-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Array and Object have different values in REPL and in files #7788
Comments
#5703 may be the cause of this. |
Yep, confirmed by bisecting. |
I opened #7793 as a known issue test. Once this is resolved, the test can be moved to the normal test suite. |
15157c3 changed the CLI REPL to default to useGlobal: false by default. This caused the regression seen in nodejs#7788. This commit adds a known issue test while a proper resolution is determined. Refs: nodejs#5703 Refs: nodejs#7788 PR-URL: nodejs#7793 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Yes, it should be reopened if the revert PR lands. |
@lance as a side note, I believe the problem is that |
@cjihrig @addaleax - I think the problem is instead with some of the code here: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/lib/repl.js#L602-L618. In fact, @cjihrig, your known issue test will continue to fail even if we revert #5703 won't it? Because reverting that PR only causes the default to change and that's all. The known issue test is explicitly setting I think that perhaps this issue is related to https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7369/files#r68335215. |
The known issue test shows the relationship between |
/me should have read the revert PR first :) Still, I think it would be better to figure out what the real problem is and fix that rather than revert which just masks the problem. The issue doesn't go a way with a programmatic REPL started with |
#7788 (comment) – |
I agree that we should try to get to the bottom of it, but if it isn't a straightforward fix, we should revert until we have a fix. |
See also e.g. #7351 |
And maybe this is related somehow? #855 I don't really understand V8 Global proxy yet, so still trying to wrap my head around this. |
Change `vm.runInThisContext()` to use the last entered context, not the top-level context that `vm.runInThisContext()` belongs to. Note the call chain: 1. `node::ContextifyScript::RunInThisContext()` 2. `node::ContextifyScript::EvalMachine()` 3. `v8::Script::BindToCurrentContext()` The current context in `RunInThisContext()` is that of the top-level context which was then bound to the script to execute. It works when `vm.runInThisContext()` is called from the top-level context (the common case and hence why this bug went unnoticed for so long) but not when called from an inferior context. As a pleasant side effect, this commit fixes a bug in the REPL where writes to `process.stdout` and `process.stderr` still went to the real stdout and stderr instead of being captured redirected. Fixes previously failing test `known_issues/test-repl-require-context` which has been moved to `test/parallel` and renamed to avoid a conflict with an existing test of the same name. Note that this commit changes the behavior of the following snippet: const s = '(function() { return vm.runInThisContext(this) })()'; const f = vm.runInNewContext(s, vm); f(); Before this commit, it returned the |this| of the new context, now it returns the |this| of the enclosing context. Two steps forward, one step back. Fixes: nodejs#7788 Refs: nodejs#14757
v6.3.0
4.4.0-31-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 13 00:07:12 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I have one file, say
is.js
, that contains the following:In the console,
require('./is.js').isObject({})
returnsfalse
. However,({}).constructor === Object
returnstrue
. Strangely,isNumber(2)
works as expected. Whenrequire
d from another file, everything works as expected.Affected classes:
Object
Array
Date
Error
RegExp
Unaffected classes:
Number
String
Boolean
Map
Set
Symbol
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: