Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1859201: bump etcd v3.4.9 #54

Merged

Conversation

hexfusion
Copy link

@hexfusion hexfusion commented Jul 15, 2020

This PR bumps etcd to v3.4.9 for OCP 4.5 and resolves a few ourstanding bugs such as.

etcd server

3.4.8 changelog: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/CHANGELOG-3.4.md#v348-2020-05-18
3.4.9 changelog: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/CHANGELOG-3.4.md#v349-2020-05-20

CARRY:

polyrabbit and others added 30 commits April 6, 2020 07:06
…f-#11754-upstream-release-3.4

Automated cherry pick of etcd-io#11754 on release-3.4
to improve authentication performance in concurrent scenarios when enable auth and using authentication based password
…of-#11817-origin-release-3.4

Automated cherry pick of etcd-io#11817 on release-3.4
* clientv3: fix grpc-go(v1.27.0) incompatible changes to balancer/resolver.

* vendor: upgrade gRPC Go to v1.24.0

Picking up some performance improvements and bug fixes.

https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/releases/tag/v1.24.0

Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>

* vendor: update gRPC Go to v1.26.0 (etcd-io#11522)

* GO111MODULE=on go mod vendor

* GO111MODULE=on go mod vendor go 1.14

Bump travis 2

Co-authored-by: EDDYCJY <313687982@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuchen Zhou <yczhou@google.com>
etcdserver/*, wal/*: changes to snapshots and wal logic
etcdserver/*: changes to snapshots and wal logic to fix etcd-io#10219
etcdserver/*, wal/*: add Sync method
etcdserver/*, wal/*: find valid snapshots by cross checking snap files and wal snap entries
etcdserver/*, wal/*:Add comments, clean up error messages and tests
etcdserver/*, wal/*: Remove orphaned .snap.db files during Release

Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
ref. etcd-io#11896

Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
…f-#11735-origin-release-3.4

Automated cherry pick of etcd-io#11735 on release-3.4
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
Correcting a typo from 2f10964 (version: openshift-v4.0, 2018-11-29).
…uild.

Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.z" release, but it targets "4.6.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1859201: bump etcd v3.4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@retroflexer
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hexfusion, retroflexer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859201, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1859196 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1859196 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 27, 2020
@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

cc @sdodson this finishes all etcd bumps for OCP4

@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 28, 2020
@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

/test e2e-aws-upgrade

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9b0a7f7 into openshift:openshift-4.5 Jul 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/etcd#54. Bugzilla bug 1859201 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1859201: bump etcd v3.4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet