Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lib/querystring: convert to using internal/errors #15565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2017

Conversation

ramimoshe
Copy link
Contributor

covert lib/querystring.js over to using lib/internal/errors.js

ref: #11273

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added errors Issues and PRs related to JavaScript errors originated in Node.js core. querystring Issues and PRs related to the built-in querystring module. labels Sep 23, 2017
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a test and the error type should not change.

@@ -178,7 +179,7 @@ function qsEscape(str) {
if (i < str.length)
c2 = str.charCodeAt(i) & 0x3FF;
else
throw new URIError('URI malformed');
throw new errors.TypeError('ERR_QUERYSTRING_URI_INVALID', 'URI malformed');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error type URIError should stay as it is. If that type does not yet exist in the internal/errors it has to be created.
Out of my perspective a better name for the internal type would also be ERR_INVALID_URI (I am still thinking about if it would be a good idea to combine this with the existing ERR_INVALID_URL type or not) and the error message itself should be moved in the internal errors as static value.

Copy link
Contributor

@refack refack Sep 23, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a temporary workaround this could be done with:

else {
  const e = new URIError('URI malformed');
  e.code = 'ERR_INVALID_URI';
  throw e;
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is the only place in /lib/ where URIError is used, I'm not sure it should not be changed...
/cc @jasnell

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This recommendation is bad out of my perspective. It is not similar to the internal/errors by just adding the error code. It is neither a NodeError, nor would it receive any further changes in case something changes in the internal/errors.
I would also like to keep the error type as URIError even if it is the only occurrence in lib. It is a single line that has to be added to the internal/errors to add that type and use it from then on.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ramimoshe ramimoshe Sep 26, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank for your comments
but I am not fully understand you
@BridgeAR @refack do you mean to add "URIError" to module.exports in internal/errors?
e.g:

module.exports = exports = {
  message,
  URIError, 
  ....

or using the exported Error with URIError
e.g:

throw new errors.Error(URIError)

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

@ramimoshe Thanks a lot for your PR! This goes in the right direction and just needs a bit more work 😃

@refack refack self-assigned this Sep 23, 2017
@ramimoshe
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks,
I changed the error to be ERR_INVALID_URL, and I did a small refactor

@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ E('ERR_NO_LONGER_SUPPORTED', '%s is no longer supported');
E('ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE', 'The "%s" argument is out of range');
E('ERR_OUTOFMEMORY', 'Out of memory');
E('ERR_PARSE_HISTORY_DATA', 'Could not parse history data in %s');
E('ERR_QUERYSTRING_URI_INVALID', '%s');
E('ERR_INVALID_URL', 'URI malformed');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we have a new lint rule that makes sure the error code are sorted in ASCIIbetical order.
It would have made you notice https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/4518d94e6104323b06781ba608e59208d35a6129/lib/internal/errors.js#L243
So IMHO make this ERR_INVALID_URI (so that we can keep the message text the same), and move it to L243 above the previous ERR_INVALID_URL

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Sep 23, 2017

Thanks for following up.
Now all that's left is to fix the tests:
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/4518d94e6104323b06781ba608e59208d35a6129/test/parallel/test-querystring-escape.js#L16
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/4518d94e6104323b06781ba608e59208d35a6129/test/parallel/test-url-parse-invalid-input.js#L28
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/4518d94e6104323b06781ba608e59208d35a6129/test/parallel/test-querystring.js#L273-L276
with something like:

common.expectsError(
  () => qs.stringify({ foo: '\udc00' }),
  {
    code: 'ERR_INVALID_URI',
    type: TypeError,
    message: 'URI malformed'
  }
);

or just as the validator for assert.throws

common.expectsError({
  code: 'ERR_INVALID_URI',
  type: TypeError,
  message: 'URI malformed'
});

I did a small refactor

👍

if (i < str.length)
c2 = str.charCodeAt(i) & 0x3FF;
else
throw new URIError('URI malformed');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if this should to be changed to use internal/errors. URIError seems fine to me.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would definitely recommend to change this to use internal/errors but it should be kept as URIError as I mentioned above (#15565 (comment)).

@ramimoshe
Copy link
Contributor Author

ramimoshe commented Sep 24, 2017

@refack
I am not sure how to update 'decodeURIComponent' function
so "node/test/parallel/test-querystring.js Lines 273 to 276 " test is still checking URIError

 // invalid surrogate pair throws URIError 
 assert.throws(function() { 
   qs.stringify({ foo: '\udc00' }); 
 }, /^URIError: URI malformed$/); 

StackTrace from the test (after changing):

URIError: URI malformed
    at decodeURIComponent (<anonymous>)
    at Url.parse (url.js:292:19)
    at Object.urlParse [as parse] (url.js:98:5)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/rami.moshe/Projects/forks/node/test/parallel/test-url-parse-invalid-input.js:27:5)
    at Module._compile (module.js:600:30)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:611:10)
    at Module.load (module.js:521:32)
    at tryModuleLoad (module.js:484:12)
    at Function.Module._load (module.js:476:3)
    at Function.Module.runMain (module.js:641:10)

@jasnell jasnell added the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label Sep 25, 2017
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

@ramimoshe you can not update the decodeURIComponent function and you should not even try. It is a native function.

The error type should definitely not be changed because it would be inconsistent in that case what error we might return. Please switch back to the URIError and just add that type to the internal/errors as I pointed out.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Ping @ramimoshe

@ramimoshe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank for your comments
but I am not fully understand you
@BridgeAR @refack do you mean to add "URIError" to module.exports in internal/errors?
e.g:

module.exports = exports = {
  message,
  URIError, 
  ....

or using the exported Error with URIError
e.g:

throw new errors.Error(URIError)

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

This is how you can add the URIError to the internal/errors.

module.exports = exports = {
  message,
  Error: makeNodeError(Error),
  TypeError: makeNodeError(TypeError),
  RangeError: makeNodeError(RangeError),
  URIError: makeNodeError(URIError), // <---- 
  AssertionError,
  E // This is exported only to facilitate testing.
};

And this is how you would use it in a different file.

const errors = require('internal/errors');
// ...
throw new errors.URIError('ERR_INVALID_URI');

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

I think I have brought this up in a URL PR before but couldn't find the link. The ECMAScript spec says URIError should only be raised by built-in functions, i.e. functions like decodeURIComponent() that are implemented as part of the language, we should not raise that in our codebase anyway.

(Going to board so no time to dig the link to spec)

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 8, 2017

I couldn't find a reference in the ECMAScript spec (image because the spec takes a while to load)
image


The Web IDL spec only excludes SyntaxError - https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-exceptions

image

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 8, 2017

@ramimoshe, sorry for the delay.

so "node/test/parallel/test-querystring.js Lines 273 to 276 " test is still checking URIError

Use common.expectsError, specifying the type and code. Example

common.expectsError(
() => zlib.deflateSync(i),
{
code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE',
type: TypeError,
message: 'The "buffer" argument must be one of type string, Buffer, ' +
'TypedArray, or DataView'
}
);

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

@refack IMO

Indicates that one of the global URI handling functions was used in a way that is incompatible with its definition.

means it excludes user land methods from throwing a URIError, because those are not "global URI handling functions". Also the WHATWG URL doesn't throw URIError either, it throws TypeError in similar situations.

Anyway, I am still fine with throwing URIError in this PR because that's what we do at the moment.

Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would need to update test/parallel/test-querystring.js tests in order to pass the tests...

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

Also, test/parallel/test-querystring-escape.js needs to be updated as well.

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

@ramimoshe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joyeecheung do you know the issue with ubuntu1404-64 build?
e.g: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linux/13309/nodes=ubuntu1404-64/console

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

@ramimoshe Nope, looks like a flake because the failing test should not go through the query string module.

@ramimoshe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joyeecheung do i have to do something or just wait to approving?

@joyeecheung joyeecheung dismissed stale reviews from BridgeAR and themself October 25, 2017 15:39

Fixed

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

@ramimoshe This is semver-major so needs at least 2 TSC approvals... @nodejs/tsc

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-linter/13033/console

not ok 11 - /usr/home/iojs/build/workspace/node-test-linter/lib/internal/errors.js
  ---
  message: '"ERR_INVALID_URI" is not documented in doc/api/errors.md'
  severity: error
  data:
    line: 291
    column: 1
    ruleId: documented-errors
  messages:
    - message: doc/api/errors.md does not have an anchor for "ERR_INVALID_URI"
      severity: error
      data:
        line: 291
        column: 1
        ruleId: documented-errors
  ...

@ramimoshe Do you have time to document this error code? If not I can do that, just don't want to delay this PR for too long.

@ramimoshe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joyeecheung - yes, i will fix it

Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR-URL: nodejs#15565
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
@refack refack merged commit 9788e96 into nodejs:master Oct 28, 2017
@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 28, 2017

@ramimoshe Thanks!

Qard pushed a commit to ayojs/ayo that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2017
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15565
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Qard pushed a commit to ayojs/ayo that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2017
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15565
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
addaleax pushed a commit to ayojs/ayo that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2017
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15565
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
@refack refack removed their assignment Oct 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
errors Issues and PRs related to JavaScript errors originated in Node.js core. querystring Issues and PRs related to the built-in querystring module. semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants