Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal flag as flaky #16941

Conversation

refack
Copy link
Contributor

@refack refack commented Nov 10, 2017

test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal is also flaky on VS2017

Refs: #16771

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test,inspector,windows

`test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal` is also flaky on VS2017
@refack refack added flaky-test Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI. inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol test Issues and PRs related to the tests. windows Issues and PRs related to the Windows platform. labels Nov 10, 2017
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Nov 10, 2017
@refack refack added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Nov 10, 2017
@refack
Copy link
Contributor Author

refack commented Nov 10, 2017

Request to fast track. CI gives false negatives, and we are tracking the underlying issue in https://github.com/nodejs/node/projects/8

@refack refack changed the title test: flag known flake test: test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal flag as flaky Nov 10, 2017
@gireeshpunathil
Copy link
Member

Fast-tracking based on @refack 's request. We have seen this test causing random CI failures so makes sense to isolate before diagnosing

@gireeshpunathil
Copy link
Member

Landed in 074a5c7 , don't know why the commit is not appearing here!

@targos targos closed this Nov 11, 2017
@gireeshpunathil
Copy link
Member

ah, ok - the commit meta is missing! any clues what is the best way to fix it now?

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Nov 13, 2017

you can add the metadata as a comment at 074a5c7. It's too late to force-push.

gireeshpunathil referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2017
`test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal` is also flaky on VS2017
@gireeshpunathil
Copy link
Member

thanks @targos , done.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

MylesBorins commented Dec 6, 2017

@refack you landed this on 8.x-staging. Current process only allows for the backporting team to land on LTS branches

edit: my apologies, looking at commit data it was not landed by you... sorry about that

whoever landed it, please avoid landing things on 8.x-staging or 6.x-staging

@refack refack reopened this Dec 6, 2017
@refack refack closed this Dec 6, 2017
@refack refack deleted the test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal-flake branch December 6, 2017 21:13
MylesBorins referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
`test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal` is also flaky on VS2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
`test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal` is also flaky on VS2017

PR-URL: #16941
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig cjihrig@gmail.com
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil gpunathi@in.ibm.com
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
`test-inspector-async-hook-setup-at-signal` is also flaky on VS2017

PR-URL: #16941
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig cjihrig@gmail.com
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil gpunathi@in.ibm.com
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. flaky-test Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI. inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol test Issues and PRs related to the tests. windows Issues and PRs related to the Windows platform.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants