Feature/static api

[Hadatko]

Hi @MichalPrincNXP ,
this is WIP PR. It is not best and it is touching other platforms/env. I was working in nxp directory structure so some cases, which are now different (some files are generic here, but in nxp repo they looked env/platform specific) need be fixed. Could you propose me suggestions for this PR? Thank you.

Related to #13

[MichalPrincNXP]

Hi Dusan, thank you, the proposal looks ok to me. I have couple of comments that will be added into the code review.

[MichalPrincNXP]

Also, I am afraid we could get into troubles when having multiinstance. I am writing it here as this needs to be analyzed.

[Hadatko]

Also, I am afraid we could get into troubles when having multiinstance. I am writing it here as this needs to be analyzed.

Sure, from my point of you, it shouldn't be worse or better now in multiinstance case. I was trying to keep static context in same scope as semaphore, mutex,...

[MichalPrincNXP]

Dusan, as per this instruction, could you please allow me to edit this PR. I would like to pass the update from my side to be reviewed and tested by you? Do you agree? Thank you.

[Hadatko]

Sure, i agree, just i don't see simple way how can you push directly to this branch.

[Hadatko]

I cannot see the checkbox for allowing that. Maybe due to: isaacs/github#1681

[MichalPrincNXP]

1. rpmsg_queue_rx_cb_data_t typedef placement needs to be finalized
2. #include "rpmsg_default_config.h" needs to be added into all rpmsg_env_specific.h

[Hadatko]

Is it ok now?

[MichalPrincNXP]

Is it ok now?

I think so, let me retest on my side once again, ok?

[Hadatko]

Sure.

[MichalPrincNXP]

Thank you for the effort, Dusan!