Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unit tests #8

Open
1 of 2 tasks
wleoncio opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Add unit tests #8

wleoncio opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@wleoncio
Copy link
Member

wleoncio commented Nov 24, 2021

  • Add examples as unit tests
  • Get expectations from output of original EMJMCMC2016 repo
@wleoncio wleoncio added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 24, 2021
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2021
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2021
These functions (with the exception of `parall.gmj`) are explicitly
mentioned on README.md, and the execution of their examples is not
straightforward, so their test scripts are separated. Perhaps using the
function examples is not the way to go, and new, shorter (sub 5-second) test code needs
to be written before this issue is resolved.
This was referenced Nov 26, 2021
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2021
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2021
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2021
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2021
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2022
This is related to issue #8 because it fixes unit tests.

Summary of changes:

- Automatic restyling
- Added alternative as `estimate.gamma.cpen_2` (to be merged in the
future, since they are quite similar)
- Incorporated functions from the `relat` argument
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
wleoncio added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
Didn't manage to run code on 1.4.3. however, the tests are generic enough to work anyway. We should do more tests to cover the values themselves at another point
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant