Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix BwC for PluginInfo with semver range support #12273

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

abseth-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

@abseth-amzn abseth-amzn commented Feb 9, 2024

Description

Fixes BwC versioning introduced with #12271
Note, BwC tests will fail until #12271 is merged

Related Issues

Resolves #[1707]

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
  • Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

…ible with V_2_13_0

Signed-off-by: Abhilasha Seth <abseth@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change 945387d

Incompatible components

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/flow-framework.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git]

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 945387d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 945387d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Feb 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 945387d: FAILURE

#12197
#9191

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 945387d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Feb 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 945387d: FAILURE

#12276

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

❕ Gradle check result for 945387d: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.remotestore.RemoteIndexPrimaryRelocationIT.testPrimaryRelocationWhileIndexing

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (30c4210) 71.49% compared to head (945387d) 71.37%.

Files Patch % Lines
...c/main/java/org/opensearch/plugins/PluginInfo.java 0.00% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12273      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.49%   71.37%   -0.12%     
+ Complexity    59829    59774      -55     
============================================
  Files          4959     4959              
  Lines        281116   281116              
  Branches      40857    40857              
============================================
- Hits         200979   200644     -335     
- Misses        63392    63808     +416     
+ Partials      16745    16664      -81     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@reta reta merged commit 708d4df into opensearch-project:main Feb 9, 2024
61 of 117 checks passed
peteralfonsi pushed a commit to peteralfonsi/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
…ible with V_2_13_0 (opensearch-project#12273)

Signed-off-by: Abhilasha Seth <abseth@amazon.com>
rayshrey pushed a commit to rayshrey/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
…ible with V_2_13_0 (opensearch-project#12273)

Signed-off-by: Abhilasha Seth <abseth@amazon.com>
shiv0408 pushed a commit to Gaurav614/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
…ible with V_2_13_0 (opensearch-project#12273)

Signed-off-by: Abhilasha Seth <abseth@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <hishiv@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants