dev
  namespace: openshift-marketplace
spec:
  sourceType: grpc
  image: quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-70e53a0
  displayName: NetObserv development catalog
  publisher: Me
  updateStrategy:
    registryPoll:
      interval: 1m

[jotak]

/lgtm
But with a suggestion: msherif1234#1

[jotak]

thanks!
/lgtm

[jotak]

@msherif1234 you need to run make update-bundle

[jotak]

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jotak]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment