-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools: fix inspector-check reporting #16902
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently the inspector-check rule does not store the node when the usage of a require('inspector') is done. This means that it is not possible to disable this rule. For example, if you add the following to a test that uses the inspector module: //common.skipIfInspectorDisabled(); /* eslint-disable inspector-check */ This will not disable the check and there will still be a lint error reported. This commit stores the node where the require statement is done which allows for the rule to also be disabled.
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2017
@@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ module.exports = function(context) { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
function reportIfMissing(context, node) { | |||
if (usesInspector && !hasInspectorCheck) { | |||
context.report(node, msg); | |||
if (missingCheckNodes.length > 0 && !hasInspectorCheck) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You don't have to check missingCheckNodes.length > 0
, just the !hasInspectorCheck
is enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah right, I'll fix that. Thanks
jasnell
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2017
cjihrig
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2017
Landed in c2d63a9 |
danbev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2017
Currently the inspector-check rule does not store the node when the usage of a require('inspector') is done. This means that it is not possible to disable this rule. For example, if you add the following to a test that uses the inspector module: //common.skipIfInspectorDisabled(); /* eslint-disable inspector-check */ This will not disable the check and there will still be a lint error reported. This commit stores the node where the require statement is done which allows for the rule to also be disabled. PR-URL: #16902 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2017
Currently the inspector-check rule does not store the node when the usage of a require('inspector') is done. This means that it is not possible to disable this rule. For example, if you add the following to a test that uses the inspector module: //common.skipIfInspectorDisabled(); /* eslint-disable inspector-check */ This will not disable the check and there will still be a lint error reported. This commit stores the node where the require statement is done which allows for the rule to also be disabled. PR-URL: #16902 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2017
Currently the inspector-check rule does not store the node when the usage of a require('inspector') is done. This means that it is not possible to disable this rule. For example, if you add the following to a test that uses the inspector module: //common.skipIfInspectorDisabled(); /* eslint-disable inspector-check */ This will not disable the check and there will still be a lint error reported. This commit stores the node where the require statement is done which allows for the rule to also be disabled. PR-URL: #16902 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the inspector-check rule does not store the node when the
usage of a require('inspector') is done. This means that it is not
possible to disable this rule. For example, if you add the following to
a test that uses the inspector module:
This will not disable the check and there will still be a lint error
reported.
This commit stores the node where the require statement is done which
allows for the rule to also be disabled.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
tools