-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
npm config
fails in workspaces
#6099
Comments
|
+1 . We are using node:lts-buster for our builds and are facing same issue. |
This also breaks all the workflows that use |
Just ran into this on a fresh install on a new machine. npm ERR! code ENOWORKSPACES
npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces.
npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR! /home/johnl/.npm/_logs/2023-03-20T21_34_37_668Z-debug-0.log It looks like a workaround is to go down to 0.9.2? Considering that npm workspaces is what our app uses as it's "monorepo framework" I don't suppose I have a whole lot of choice there. Is this intentional, or this is a bug of some sort? FWIW, I did also try |
Co-authored-by: Fernando Fernández <ferferga@hotmail.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit.
Co-authored-by: Fernando Fernández <ferferga@hotmail.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the Gitrhub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: ferferga <ferferga@hotmail.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the Gitrhub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: aweebs <8809837+aweebs@users.noreply.github.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the Gitrhub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: aweebs <8809837+aweebs@users.noreply.github.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the Gitrhub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: aweebs <8809837+aweebs@users.noreply.github.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the Gitrhub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: aweebs <8809837+aweebs@users.noreply.github.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the GitHub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: aweebs <8809837+aweebs@users.noreply.github.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the GitHub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: aweebs <8809837+aweebs@users.noreply.github.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the GitHub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
Co-authored-by: aweebs <8809837+aweebs@users.noreply.github.com> Due to a regression in npm 9.3.0 (upgraded by Node.JS 18 LTS at 18.14.0, see https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V18.md#2023-02-02-version-18140-hydrogen-lts-bethgriggs-prepared-by-juanarbol), the `npm get config` command stopped working in workspaces. This made our actions using actions/setup-node to fail. Issues were opened in the relevant repositories since january and february (check npm/cli#6099 and actions/setup-node#712) but it looks like getting this fixed upstream it's going to take a long time. We have been waiting for a really long time for other fixes in npm, so I don't expect this situation will be solved really soon We need a working CI before the Vue 3 merge, so applying this commit will solve the issue in the meantime. In the future, it might be interesting to revert this commit. Also format the GitHub Actions workflows using the official VSCode GitHub extension
When will this bug be fixed? |
+1 we're also facing failures in our pipeline after upgrading from node 16 -> 18 due to this issue |
I also ran into this issue today. Using Node.js v18.17.0 and NPM v10.2.5 and v9.6.7 |
Running into this issue across multiple environments in office and remote the last 48 hours. |
That said, if you really want to manage the config of your project from within a workspace, you can by passing Minimum working reproduction:
And in the case of the original issue:
If, for some reason, you are trying to create/manage nested
With the above, you'll still want to include/exclude the root (ie. |
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099 **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: cipolleschi Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: cipolleschi Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: cipolleschi Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: cipolleschi Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: cipolleschi Differential Revision: D53609308
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #42941 I noticed that programatically running `npm set registry <value>` would fail within the repo root dir (intended run location) (`node` version `18.18.2`). ``` npm ERR! This command does not support workspaces. ``` It turns out this is no longer supported from npm 9.x: npm/cli#6099. **Note**: The workaround discussed in this thread is incompatible/nontrivial with `npx`, so I've opted to remove this behaviour. **Changes** - Remove `npm set registry http://localhost:4873` call. - This is non-breaking due to the [explicit `--registry` arg already present in `run-e2e-ci-tests.js`](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/b366b4b42e0f91eb2b1850c404fadd0f0322fc61/scripts/run-ci-e2e-tests.js#L102). The previous `.npmrc` config value is unnecessary, and probably was being ignored (will be validated for this PR in CircleCI run). - Add comment against remaining `.npmrc` write, convert to `fs` call. - Remove unused params on `setupVerdaccio` (moved to constants which will be exported and referenced in the next diff). Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: cipolleschi Differential Revision: D53609308 fbshipit-source-id: 77d3666b42963cd61f6d3fd0be00cdc19bbb1ec8
Since this tripped me up: it's edit: Just so there's a simple answer that people can actually copy paste, the following commands work for me inside of a npm workspace. Do read @darcyclarke's original post for a more nuanced answer, though.
|
I created this by following the instructions on https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v7/using-npm/workspaces. (This is just to simplify reproducing npm/cli#6099)
Seriously? Is it a problem to read the config from workspace? Why is not still fixed? |
Optional dependencies are installed by default. We can not disable "install optional by default", cuz NX will fail: nrwl/nx#20617 We can not configure NPM to omit optional deps only per workspace, cuz: npm/cli#6099
* feat: tup-700 storybook STEPS 1. `npm add -D @nx/storybook@17.2.8` 2. `npx nx@17.2.8 g @nx/storybook:configuration core-components --uiFramework="@storybook/react-vite" --bundler="vite"` 3. "Do you want to set up Storybook interaction tests? (Y/n) › false" CONCERNS 1. Generator installed `@swc-node/register` and `@swc/core`. 2. `@vitejs/plugin-react-swc` is already isntalled. 3. [Storybook 7 does not work with @vitejs/plugin-react-swc](storybookjs/storybook#22381) 4. I worry I cannot move to Storybook 8 via NX, because it requires NX v18. * deps: tup-700 uninstall `@swc-…` - Vite already uses `@vitejs/plugin-react-swc` (notice the SWC). - Storybook seems to work fine without these. - I read that in v8, Storybook will stop isntalling backup compilers. * feat: tup-700 Button stories, working Controls * fix: tup-700 ignore stories during build * fix: nx serve/build/test core-components * feat: tup-700 button story * style: npx nx format:write * docs(tup-ui): tup-700 README "Contributing" * fix: tup-700 npm ci core-components workspace ★ Running npm ci at this point: - DOES reinstall deps - does NOT create libs/core-components/node_modules - does NOT create libs/core-components/package-lock.json * npx nx format:write * docs: do not reference lib names This causes more work when renaming a library. * docs: do reference (other) lib names These references are outside of this lib, so yeah, reference lib name. * docs(README): add `make start` step * feat: make storybook optional * feat: make storybook optional (not peer) * docs(README): fix serve/start command * fix: make storybook optional (not peer) * chore: (redundantly) include optional dependences Optional dependencies are installed by default. We can not disable "install optional by default", cuz NX will fail: nrwl/nx#20617 We can not configure NPM to omit optional deps only per workspace, cuz: npm/cli#6099 * fix: limit install overhead for core-components For core-components, tell dev to only install for core-components. * fix: add missing dependencies for core-components All this change was required to run `npx nx serve core-components`. * fix: add missing `build-storybook` npm command * fix: a TypeScript lint error Error occurred as red squiggly udnerline in code editor when importing a component from within a component. * fix: do not pass size to `<Button type="link">` * feat: load global css via typescript not html
* test(@tacc/core-components): TUP-700 (WIP) * fix: tup-700 do not commit dist * docs(README): tup-700 add `build core-components` * feat: tup-700 peer dependencies * feat: tup-700 build (no tested on a client yet) * feat: tup-700 1st attempt to split files/css build * fix: tup-700 add main file to dist * build: tup-700 do not build tests * fix: tup-700 add types & fix resulting errors 1. import & use `dts` - Fixes build error: > error TS2307: Cannot find module './….module.css' or its corresponding type declarations. > … import styles from './….module.css'; 2. `"composite": true` - Fixes Typescript lint error: > Referenced project '/…/tup-ui/libs/core-components/tsconfig.lib.json' must have setting "composite": true. 3. `"declaration": true,` - Seemingly caused by `"composite": true`. - Fixes Vite build error: > \> nx run core-components:build:production > error TS6304: Composite projects may not disable declaration emit. * fix: tup-700 tag types in package.json * style: tup-700 move rollup opts input glob inline * style: npx nx format:write * style: tup-700 peerDependencies "So the consuming application is aware that it must have React installed to use this package." — https://dev.to/receter/how-to-create-a-react-component-library-using-vites-library-mode-4lma#dependencies * feat: tup-700 add CSS as sideEffects "To prevent the CSS files from being accidentally removed by the consumer's tree-shaking efforts…" —https://dev.to/receter/how-to-create-a-react-component-library-using-vites-library-mode-4lma#side-effects * feat: tup-700 ensure build before publish * fix: tup-700 do 2d5ab1c, 6336f2c, 233f165 correct Move the changes from thsoe commits to be in core-components package.json, not root package.json. - style: tup-700 peerDependencies "So the consuming application is aware that it must have React installed to use this package." — https://dev.to/receter/how-to-create-a-react-component-library-using-vites-library-mode-4lma#dependencies - feat: tup-700 add CSS as sideEffects "To prevent the CSS files from being accidentally removed by the consumer's tree-shaking efforts…" — https://dev.to/receter/how-to-create-a-react-component-library-using-vites-library-mode-4lma#side-effects - feat: tup-700 ensure build before publish * chore: tup-700 resolve vite.config.ts comment code Resolve all commented code in `vite.config.ts`. - `outDir` DELETED cuz `rollupOptions` > `output` exists - `reportCompressedSize` RESTORED cuz why not & it was already there - `commonjsOptions` & `transformMixedEsModules` DELETED cuz… - no `require` i.e. common js modules - `lib`'s `name` and `fileName` DELETED cuz… - `rollupOptions` > `output` > `assetFileNames` exists - `rollupOptions` > `output` > `entryFileNames` exists * fix: tup-700 scripts inaccurate * docs: tup-700 README * feat: tup-700 core-components deps via workspace * fix: tup-700 core-components deps via workspace * npx nx format:write * fix: core-components/package-lock.json should not exist Only 1 root package-lock.json in an Nx project such as tup-ui. Having this may have been cause of errors when starting CMS. * chore: rename Navbar → NavbarWrapper * chore: rename FieldWrapperFormik → FormikFieldWrapper * npx nx format:write * chore: move withBuilder to core-components * feat: move core-wrappers to core-components Because the distinction between them is not accurate. Both have components that import other components. * lint: rename some index.js to index.ts * lint: import via rel. path not lib name * deps: add core-wrappers deps to peerDeps * docs: do not reference lib names This causes more work when renaming a library. * docs: do reference (other) lib names These references are outside of this lib, so yeah, reference lib name. * docs(README): remove duplicate step * feat: TUP-700 @tacc/core-components - Storybook (#435) * feat: tup-700 storybook STEPS 1. `npm add -D @nx/storybook@17.2.8` 2. `npx nx@17.2.8 g @nx/storybook:configuration core-components --uiFramework="@storybook/react-vite" --bundler="vite"` 3. "Do you want to set up Storybook interaction tests? (Y/n) › false" CONCERNS 1. Generator installed `@swc-node/register` and `@swc/core`. 2. `@vitejs/plugin-react-swc` is already isntalled. 3. [Storybook 7 does not work with @vitejs/plugin-react-swc](storybookjs/storybook#22381) 4. I worry I cannot move to Storybook 8 via NX, because it requires NX v18. * deps: tup-700 uninstall `@swc-…` - Vite already uses `@vitejs/plugin-react-swc` (notice the SWC). - Storybook seems to work fine without these. - I read that in v8, Storybook will stop isntalling backup compilers. * feat: tup-700 Button stories, working Controls * fix: tup-700 ignore stories during build * fix: nx serve/build/test core-components * feat: tup-700 button story * style: npx nx format:write * docs(tup-ui): tup-700 README "Contributing" * fix: tup-700 npm ci core-components workspace ★ Running npm ci at this point: - DOES reinstall deps - does NOT create libs/core-components/node_modules - does NOT create libs/core-components/package-lock.json * npx nx format:write * docs: do not reference lib names This causes more work when renaming a library. * docs: do reference (other) lib names These references are outside of this lib, so yeah, reference lib name. * docs(README): add `make start` step * feat: make storybook optional * feat: make storybook optional (not peer) * docs(README): fix serve/start command * fix: make storybook optional (not peer) * chore: (redundantly) include optional dependences Optional dependencies are installed by default. We can not disable "install optional by default", cuz NX will fail: nrwl/nx#20617 We can not configure NPM to omit optional deps only per workspace, cuz: npm/cli#6099 * fix: limit install overhead for core-components For core-components, tell dev to only install for core-components. * fix: add missing dependencies for core-components All this change was required to run `npx nx serve core-components`. * fix: add missing `build-storybook` npm command * fix: a TypeScript lint error Error occurred as red squiggly udnerline in code editor when importing a component from within a component. * fix: do not pass size to `<Button type="link">` * feat: load global css via typescript not html
@darcyclarke we have a scenario where we have a common ci script that uses is there some way at the cli i can ask npm if a project IS a workspace project in a bash script so i can use your approach only IF it is one? I've done some light google-ing and cant figure it out. |
Is there an existing issue for this?
This issue exists in the latest npm version
Current Behavior
Since npm@9.3.0 calling
npm config list
ornpm config get registry
inside a workspace of a worktree results in an error:
Here's part of the log:
It used to work in 9.2.0.
Expected Behavior
Well, show (and use!) all configs.
Steps To Reproduce
Build a worktree with packages. .npmrc in root. In a package call
npm config list
.Environment
; copy and paste output from `npm config ls` here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: