Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] describe index.query.max_nested_depth setting #6346

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
mkhludnev opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #6347
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

[DOC] describe index.query.max_nested_depth setting #6346

mkhludnev opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #6347
Assignees
Labels
3 - Done Issue is done/complete v2.13.0

Comments

@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor

mkhludnev commented Feb 3, 2024

What do you want to do?

  • Request a change to existing documentation
  • Add new documentation
  • Report a technical problem with the documentation
  • Other

Tell us about your request. Provide a summary of the request and all versions that are affected.

Completion of opensearch-project/OpenSearch#11670

  1. 2.x code doc: Add index.query.max_nested_depth fix #6346 #6347
  2. 3.0 code doc: Add index.query.max_nested_depth=20 in 3.0 #6715

What other resources are available? Provide links to related issues, POCs, steps for testing, etc.

mkhludnev added a commit to mkhludnev/documentation-website that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2024
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>
@hdhalter hdhalter added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. and removed untriaged labels Feb 5, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter added v2.13.0 3 - Done Issue is done/complete and removed 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. labels Mar 18, 2024
@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @mkhludnev
how I can put #6347 to 3.0 as well?

@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @mkhludnev how I can put #6347 to 3.0 as well?

This will get pushed to 3.0, but if you want additional changes, you can create a new PR.

@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkhludnev commented Mar 19, 2024

@hdhalter

This will get pushed to 3.0, but if you want additional changes, you can create a new PR.

3.0 doc change #6715

@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

I'm looking for a way to clone this issue, but I don't think it's possible in GitHub. In any event, after 2.13, I'll reopen this issue so we can use it for tracking for the 3.0 PR.

kolchfa-aws added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2024
* Document index.query.max_nested_depth fix #6346

Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix index.query.max_nested_depth

Co-authored-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update _install-and-configure/configuring-opensearch/index-settings.md

Co-authored-by: Andriy Redko <drreta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update index-settings.md

Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update index-settings.md

Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andriy Redko <drreta@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Done Issue is done/complete v2.13.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants