-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: remove util from common #3324
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
util is loaded just for one use of util.format(). Replace it with a string template. While we're at it, delete nearby lengthy comment justifying use of fs.readFileSync().
CI won't tell us much because the only tests that use |
LGTM |
2 similar comments
LGTM |
LGTM |
Landed in 6f14b3a |
Trott
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2015
util is loaded just for one use of util.format(). Replace it with a string template. While we're at it, delete nearby lengthy comment justifying use of fs.readFileSync(). PR-URL: #3324 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
This was referenced Oct 13, 2015
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2015
Now that we have backticks we no longer need to use util.format to template strings! This commit was inspired by #3324, and it replaces instances of util.format with backtick strings in a number of tests Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> PR-URL: #3359
should this be backported to lts? |
Can but not critical |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2015
Now that we have backticks we no longer need to use util.format to template strings! This commit was inspired by #3324, and it replaces instances of util.format with backtick strings in a number of tests Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> PR-URL: #3359
This was referenced Oct 27, 2015
Trott
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2015
util is loaded just for one use of util.format(). Replace it with a string template. While we're at it, delete nearby lengthy comment justifying use of fs.readFileSync(). PR-URL: #3324 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Landed in v4.x-staging in d4fced7 |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2015
Now that we have backticks we no longer need to use util.format to template strings! This commit was inspired by #3324, and it replaces instances of util.format with backtick strings in a number of tests Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> PR-URL: #3359
Trott
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2015
util is loaded just for one use of util.format(). Replace it with a string template. While we're at it, delete nearby lengthy comment justifying use of fs.readFileSync(). PR-URL: #3324 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
util is loaded just for one use of util.format(). Replace it with a
string template. While we're at it, delete nearby lengthy comment
justifying use of fs.readFileSync().