Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release proposal: v5.0.5 #1905

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Release proposal: v5.0.5 #1905

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Oct 3, 2019

Flushing out the non-semver-major commits for a 5.x release just prior to 6.0.0. Will follow up this release immediately with a 6.0.0

@cclauss #1903 won't land cleanly on v5.x and I'm not sure how to handle it. It seems to me that it might be a semver-major? Particularly the README.md portions. Would you mind either labeling that PR as semver-major or creating a new PR for the appropriate changes directly against the v5.x branch? Let me know if you need any help, if you have trouble maybe you could just tell me what needs to be done.

@rvagg rvagg mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2019
@richardlau
Copy link
Member

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 3, 2019

My apologies, perhaps I made the #1903 changes on a stale branch.

In two hours, I will resend those changes redone on an updated 5.x branch.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Oct 3, 2019

@cclauss no that's fine, your PR was against master and it's now got a divergent README so the backport was dirty. I don't know what the intention is for python support or testing on 5.x so I'm leaving it up to you to decide that -- as long as we have little risk of breaking anything and are accurate in the README that will show up for a 5.x version then I'm fine with whatever.

@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the rvagg/v5.0.5-proposal branch from 0da2df5 to b8314f7 Compare October 4, 2019 03:45
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Oct 4, 2019

running CI, https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/161/ and Travis, will tag and release this when green

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Oct 4, 2019

scratch that, I forgot to backport #1908 but found further README problems. See #1911 for likely fix. Once merged I'll pull it in here and release.

rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2019
@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the rvagg/v5.0.5-proposal branch from b8314f7 to 1163e9c Compare October 4, 2019 12:44
@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the rvagg/v5.0.5-proposal branch from 1163e9c to 034fc90 Compare October 4, 2019 12:46
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Oct 4, 2019

I think this is final, just waiting for CI, then will push it out

@rvagg rvagg closed this Oct 4, 2019
@rvagg rvagg deleted the rvagg/v5.0.5-proposal branch October 4, 2019 13:29
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Oct 4, 2019

v5.0.5 published

rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2019
@cclauss cclauss mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants