Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1664: flowmetric isn't dev preview; also mention samples location #660

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented May 28, 2024

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented May 28, 2024

@jotak: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1664 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented May 28, 2024

(this will have to be backported)

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.53%. Comparing base (74e04da) to head (90ad5a1).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #660   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.53%   66.53%           
=======================================
  Files          70       70           
  Lines        8095     8095           
=======================================
  Hits         5386     5386           
  Misses       2315     2315           
  Partials      394      394           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 66.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@@ -1335,8 +1333,7 @@ spec:
version: 1.0.5
webhookdefinitions:
- admissionReviewVersions:
- v1beta1
- v1beta2
- v1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why you have this change ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not intentional, it was generated. I opened a bug: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1665.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I restarted the bundle check , this time it passed

Also: I've a fix here: #662

@jotak jotak requested a review from msherif1234 May 28, 2024 13:19
@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented May 28, 2024

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 28, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jotak jotak added no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator labels May 28, 2024
@jotak jotak merged commit afa07ab into netobserv:main May 28, 2024
11 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved jira/valid-reference lgtm no-doc This PR doesn't require documentation change on the NetObserv operator no-qe This PR doesn't necessitate QE approval
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants