-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SDC: Unify unwarping workflows #21
Labels
Milestone
Comments
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2019
Following nipreps#40, rolls back the changes most involved with PyBIDS also making the API evolve less abruptly. The PR builds on top of nipreps#52, and closes nipreps#16. This PR does not address #20, nor nipreps#19 and nipreps#21 although it is setting the necessary stepping stones.
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2019
This PR closes nipreps#19, reorganizing the unwarping tools for fieldmap-based solutions: - [x] Separate the displacements field generation from actual unwarping (i.e., applying the nonlinear transform). By doing this, we are not only addressing nipreps#19 directly, we are also readying the ground for tackling nipreps#21 since now all the unwarping paths (pepolar, fieldmaps/phases/phasediff, or syn) have more consistent interfaces. - [x] Update the root workflow to reflect these changes. - [x] Unloaded ``unwarp.py`` of the workflow to write reports, which has been moved to a new module called ``outputs.py`` following some of the latest *fMRIPrep* non-written standards. - [x] Polished some minor documentation and stylistic issues within the scope of the proposed changes.
5 tasks
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2019
This PR closes nipreps#19, reorganizing the unwarping tools for fieldmap-based solutions: - [x] Separate the displacements field generation from actual unwarping (i.e., applying the nonlinear transform). By doing this, we are not only addressing nipreps#19 directly, we are also readying the ground for tackling nipreps#21 since now all the unwarping paths (pepolar, fieldmaps/phases/phasediff, or syn) have more consistent interfaces. - [x] Update the root workflow to reflect these changes. - [x] Unloaded ``unwarp.py`` of the workflow to write reports, which has been moved to a new module called ``outputs.py`` following some of the latest *fMRIPrep* non-written standards. - [x] Polished some minor documentation and stylistic issues within the scope of the proposed changes.
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2019
This PR closes nipreps#19, reorganizing the unwarping tools for fieldmap-based solutions: - [x] Separate the displacements field generation from actual unwarping (i.e., applying the nonlinear transform). By doing this, we are not only addressing nipreps#19 directly, we are also readying the ground for tackling nipreps#21 since now all the unwarping paths (pepolar, fieldmaps/phases/phasediff, or syn) have more consistent interfaces. - [x] Update the root workflow to reflect these changes. - [x] Unloaded ``unwarp.py`` of the workflow to write reports, which has been moved to a new module called ``outputs.py`` following some of the latest *fMRIPrep* non-written standards. - [x] Polished some minor documentation and stylistic issues within the scope of the proposed changes.
oesteban
added
impact: high
Estimated high impact task
effort: high
Estimated high effort task
labels
Apr 2, 2020
Very related: #26 |
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2020
This PR attempts to provide a more reliable framework to build fieldmap estimation workflows. Implicitly, it will help addressing issues regarding data conformity (e.g., nipreps#63, nipreps#64, nipreps#65) and also ease larger refactors such as #20, nipreps#21, nipreps#26, and nipreps#101.
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2020
This PR attempts to provide a more reliable framework to build fieldmap estimation workflows. Implicitly, it will help addressing issues regarding data conformity (e.g., nipreps#63, nipreps#64, nipreps#65) and also ease larger refactors such as #20, nipreps#21, nipreps#26, and nipreps#101.
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2020
This PR attempts to provide a more reliable framework to build fieldmap estimation workflows. Implicitly, it will help addressing issues regarding data conformity (e.g., nipreps#63, nipreps#64, nipreps#65) and also ease larger refactors such as #20, nipreps#21, nipreps#26, and nipreps#101.
Actually, this is essentially implementing #26. Closing in favor of that one. |
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2020
This PR attempts to provide a more reliable framework to build fieldmap estimation workflows. Implicitly, it will help addressing issues regarding data conformity (e.g., nipreps#63, nipreps#64, nipreps#65) and also ease larger refactors such as #20, nipreps#21, nipreps#26, and nipreps#101.
oesteban
added a commit
to oesteban/sdcflows
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2020
This PR attempts to provide a more reliable framework to build fieldmap estimation workflows. Implicitly, it will help addressing issues regarding data conformity (e.g., nipreps#63, nipreps#64, nipreps#65) and also ease larger refactors such as #20, nipreps#21, nipreps#26, and nipreps#101.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
After estimation of the displacements field map (either via phase1/2, phasediff, PE-polar, or SyN), the unwarping should happen with a unique workflow.
This requires #19.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: