Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: rename regression tests with descriptive file names (pt. 7) #19668

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ryzokuken
Copy link
Contributor

@ryzokuken ryzokuken commented Mar 29, 2018

Rename the tests appropriately alongside mentioning the subsystem
Also, make a few basic changes to make sure the tests conform to the standard test structure

Refs: #19105
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/guides/writing-tests.md#test-structure

Checklist

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Mar 29, 2018
@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Mar 29, 2018

@lpinca lpinca added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 29, 2018
@ryzokuken
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lpinca let me just add one more commit in a jiffy.

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Mar 29, 2018

Sure.

@lpinca lpinca removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 29, 2018
@ryzokuken
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lpinca done, thanks! Please take a look at the new one, and if it looks good to you, I'll squash the two.

'use strict';
require('../common');

// This test ensures that the 'exit' event handler is not flaky, and
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tiny nit: I'd simplify like "This test ensures that no asynchronous operations are performed in the 'exit' event handler".

@lpinca lpinca added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 29, 2018
Rename test-fs-truncate-nodejsGH-6233 to test-fs-truncate-clear-file-zero
Rename test-process-exit-nodejsGH-12322 to test-process-exit-flaky-handler

Refs: nodejs#19105
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/guides/writing-tests.md#test-structure
@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Mar 29, 2018

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Apr 1, 2018

Landed in 107b067.

lpinca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2018
- Rename test-fs-truncate-GH-6233 to test-fs-truncate-clear-file-zero
- Rename test-process-exit-GH-12322 to test-process-exit-handler

PR-URL: #19668
Refs: #19105
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@lpinca lpinca closed this Apr 1, 2018
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2018
- Rename test-fs-truncate-GH-6233 to test-fs-truncate-clear-file-zero
- Rename test-process-exit-GH-12322 to test-process-exit-handler

PR-URL: #19668
Refs: #19105
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2018
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2018
- Rename test-fs-truncate-GH-6233 to test-fs-truncate-clear-file-zero
- Rename test-process-exit-GH-12322 to test-process-exit-handler

PR-URL: #19668
Refs: #19105
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants