Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(Discord): support new username system #7464

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

Syjalo
Copy link
Contributor

@Syjalo Syjalo commented May 6, 2023

☕️ Reasoning

This PR adds support for the new Discord's username system

🧢 Checklist

  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged

📌 Resources

@Syjalo Syjalo requested a review from ThangHuuVu as a code owner May 6, 2023 20:21
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 6, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
auth-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 22, 2023 3:00pm
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
next-auth-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jul 22, 2023 3:00pm

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 6, 2023

@Syjalo is attempting to deploy a commit to the authjs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Member

@ThangHuuVu ThangHuuVu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @Syjalo thanks for the PR, could you help clear the non related file changes and rebase first? 🙏

@Syjalo Syjalo closed this Jul 22, 2023
@Syjalo Syjalo force-pushed the feat/discord-provider-update branch 2 times, most recently from 943b1a2 to b845729 Compare July 22, 2023 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Refers to `@auth/core` legacy Refers to `next-auth` v4. Minimal maintenance. providers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants